Evaluating the Efficacy of a Novel Side-Support Surgical Tray Stand for Endoscopic Transnasal Skull Base Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Objective Endoscopic transnasal skull base surgery is a valuable technique used in the surgical treatment of various skull base pathologies. In such surgeries, the reconstruction of the skull base is crucial for surgical success and minimizing complications. This study presents a new side-support surgical tray designed to improve the exposure of the lateral femoral surgical area during surgery, enhancing surgical efficiency and reducing the risk of surgical complications. The study compared this innovative tray stand with the conventional double-sided support tray stand to evaluate its impact on surgical procedures and complications. Materials and methods The study prospectively analyzed 248 endoscopic transnasal skull base surgeries requiring lateral femoral autologous tissue harvesting. One hundred fifty-eight cases were performed using the side-support surgical tray stand (experimental group), while 90 cases used the conventional double-sided support tray stand (control group). Various parameters were evaluated, including satisfaction scores of surgeons, circulating nurses, instrument nurses, and anesthetists, as well as objective outcomes such as surgical duration and the incidence of complications. Results Surgeons in the experimental group expressed higher satisfaction with the surgical field exposure and the portability of the surgical tray stand compared to the control group. Likewise, circulating nurses in the experimental group reported greater satisfaction with the installation and portability, surpassing that of the control group (< 0.01). Although the stability of instrument nurses in the experimental group was slightly less than that of the control group, it had no discernible impact on surgical cooperation. Anaesthesiologists in the experimental group exhibited higher satisfaction regarding the convenience of intraoperative monitoring and management than their counterparts in the control group. The average duration required for intraoperative autologous tissue harvesting in the experimental group was significantly shorter than in the control group ( < 0.01). Furthermore, the incidence of postoperative wound infections and intracranial infections in the experimental group was notably lower than in the control group (would infections,  = 0.046; intracranial infection,  = 0.025). Conclusion The novel side-support surgical tray stand effectively improves surgical exposure, convenience, and safety while reducing the risk of surgical site and intracranial infections. It also shortens surgical duration and lowers complication rates, making it a suitable choice for clinical application.