• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

激励和抑制因素影响 mHealth 技术在流产后护理中的应用:综述研究。

Motivating and inhibiting factors influencing the application of mhealth technology in post-abortion care: a review study.

机构信息

Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06253-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06253-0
PMID:38254045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804730/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Abortion and its complications are challenges that endanger women's health, especially in developing countries. It seems that the application of mhealth technology can be useful as a safe and affordable strategy in post-abortion care. The purpose of this study was to identify factors influencing the use of mhealth technology in post-abortion care.

METHODS

This was a review study conducted in 2023 and articles published in English between 2010 and 1st November 2023 were searched in PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, and Embase databases as well as Google Scholar. Data were collected using a data extraction form and were analyzed narratively.

RESULTS

The influencing factors could be divided into the motivating and inhibiting factors. The motivating factors included the subgroups of the individual factors (e.g., saving time), technical factors (e.g., usability), economic factors (e.g., saving costs), and ethico-legal factors (e.g., improving security and confidentiality of the information). Similarly, the inhibiting factors consisted of individual factors (e.g., fear of expressing abortion), technical factors (e.g., a lack of access to the network and the Internet), economic factors (e.g., inappropriate patient financial status), and ethico-legal (e.g., concerns over the security and confidentiality of information).

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the importance of considering various technical and non-technical factors influencing the design and implementation of mHealth technology in post-abortion care. Developers need to address these factors to ensure successful technology adoption and mitigate risks. The findings contribute to the enhancement of women's health and offer insights for future technology acceptance models in the mHealth field.

摘要

背景

人工流产及其并发症是威胁妇女健康的挑战,尤其是在发展中国家。移动医疗技术的应用似乎可以作为一种安全且负担得起的策略,应用于流产后护理。本研究旨在确定影响流产后护理中使用移动医疗技术的因素。

方法

这是一项 2023 年进行的综述研究,检索了 2010 年至 2023 年 11 月 1 日期间在 PubMed、Scopus、ProQuest、Web of Science 和 Embase 数据库以及 Google Scholar 发表的英文文章。使用数据提取表收集数据,并进行叙述性分析。

结果

影响因素可分为促进因素和抑制因素。促进因素包括个体因素亚组(例如,节省时间)、技术因素(例如,可用性)、经济因素(例如,节省成本)和伦理法律因素(例如,提高信息的安全性和保密性)。同样,抑制因素包括个体因素(例如,害怕表达流产)、技术因素(例如,无法访问网络和互联网)、经济因素(例如,患者经济状况不佳)和伦理法律因素(例如,对信息的安全性和保密性的担忧)。

