Suppr超能文献

[内镜下真空疗法在食管穿孔微创治疗中的应用]

[Endoscopic vacuum therapy in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforations].

作者信息

Gasanov M A, Danielyan Sh N, Chernousov F A, Gasanov A M, Rabadanov K M, Tatarinova E V, Barmina T G, Titova G P, Nevdah S K

机构信息

Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia.

National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia.

出版信息

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2024(1):21-28. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202401121.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions.

RESULTS

Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, =0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, =0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (=4) and 29% (=9), respectively (=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, =0.035) compared to traditional surgery.

CONCLUSION

EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.

摘要

目的

比较内镜下真空治疗(EVT)与开放手术治疗食管穿孔的效果。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2010年至2022年间60例食管穿孔患者。主要组包括29例行EVT微创治疗的患者,对照组包括31例行开放手术干预后的患者。

结果

肺炎分别发生在21例(72%)和14例(45%)患者中(P=0.04),穿孔区域内食管狭窄分别发生在4例(13.8%)和1例(3.2%)患者中(P=0.188)。慢性食管瘘在对照组中明显更常见(6例(20.7%)对15例(48.4%)患者,P=0.032)。主要组幸存者的总体治疗时间(中位数)明显更短:33(23;48)天对71.5(59;93.7)天(P=0.5)。然而,重症监护病房住院时间略长(11(6;16)天对8.5(5;12.75)天,P=0.32)。死亡率分别为13.8%(4例)和29%(9例)(P=0.213)。与传统手术相比,微创技术使致命结局的风险降低了10倍(OR 10.123,95%CI 1.491-124.97,P=0.035)。

结论

与传统手术方法相比,EVT在机械性食管损伤患者的复杂微创治疗中是一种有效的方法,可显著降低死亡率和住院治疗时间。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验