Choi Jin Ho, Park Hwanhee, Park Joo Kyung, Lee Jong Kyun, Lee Kyu Taek, Lee Kwang Hyuck
Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Jan 19;16:17588359231225045. doi: 10.1177/17588359231225045. eCollection 2024.
A regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nab-paclitaxel (GPA) has shown promising results in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC).
This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of GPA compared to a regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) in patients with aBTC.
Retrospective study.
Patients with aBTC who received first-line chemotherapy with GPA or GP regimen at the Samsung Medical Center between July 2020 and June 2022 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
In all, 37 patients were treated with GPA and 43 patients with GP. The GPA group showed significantly longer median PFS [12.0 months (95% CI, 7.2-16.8)] compared to the GP group [5.5 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4; = 0.007)]. The median overall survival (OS) was also longer in the GPA group [18.7 months (95% CI, 13.7-23.7)] than in the GP group [10.7 months (95% CI, 1.5-19.9); = 0.021]. First-line chemotherapy with GPA was associated with longer PFS, while metastatic disease at initial diagnosis and post-treatment increase in CA 19-9 level were associated with worse PFS.
The GPA regimen improved the PFS of patients with aBTC compared to the GP regimen but showed no significant benefit in terms of OS after adjusting for confounding variables. Further large-scale studies are required to establish optimal indications for GPA.
吉西他滨、顺铂和纳米白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(GPA)方案在晚期胆管癌(aBTC)患者中显示出了有前景的结果。
本研究旨在评估与吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP)方案相比,GPA方案在aBTC患者中的获益情况。
回顾性研究。
纳入2020年7月至2022年6月期间在三星医疗中心接受GPA或GP方案一线化疗的aBTC患者。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。
共有37例患者接受了GPA治疗,43例患者接受了GP治疗。与GP组[5.5个月(95%CI,3.7 - 7.4);P = 0.007]相比,GPA组的中位PFS显著更长[12.0个月(95%CI,7.2 - 16.8)]。GPA组的中位总生存期(OS)也比GP组更长[18.7个月(95%CI,13.7 - 23.7)],而GP组为[10.7个月(95%CI,1.5 - 19.9);P = 0.021]。GPA一线化疗与更长的PFS相关,而初诊时的转移性疾病和治疗后CA 19 - 9水平升高与更差的PFS相关。
与GP方案相比,GPA方案改善了aBTC患者的PFS,但在调整混杂变量后,在OS方面未显示出显著获益。需要进一步的大规模研究来确定GPA的最佳适应证。