文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

激励和抑制因素影响 mHealth 技术在流产后护理中的应用:综述研究。

Motivating and inhibiting factors influencing the application of mhealth technology in post-abortion care: a review study.

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06253-0.


DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06253-0
PMID:38254045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Abortion and its complications are challenges that endanger women's health, especially in developing countries. It seems that the application of mhealth technology can be useful as a safe and affordable strategy in post-abortion care. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing the use of mhealth technology in post-abortion care. METHODS: This was a review study conducted in 2023 and articles published in English between 2010 and 1st November 2023 were searched in PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Embase databases as well as Google Scholar. Data were collected using a data extraction form and were analyzed narratively. RESULTS: The influencing factors could be divided into the motivating and inhibiting factors. The motivating factors included the subgroups of the individual factors (e.g., saving time), technical factors (e.g., usability), economic factors (e.g., saving costs), and ethico-legal factors (e.g., improving security and confidentiality of the information). Similarly, the inhibiting factors consisted of individual factors (e.g., fear of expressing abortion), technical factors (e.g., a lack of access to the network and the Internet), economic factors (e.g., inappropriate patient financial status), and ethico-legal (e.g., concerns over the security and confidentiality of information). CONCLUSION: This study underscores the importance of considering various technical and non-technical factors influencing the design and implementation of mHealth technology in post-abortion care. Developers need to address these factors to ensure successful technology adoption and mitigate risks. The findings contribute to the enhancement of women's health and offer insights for future technology acceptance models in the mHealth field.

摘要

背景:人工流产及其并发症是威胁妇女健康的挑战,尤其是在发展中国家。移动医疗技术的应用似乎可以作为一种安全且负担得起的策略,应用于流产后护理。本研究旨在确定影响流产后护理中使用移动医疗技术的因素。

方法:这是一项 2023 年进行的综述研究,检索了 2010 年至 2023 年 11 月 1 日期间在 PubMed、Scopus、ProQuest、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库以及 Google Scholar 发表的英文文章。使用数据提取表收集数据,并进行叙述性分析。

结果:影响因素可分为促进因素和抑制因素。促进因素包括个体因素亚组(例如,节省时间)、技术因素(例如,可用性)、经济因素(例如,节省成本)和伦理法律因素(例如,提高信息的安全性和保密性)。同样,抑制因素包括个体因素(例如,害怕表达流产)、技术因素(例如,无法访问网络和互联网)、经济因素(例如,患者经济状况不佳)和伦理法律因素(例如,对信息的安全性和保密性的担忧)。

结论:本研究强调了在流产后护理中设计和实施移动医疗技术时考虑各种技术和非技术因素的重要性。开发人员需要解决这些因素,以确保成功采用技术并降低风险。研究结果有助于提高妇女的健康水平,并为移动医疗领域未来的技术接受模型提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c648/10804730/7d872b7740ab/12884_2024_6253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c648/10804730/7d872b7740ab/12884_2024_6253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c648/10804730/7d872b7740ab/12884_2024_6253_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Motivating and inhibiting factors influencing the application of mhealth technology in post-abortion care: a review study.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024-1-22

[2]
Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-9-27

[3]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[4]
The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.

J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023

[5]
Sensor-Based mHealth Authentication for Real-Time Remote Healthcare Monitoring System: A Multilayer Systematic Review.

J Med Syst. 2019-1-6

[6]
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Access to and Interest in mHealth: National Web-based Cross-sectional Survey.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-3-6

[7]
Users' Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study.

JMIR Form Res. 2021-12-2

[8]
A Systematic Review of Mobile Health Technology Use in Developing Countries.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015

[9]
Health Providers' Perceptions and Experiences of Using mHealth for Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

J Med Internet Res. 2023-9-12

[10]
Lessons from digital technology-enabled health interventions implemented during the coronavirus pandemic to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a global scoping review.

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023-3-20

引用本文的文献

[1]
Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-9-27

[2]
Using mobile health in primiparous women: effect on awareness, attitude and choice of delivery type, semi-experimental.

Reprod Health. 2024-4-10

本文引用的文献

[1]
Lessons learned from developing and implementing digital health tools for self-managed abortion and sexual and reproductive healthcare in Canada, the United States, and Venezuela.

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023-12

[2]
Effectiveness of mHealth intervention on safe abortion knowledge and perceived barriers to safe abortion services among female sex workers in Vietnam.

Mhealth. 2023-1-28

[3]
Improving stigma and psychosocial outcomes among post-abortion Kenyan women attending private clinics: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered mobile phone-based intervention.

PLoS One. 2022

[4]
Safe abortion within the Venezuelan complex humanitarian emergency: understanding context as key to identifying the potential for digital self-care tools in expanding access.

Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021

[5]
Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study.

JMIR Hum Factors. 2022-3-9

[6]
Telehealth for Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Hybrid Telemedicine-Community Accompaniment Model for Abortion and Contraception Services in Pakistan.

Front Glob Womens Health. 2021-7-26

[7]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Syst Rev. 2021-3-29

[8]
Proposing a mobile apps acceptance model for users in the health area: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Health Informatics J. 2021

[9]
Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Improving Contraceptive Use in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020-12-23

[10]
'I didn't feel judged': exploring women's access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia.

J Prim Health Care. 2020-3

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索