Office of Public Health Studies, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Access to Health Fund, United Nations Office for Project Services, Myanmar.
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Dec 23;8(4):813-826. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00069.
mHealth interventions are being tested to improve contraceptive uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); however, the effectiveness of these interventions has not been systematically reviewed.
The primary objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of mHealth interventions to improve contraceptive uptake and adherence in LMICs. A second objective was to identify mHealth features and behavior change communication components used in these mHealth interventions.
A systematic search was conducted of online databases for peer-reviewed articles that reported on intervention studies with men and women from LMICs and measured mHealth intervention impact on contraceptive uptake and/or adherence. Key search terms included "mHealth" or "mobile health," "contraception" or "family planning," and "low- and middle-income countries." PRISMA guidelines were followed for reporting review methods and findings. The Cochrane risk-of-bias 2 tool for randomized trials was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. The GRADE approach was used to determine the quality of evidence.
Eight randomized controlled trial studies met the inclusion criteria. Four studies experienced implementation challenges (e.g., intervention components were not utilized fully by participants, intervention participants did not receive the full intervention content, contamination, low response rate, and/or missing data). Only 3 interventions were found to be effective, and these included a "push" approach, interactive communication, information tailored to participants, motivational messaging, and male partner involvement.
To date, the delivery of mHealth interventions for improving family planning in LMICs has met with implementation challenges that have reduced the researcher's ability to test intervention effectiveness. Although 3 of 8 studies found improved contraceptive use in the intervention group, the review cannot draw concrete conclusions on the overall effectiveness of mHealth interventions to increase contraceptive use in LMICs. Further research with robust program fidelity is recommended.
移动健康干预措施正在被测试,以提高低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的避孕普及率;然而,这些干预措施的有效性尚未得到系统评价。
本系统评价的主要目的是评估移动健康干预措施在改善 LMICs 中避孕普及率和依从性方面的有效性。第二个目的是确定这些移动健康干预措施中使用的移动健康功能和行为改变沟通要素。
系统地搜索了在线数据库,以查找报告来自 LMICs 的男性和女性的干预研究的同行评议文章,并测量了移动健康干预措施对避孕普及率和/或依从性的影响。主要搜索词包括“移动健康”或“移动医疗”、“避孕”或“计划生育”以及“低收入和中等收入国家”。报告方法和结果遵循 PRISMA 指南。使用 Cochrane 随机试验风险偏倚工具 2 评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。使用 GRADE 方法确定证据质量。
八项随机对照试验研究符合纳入标准。四项研究遇到了实施挑战(例如,干预措施的部分未被参与者充分利用,干预参与者未收到完整的干预内容,发生交叉污染,应答率低和/或数据缺失)。只有 3 项干预措施被发现有效,这些干预措施包括“推动”方法、互动式沟通、针对参与者的个性化信息、激励性信息和男性伴侣的参与。
迄今为止,在 LMICs 中提供移动健康干预措施以改善计划生育的方法遇到了实施挑战,这降低了研究人员测试干预措施有效性的能力。尽管 8 项研究中有 3 项发现干预组的避孕使用率提高,但该综述无法对移动健康干预措施在提高 LMICs 避孕普及率方面的总体有效性得出具体结论。建议进一步开展具有稳健项目一致性的研究。