Suppr超能文献

德国人群饮食失调检查问卷的临界分数。

Cutoff scores of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for the German population.

作者信息

Meule Adrian, Hilbert Anja, de Zwaan Martina, Brähler Elmar, Koch Stefan, Voderholzer Ulrich

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Schoen Clinic Roseneck, Prien am Chiemsee, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Mar;57(3):602-610. doi: 10.1002/eat.24133. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is one of the most widely used self-report measures for the assessment of eating disorder (ED) symptomatology. However, proposed cutoff scores that may indicate the presence of an ED have been heterogeneous. Therefore, the current study derived cutoff scores from two large samples: one representative for the German population and one composed of persons with EDs at admission to inpatient treatment.

METHOD

Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used with the EDE-Q global score as independent variable and group (controls: n = 2519, patients: n = 2038) as dependent variable. These analyses were also conducted separately with the patient group divided into persons with anorexia nervosa (AN; n = 1456), bulimia nervosa (BN; n = 370), and other EDs (n = 212) and after matching groups for age and sex distribution.

RESULTS

The EDE-Q global score discriminated well between controls and patients (AUC >91%, sensitivity >.84, specificity >.79). A score of 1.6 discriminated best between controls and patients in general and persons with AN in particular. Optimal thresholds for discriminating between controls and persons with BN and other EDs ranged between scores of 1.8 and 2.4.

DISCUSSION

In the German population, cutoff scores between 1.6 and 2.4 may be used to screen for the presence or absence of an ED or evaluate treatment outcome, with slightly higher cutoff scores for persons with BN and other EDs than for persons with AN.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

Questionnaire scores have little value when it is unclear which scores indicate the likely presence of an ED, as such scores can be used to estimate the prevalence of or screen for EDs in the general population and evaluate outcome at the end of ED treatment. The current study indicates a score around 2 on the EDE-Q as an optimal threshold for this.

摘要

目的

《饮食失调检查问卷》(EDE-Q)是评估饮食失调(ED)症状最广泛使用的自我报告测量工具之一。然而,用于表明存在饮食失调的建议临界分数一直存在差异。因此,本研究从两个大样本中得出临界分数:一个代表德国人群,另一个由住院治疗入院时患有饮食失调症的人组成。

方法

采用接受者操作特征分析,将EDE-Q总分作为自变量,将组别(对照组:n = 2519,患者组:n = 2038)作为因变量。这些分析也分别在将患者组分为神经性厌食症(AN;n = 1456)、神经性贪食症(BN;n = 370)和其他饮食失调症(n = 212)的情况下进行,并在按年龄和性别分布匹配组别之后进行。

结果

EDE-Q总分在对照组和患者组之间有良好区分度(曲线下面积>91%,敏感性>.84,特异性>.79)。分数为1.6时,总体上在对照组和患者组之间,尤其是在神经性厌食症患者之间区分效果最佳。区分对照组与神经性贪食症患者及其他饮食失调症患者的最佳阈值分数在1.8至2.4之间。

讨论

在德国人群中,1.6至2.4之间的临界分数可用于筛查饮食失调的存在与否或评估治疗结果,神经性贪食症患者及其他饮食失调症患者的临界分数略高于神经性厌食症患者。

公共意义

当不清楚哪些分数表明可能存在饮食失调时,问卷分数价值不大,因为这些分数可用于估计普通人群中饮食失调的患病率或进行筛查,并在饮食失调治疗结束时评估结果。本研究表明EDE-Q上约2分的分数是最佳阈值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验