结论

本研究强调了在流产后护理中设计和实施移动医疗技术时考虑各种技术和非技术因素的重要性。开发人员需要解决这些因素,以确保成功采用技术并降低风险。研究结果有助于提高妇女的健康水平,并为移动医疗领域未来的技术接受模型提供了见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c648/10804730/7d872b7740ab/12884_2024_6253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c648/10804730/7d872b7740ab/12884_2024_6253_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c648/10804730/7d872b7740ab/12884_2024_6253_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Motivating and inhibiting factors influencing the application of mhealth technology in post-abortion care: a review study.激励和抑制因素影响 mHealth 技术在流产后护理中的应用:综述研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06253-0.
2
Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care.接受和使用移动医疗技术进行流产后护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11633-5.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review.美国通过远程医疗提供堕胎护理:快速审查。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2023 Nov-Dec;68(6):744-758. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13586. Epub 2023 Dec 9.
5
Sensor-Based mHealth Authentication for Real-Time Remote Healthcare Monitoring System: A Multilayer Systematic Review.基于传感器的移动健康认证在实时远程医疗监测系统中的应用:一项多层次系统综述。
J Med Syst. 2019 Jan 6;43(2):33. doi: 10.1007/s10916-018-1149-5.
6
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women's Access to and Interest in mHealth: National Web-based Cross-sectional Survey.原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民妇女对移动医疗的获取和兴趣:全国性网络横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 6;25:e42660. doi: 10.2196/42660.
7
Users' Perceptions Toward mHealth Technologies for Health and Well-being Monitoring in Pregnancy Care: Qualitative Interview Study.用户对用于孕期保健中健康与幸福感监测的移动健康技术的认知:定性访谈研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 2;5(12):e28628. doi: 10.2196/28628.
8
A Systematic Review of Mobile Health Technology Use in Developing Countries.发展中国家移动健康技术应用的系统评价
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;213:223-6.
9
Health Providers' Perceptions and Experiences of Using mHealth for Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.卫生保健提供者使用移动医疗应用程序干预慢性病的认知和体验:定性系统评价和荟萃综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 12;25:e45437. doi: 10.2196/45437.
10
Lessons from digital technology-enabled health interventions implemented during the coronavirus pandemic to improve maternal and birth outcomes: a global scoping review.数字技术赋能的卫生干预措施在冠状病毒大流行期间改善母婴和生育结局的经验教训:全球范围的系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 20;23(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05454-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptance and use of mobile health technology in post-abortion care.接受和使用移动医疗技术进行流产后护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1130. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11633-5.
2
Using mobile health in primiparous women: effect on awareness, attitude and choice of delivery type, semi-experimental.在初产妇中使用移动健康:对意识、态度和分娩方式选择的影响,半实验性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 10;21(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01785-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons learned from developing and implementing digital health tools for self-managed abortion and sexual and reproductive healthcare in Canada, the United States, and Venezuela.在加拿大、美国和委内瑞拉开发与实施用于自我管理堕胎及性与生殖健康护理的数字健康工具所汲取的经验教训。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(4):2266305. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2266305. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
Effectiveness of mHealth intervention on safe abortion knowledge and perceived barriers to safe abortion services among female sex workers in Vietnam.移动健康干预对越南女性性工作者安全堕胎知识及安全堕胎服务认知障碍的效果
Mhealth. 2023 Jan 28;9:3. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-41. eCollection 2023.
3
Improving stigma and psychosocial outcomes among post-abortion Kenyan women attending private clinics: A randomized controlled trial of a person-centered mobile phone-based intervention.
改善肯尼亚接受私人诊所堕胎后女性的耻辱感和心理社会结局:一项基于个人为中心的手机干预的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270637. eCollection 2022.
4
Safe abortion within the Venezuelan complex humanitarian emergency: understanding context as key to identifying the potential for digital self-care tools in expanding access.委内瑞拉复杂人道主义紧急情况下的安全堕胎:理解背景是识别数字自我护理工具在扩大可及性方面潜力的关键。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2021;29(3):2067104. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2022.2067104.
5
Suitability of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 Model for Predicting mHealth Acceptance Using Diabetes as an Example: Qualitative Methods Triangulation Study.以糖尿病为例,技术接受与使用统一理论2模型预测移动健康接受度的适用性:定性方法三角验证研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 9;9(1):e34918. doi: 10.2196/34918.
6
Telehealth for Addressing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: A Hybrid Telemedicine-Community Accompaniment Model for Abortion and Contraception Services in Pakistan.在新冠疫情期间及之后满足性与生殖健康及权利需求的远程医疗:巴基斯坦堕胎与避孕服务的远程医疗-社区陪伴混合模式
Front Glob Womens Health. 2021 Jul 26;2:705262. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2021.705262. eCollection 2021.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
8
Proposing a mobile apps acceptance model for users in the health area: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.提出一个针对健康领域用户的移动应用接受模型:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
Health Informatics J. 2021 Jan-Mar;27(1):1460458220976737. doi: 10.1177/1460458220976737.
9
Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Improving Contraceptive Use in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.移动健康干预措施在改善中低收入国家避孕措施使用方面的效果:系统评价。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Dec 23;8(4):813-826. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00069.
10
'I didn't feel judged': exploring women's access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia.“我没有感到被评判”:探索澳大利亚农村地区女性获得远程医疗堕胎的途径。
J Prim Health Care. 2020 Mar;12(1):49-56. doi: 10.1071/HC19050.