Pliatskidou S, Samakouri M, Kalamara E, Papageorgiou E, Koutrouvi K, Goulemtzakis C, Nikolaou E, Livaditis M
Mental Health Center of Orestiada, Orestiada.
Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Psychiatriki. 2015 Jul-Sep;26(3):204-16.
The aim of this study is to examine the validity of the Greek version of the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire 6.0 (EDE-Q-6.0) in a sample of adolescent pupils. EDE-Q is a self- report instrument that assesses attitudes and behaviors related to Eating Disorders (EDs). A two-stage identification protocol has been applied to the 16 schools that agreed to participate in the present study. Initially, 2058 adolescents, in class under the supervision of one research assistant and one teacher, completed a Questionnaire on socio-demographic data, the Greek EDE-Q-6.0 and the Greek Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) while their weight and height were measured. Six-hundred and twenty six participants, who had scores on EAT-26≥20 and/or were underweight or overweight, were considered as "possible-cases" while the remaining 1432 pupils of the sample were thought as "non-possible cases". At the second stage, parents of 66 of the participants identified as possible-cases as well as parents of 72 participants from 358 controls randomly selected from the sample of "non-possible cases" agreed that their children would be examined by means of Best Estimate Diagnostic Procedure. Participants meeting DSM-IV-TR Eating Disorders criteria were identified. Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis was applied to reveal EDE-Q's criterion validity. The kappa statistic test was used as measure of agreement between categorical variables at EDE-Q and at interview (the presence of objective binge eating episode, of self-induced vomiting, the use of laxatives and of excessive exercise). The Discriminant and Convergent validity were assessed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test and by means of the Spearman's correlation coefficient, respectively. Nineteen cases of EDs were identified [one case of Anorexia Nervosa (AN), 13 cases of Eating Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (EDNOS), 5 cases of Binge Eating Disorder (BED)]. At the cut off point of 2.6125 on the EDE-Q's global scale the instrument screens with a sensitivity (Se) of 89.5% and a specificity (Sp) of 73.1%, a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 34.7% and a Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 97.8% The same analyses for both sexes revealed a cut-off point of 2.612 for females and of 3.125 for males on the global EDE-Q-6.0 score (Se=84.62%, Sp=73.33% for females and Se=83.33%, Sp= 84.09% for males), yielding a PPV and a NPV of 35.5% and of 96.5% for females and 41.7% and 97.4% for males, respectively. A very low agreement level, between EDE-Q and interview, was observed regarding the presence of objective bulimic episodes (OBEs) [k=0.191 (SE=0.057)] and the unhealthy weight control behaviors [k=0.295 (SE=0.073)]. Positive correlations were found between EAT-26 and EDE-Q-6.0 for both global scale and subscales (rho=0.50-0.57). The results suggest that EDE-Q-6.0, when using its global score, appears to be a proper screening tool for assessing the core psychopathology of eating disorders in community samples in two-stage screening studies since it distinguishes very well the cases from the non-cases. However, the assessment of the presence and frequency of pathological behaviours which characterize EDs appears to be problematic since adolescents, especially the younger ones, misunderstood terms like large amount of food and loss of control or misinterpret the motivation for excessive exercise. Therefore, marked discrepancies were observed between pathological behaviors self-reported at questionnaire and those detected at interview. We may assume that giving participants more information regarding the definition of these concepts may increase the accuracy with which the participants report these behaviors.
本研究旨在检验青少年学生样本中希腊版《饮食失调检查问卷6.0》(EDE-Q-6.0)的有效性。EDE-Q是一种自我报告工具,用于评估与饮食失调(ED)相关的态度和行为。已对同意参与本研究的16所学校应用了两阶段识别方案。最初,2058名青少年在一名研究助理和一名教师的监督下在课堂上完成了一份关于社会人口统计学数据的问卷、希腊版EDE-Q-6.0和希腊饮食态度测试(EAT-26),同时测量了他们的体重和身高。626名在EAT-26上得分≥20和/或体重过轻或超重的参与者被视为“可能病例”,而样本中其余1432名学生被视为“非可能病例”。在第二阶段,66名被确定为可能病例的参与者的父母以及从“非可能病例”样本中随机选择的358名对照中的72名参与者的父母同意他们的孩子将通过最佳估计诊断程序进行检查。确定了符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版修订版》(DSM-IV-TR)饮食失调标准的参与者。应用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析来揭示EDE-Q的标准效度。kappa统计检验用作EDE-Q和访谈中分类变量之间一致性的度量(客观暴饮暴食发作、自我催吐、使用泻药和过度运动的存在情况)。分别使用非参数曼-惠特尼U检验和斯皮尔曼相关系数评估判别效度和聚合效度。确定了19例饮食失调病例[1例神经性厌食症(AN)、13例未另行指定的饮食失调(EDNOS)、5例暴饮暴食症(BED)]。在EDE-Q的全球量表上,截断点为2.6125时,该工具的筛查灵敏度(Se)为89.5%,特异性(Sp)为73.1%,阳性预测值(PPV)为34.7%,阴性预测值(NPV)为97.8%。对两性进行的相同分析显示,在全球EDE-Q-6.0评分上,女性的截断点为2.612,男性为3.125(女性的Se = 84.62%,Sp = 73.33%;男性的Se = 83.33%,Sp = 84.09%),女性的PPV和NPV分别为35.5%和96.5%,男性为41.7%和97.4%。在客观贪食发作(OBE)的存在情况[k = 0.191(SE = 0.057)]和不健康体重控制行为[k = 0.295(SE = 0.073)]方面,观察到EDE-Q与访谈之间的一致性水平非常低。在全球量表和子量表上,EAT-26与EDE-Q-6.0之间均发现正相关(rho = 0.50 - 0.57)。结果表明,在两阶段筛查研究中,当使用其全球评分时,EDE-Q-6.0似乎是评估社区样本中饮食失调核心精神病理学的合适筛查工具,因为它能很好地区分病例和非病例。然而,对表征饮食失调的病理行为的存在情况和频率的评估似乎存在问题,因为青少年,尤其是年龄较小的青少年,误解了诸如大量食物和失控等术语,或者误解了过度运动的动机。因此,在问卷中自我报告的病理行为与访谈中检测到的行为之间观察到明显差异。我们可以假设,向参与者提供更多关于这些概念定义的信息可能会提高参与者报告这些行为的准确性。