Gonçalves Aline, Monteiro Francisca, Oliveira Sofia, Costa Inês, Catarino Susana O, Carvalho Óscar, Padrão Jorge, Zille Andrea, Pinho Teresa, Silva Filipe S
UNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
Center for MicroElectroMechanical Systems (CMEMS), University of Minho, Campus Azurém, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal.
Biomedicines. 2024 Jan 14;12(1):180. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12010180.
Numerous pieces of evidence have supported the therapeutic potential of photobiomodulation (PBM) to modulate bone remodeling on mechanically stimulated teeth, proving PBM's ability to be used as a coadjuvant treatment to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). However, there are still uncertainty and discourse around the optimal PBM protocols, which hampers its optimal and consolidated clinical applicability. Given the differential expression and metabolic patterns exhibited in the tension and compression sides of orthodontically stressed teeth, it is plausible that different types of irradiation may be applied to each side of the teeth. In this sense, this study aimed to design and implement an optimization protocol to find the most appropriate PBM parameters to stimulate specific bone turnover processes. To this end, three levels of wavelength (655, 810 and 940 nm), two power densities (5 and 10 mW/cm) and two regimens of single and multiple sessions within three consecutive days were tested. The biological response of osteoblasts and periodontal ligament (PDL) fibroblasts was addressed by monitoring the PBM's impact on the cellular metabolic activity, as well as on key bone remodeling mediators, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor κ-B ligand (RANK-L), each day. The results suggest that daily irradiation of 655 nm delivered at 10 mW/cm, as well as 810 and 940 nm light at 5 mW/cm, lead to an increase in ALP and OPG, potentiating bone formation. In addition, irradiation of 810 nm at 5 mW/cm delivered for two consecutive days and suspended by the third day promotes a downregulation of OPG expression and a slight non-significant increase in RANK-L expression, being suitable to stimulate bone resorption. Future studies in animal models may clarify the impact of PBM on bone formation and resorption mediators for longer periods and address the possibility of testing different stimulation periodicities. The present in vitro study offers valuable insights into the effectiveness of specific PBM protocols to promote osteogenic and osteoclastogenesis responses and therefore its potential to stimulate bone formation on the tension side and bone resorption on the compression side of orthodontically stressed teeth.
大量证据支持光生物调节作用(PBM)在调节机械刺激牙齿的骨重塑方面具有治疗潜力,证明了PBM可作为辅助治疗手段来加速正畸牙齿移动(OTM)。然而,围绕最佳PBM方案仍存在不确定性和争议,这阻碍了其最佳且统一的临床应用。鉴于正畸受力牙齿的张力侧和压缩侧表现出不同的表达和代谢模式,对牙齿两侧应用不同类型的照射可能是合理的。从这个意义上讲,本研究旨在设计并实施一种优化方案,以找到最合适的PBM参数来刺激特定的骨转换过程。为此,测试了三个波长水平(655、810和940 nm)、两种功率密度(5和10 mW/cm)以及连续三天内单次和多次照射的两种方案。通过监测PBM对细胞代谢活性以及关键骨重塑介质(包括碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、骨保护素(OPG)和核因子κ-B受体活化因子配体(RANK-L))的影响,研究成骨细胞和牙周膜(PDL)成纤维细胞的生物学反应。结果表明,每天以10 mW/cm的功率照射655 nm,以及以5 mW/cm的功率照射810和940 nm的光,会导致ALP和OPG增加,促进骨形成。此外,连续两天以5 mW/cm的功率照射810 nm并在第三天暂停照射,会促进OPG表达下调以及RANK-L表达略有增加但无统计学意义,适合刺激骨吸收。未来在动物模型中的研究可能会阐明PBM对骨形成和吸收介质的长期影响,并探讨测试不同刺激周期的可能性。本体外研究为特定PBM方案促进成骨和破骨细胞生成反应的有效性提供了有价值的见解,因此也为其刺激正畸受力牙齿张力侧骨形成和压缩侧骨吸收的潜力提供了见解。