Felemban Osama, Abdrabuh Raghdah, El Meligy Omar, Farsi Najat, Bakry Ahmed Samir, Abu Haimed Tariq
Paediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia.
Paediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21521, Egypt.
J Funct Biomater. 2024 Jan 1;15(1):17. doi: 10.3390/jfb15010017.
Despite considerable improvements in oral health, dental caries remains a public health issue. The most frequently used technique to remove caries is through rotating drills. New minimally invasive strategies were introduced into dental practice, such as the use of lasers to perform highly controlled tissue ablation while limiting pain and discomfort, as well as overcoming drill phobia. The objective was to assess and compare treatment with Er:YAG laser versus a conventional rotary treatment during cavity preparation in children with regard to bond interface quality. In a randomized trial using a split-mouth design, 40 (9-12 year-old) children with 80 carious primary molars were included. The cavity in one quadrant was treated conventionally using a bur, while the cavity in the other quadrant was prepared using an Er:YAG laser. Twenty restored teeth were extracted after one year. The SEM histological evaluation of bond interface results demonstrated no statistically significant differences between restorations placed following bur preparation and those placed following the Er:YAG laser preparation, and both treatments demonstrated promising results. Over a one-year period, no statistically significant differences in the bond interface quality were observed following class I cavity preparation in primary teeth with either Er:YAG laser or a conventional rotary bur.
尽管口腔健康状况有了显著改善,但龋齿仍然是一个公共卫生问题。最常用的去除龋齿的技术是使用旋转牙钻。新的微创策略被引入牙科实践,例如使用激光进行高度可控的组织消融,同时减少疼痛和不适,以及克服牙钻恐惧症。目的是评估和比较在儿童龋洞制备过程中,使用铒钇铝石榴石(Er:YAG)激光治疗与传统旋转治疗在粘结界面质量方面的差异。在一项采用双盲设计的随机试验中,纳入了40名(9至12岁)患有80颗龋坏乳牙的儿童。一个象限的龋洞使用牙钻进行传统治疗,而另一个象限的龋洞使用Er:YAG激光制备。一年后拔除了20颗修复后的牙齿。粘结界面结果的扫描电子显微镜组织学评估表明,牙钻制备后放置的修复体与Er:YAG激光制备后放置的修复体之间在统计学上没有显著差异,两种治疗方法都显示出了良好的效果。在一年的时间里,无论是使用Er:YAG激光还是传统旋转牙钻进行I类乳牙龋洞制备后,粘结界面质量在统计学上均未观察到显著差异。