Rossi Giuseppe, Borlenghi Erika, Zappasodi Patrizia, Lussana Federico, Bernardi Massimo, Basilico Claudia, Molteni Alfredo, Lotesoriere Ivana, Turrini Mauro, Frigeni Marco, Fumagalli Monica, Cozzi Paola, Gigli Federica, Cattaneo Chiara, Fracchiolla Nicola Stefano, Riva Marta, Martini Gianluca, Mancini Valentina, Cairoli Roberto, Todisco Elisabetta
Department of Hematology, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25100 Brescia, Italy.
Division of Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 16;16(2):386. doi: 10.3390/cancers16020386.
A retrospective survey was conducted in hematologic centres of the Rete Ematologica Lombarda (REL) on 529 older AML patients seen between 2020-2022. Compared to 2008-2016, the use of intensive chemotherapy (ICT) decreased from 40% to 18.1% and of hypomethylating agents (HMAs) from 19.5% to 13%, whereas the combination of Venetoclax/HMA, initially not available, increased from 0% to 36.7%. Objective treatment-specific fitness criteria proposed by SIE/SIES/GITMO in 2013 allow an appropriate choice between ICT and HMAs by balancing their efficacy and toxicity. Venetoclax/HMA, registered for patients unfit to ICT, has a unique toxicity profile because of prolonged granulocytopenia and increased infectious risk. Aiming at defining specific fitness criteria for the safe use of Venetoclax/HMA, a preliminary investigation was conducted among expert REL hematologists, asking for modifications of SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria they used to select candidates for Venetoclax/HMA. While opinions among experts varied, a general consensus emerged on restricting SIE/SIES/GITMO criteria for ICT-unfit patients to an age limit of 80-85, cardiac function > 40%, and absence of recurrent lung infections, bronchiectasis, or exacerbating COPD. Also, the presence of an adequate caregiver was considered mandatory. Such expert opinions may be clinically useful and may be considered when treatment-specific fitness criteria are updated to include Venetoclax/HMA.
在伦巴第血液学网络(REL)的血液学中心对2020年至2022年间诊治的529例老年急性髓系白血病(AML)患者进行了回顾性调查。与2008年至2016年相比,强化化疗(ICT)的使用从40%降至18.1%,去甲基化药物(HMA)的使用从19.5%降至13%,而最初无法使用的维奈克拉/HMA联合治疗的使用从0%增至36.7%。意大利血液学会(SIE)/意大利血液学和干细胞移植学会(SIES)/意大利肿瘤协作组(GITMO)在2013年提出的客观的特定治疗适用性标准,通过平衡ICT和HMA的疗效与毒性,使得在两者之间能够做出恰当选择。维奈克拉/HMA是为不适于ICT的患者注册的,由于粒细胞缺乏持续时间延长和感染风险增加,其具有独特的毒性特征。为了确定安全使用维奈克拉/HMA的特定适用性标准,在REL血液学专家中进行了一项初步调查,询问他们对用于选择维奈克拉/HMA候选患者的SIE/SIES/GITMO标准的修改意见。虽然专家们的意见各不相同,但在将SIE/SIES/GITMO针对不适于ICT患者的标准限制为年龄上限80 - 85岁、心功能>40%以及无反复肺部感染、支气管扩张或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重方面达成了普遍共识。此外,有一名合适的照料者也被认为是必需的。这些专家意见可能在临床上有用,并且在更新特定治疗适用性标准以纳入维奈克拉/HMA时可能会被考虑。