Gasanov M A, Danielyan Sh N, Chernousov F A, Gasanov A M, Rabadanov K M, Tatarinova E V, Barmina T G, Titova G P, Nevdah S K
Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Care, Moscow, Russia.
National Institute of Health, Yerevan, Armenia.
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2024(1):21-28. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202401121.
To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations.
The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions.
Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, =0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, =0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (=4) and 29% (=9), respectively (=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, =0.035) compared to traditional surgery.
EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.
比较内镜下真空治疗(EVT)与开放手术治疗食管穿孔的效果。
本研究纳入了2010年至2022年间60例食管穿孔患者。主要组包括29例行EVT微创治疗的患者,对照组包括31例行开放手术干预后的患者。
肺炎分别发生在21例(72%)和14例(45%)患者中(P=0.04),穿孔区域内食管狭窄分别发生在4例(13.8%)和1例(3.2%)患者中(P=0.188)。慢性食管瘘在对照组中明显更常见(6例(20.7%)对15例(48.4%)患者,P=0.032)。主要组幸存者的总体治疗时间(中位数)明显更短:33(23;48)天对71.5(59;93.7)天(P=0.5)。然而,重症监护病房住院时间略长(11(6;16)天对8.5(5;12.75)天,P=0.32)。死亡率分别为13.8%(4例)和29%(9例)(P=0.213)。与传统手术相比,微创技术使致命结局的风险降低了10倍(OR 10.123,95%CI 1.491-124.97,P=0.035)。
与传统手术方法相比,EVT在机械性食管损伤患者的复杂微创治疗中是一种有效的方法,可显著降低死亡率和住院治疗时间。