Suppr超能文献

传统方式、使用芯片或桶陈酿的红葡萄酒代谢组学

Metabolomics of Red Wines Aged Traditionally, with Chips or Staves.

作者信息

Dumitriu Gabur Georgiana-Diana, Sánchez-Suárez Fernando, Peinado Rafael A, Cotea Valeriu V, de Lerma Nieves López, Gabur Iulian, Simioniuc Violeta

机构信息

Faculty of Horticulture, Iasi University of Life Sciences, 700490 Iasi, Romania.

Agricultural Chemistry, Soil Science and Microbiology Department, University of Córdoba, Campus of Rabanales, N-IV Road, Km 396, 14071 Córdoba, Spain.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Jan 7;13(2):196. doi: 10.3390/foods13020196.

Abstract

Traditionally and alternatively aged wines' odour activity values (OAVs) are investigated to differentiate and highlight the differences between the selected methods. An analysis of the volatile aroma compounds of wines derived from ageing in barrels, oak chips, and staves was performed using stir bar sorptive extraction chromatography-mass spectroscopy (SBSE-GC-MS). The results showed that alcohols, esters, and oak compounds were the main contributors to aroma, and their OAVs were higher in the stave samples after 3 months than in the samples from the other two systems of ageing. Furthermore, wines aged with staves have stronger fruity, spiced, and woody aromas, while samples aged in barrels present more chemistry-driven, floral, caramelly, and creamy aromas. The staves-medium plus toast (SMPT at 3 months > 225) and chips-medium plus toast (CMPT at 3 months > 170) showed the highest levels of aromatic series, suggesting that alternative systems provided more powerful aromas than traditional systems, such as barrels-medium plus toast (BMPT at 3 months > 150). A principal component analysis (PCA), orthogonal partial least squares (OPLS) analysis, and cluster analysis allowed for a clear differentiation to be made between red wines according to ageing systems and ageing times. The odour activity values fingerprint in winemaking is a feasible approach to characterise and distinguish wines. Moreover, OAVs provide important information on the effects of production methods on wine quality and aroma profile.

摘要

传统上以及作为替代方法,人们会研究陈酿葡萄酒的气味活性值(OAVs),以区分并突出所选方法之间的差异。使用搅拌棒吸附萃取色谱 - 质谱联用仪(SBSE - GC - MS)对经桶、橡木片和橡木桶板陈酿的葡萄酒中的挥发性香气化合物进行了分析。结果表明,醇类、酯类和橡木化合物是香气的主要贡献成分,在3个月后,橡木桶板样品中的这些成分的气味活性值高于其他两种陈酿系统的样品。此外,用橡木桶板陈酿的葡萄酒具有更强的果香、辛香和木香,而桶陈酿的样品则呈现出更多受化学驱动的、花香、焦糖香和乳香。橡木桶板 - 中度加烤香(3个月时SMPT>225)和橡木片 - 中度加烤香(3个月时CMPT>170)显示出最高水平的香气系列,这表明替代系统比传统系统(如桶 - 中度加烤香,3个月时BMPT>150)能提供更强的香气。主成分分析(PCA)、正交偏最小二乘法(OPLS)分析和聚类分析能够根据陈酿系统和陈酿时间对红葡萄酒进行清晰区分。葡萄酒酿造中的气味活性值指纹图谱是表征和区分葡萄酒的一种可行方法。此外,气味活性值提供了关于生产方法对葡萄酒质量和香气特征影响的重要信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c5/10814756/e696aa7dfd71/foods-13-00196-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验