Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂在冠状动脉微血管功能障碍中的疗效:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Efficacy of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors in Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Abouzid Mohamed R, Eldahtoury Samar, Elshafei Shorouk M, Devi Sunita, Saleh Amr, Esteghamati Sadaf, Kamel Ibrahim

机构信息

Internal Medicine, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, USA.

Internal Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, EGY.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Jan 21;16(1):e52684. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52684. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is becoming increasingly recognized as an important contributor to the development of ischemic heart diseases. Without obstructive coronary artery disease, the physiological function of the coronary microcirculation can be altered by structural, functional, and molecular factors, leading to myocardial ischemia. CMD can significantly impact the quality of life and prognosis and imposes a huge financial burden on healthcare systems and people. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) for treating CMD. A systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ACEIs with placebo in CMD patients. Review Manager, 5.3 for Windows, was utilized. Using the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) method, improvement in coronary flow reserve (CFR) and systolic blood pressure events was pooled as mean difference (MD) in a meta-analysis model with a fixed effect model, whereas the number of chest pain episodes was pooled as MD with a random effect model. Five randomized controlled trials involving 209 patients were included in the analysis. The analysis demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in CFR in the ACEIs group compared to the placebo group (MD -0.3, 95% CI -0.61 to 0.01, P = 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the number of chest pain episodes between the ACEIs and placebo groups (MD 1.79, 95% CI -3.99 to 7.58, P = 0.54). Similarly, no significant difference in blood pressure change was observed between the two groups (MD 4.02, 95% CI -3.25 to 11.28, P = 0.28). In conclusion, the appropriate treatment for CMD is a source of contention because adequate data is lacking. Our findings suggest that ACEIs may have a positive effect on improving CFR in patients with microvascular angina. However, ACEIs did not demonstrate a significant impact on the number of chest pain episodes or systolic blood pressure in this patient population. Further research, including RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations, is warranted to provide more conclusive evidence on the role of ACEIs in CMD management.

摘要

冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)日益被认为是缺血性心脏病发展的一个重要因素。在没有阻塞性冠状动脉疾病的情况下,冠状动脉微循环的生理功能可因结构、功能和分子因素而改变,导致心肌缺血。CMD会显著影响生活质量和预后,并给医疗系统和个人带来巨大经济负担。这项荟萃分析旨在研究血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)治疗CMD的疗效。一项系统的文献综述确定了比较ACEIs与安慰剂治疗CMD患者的随机对照试验(RCTs)。使用了适用于Windows的Review Manager 5.3。采用Mantel-Haenszel(M-H)方法,在固定效应模型的荟萃分析模型中,将冠状动脉血流储备(CFR)的改善和收缩压事件合并为平均差(MD),而胸痛发作次数则采用随机效应模型合并为MD。分析纳入了5项涉及209例患者的随机对照试验。分析表明,与安慰剂组相比,ACEIs组的CFR有统计学意义的改善(MD -0.3,95%CI -0.61至0.01,P = 0.05)。然而,ACEIs组和安慰剂组之间的胸痛发作次数没有显著差异(MD 1.79,95%CI -3.99至7.58,P = 0.54)。同样,两组之间的血压变化也没有显著差异(MD 4.02,95%CI -3.25至11.28,P = 0.28)。总之,由于缺乏足够的数据,CMD的适当治疗存在争议。我们的研究结果表明,ACEIs可能对改善微血管性心绞痛患者的CFR有积极作用。然而,在该患者群体中,ACEIs对胸痛发作次数或收缩压没有显著影响。有必要进行进一步的研究,包括样本量更大、随访时间更长的RCTs以提供关于ACEIs在CMD管理中作用的更确凿证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/23c2/10801115/5c99dda9fde9/cureus-0016-00000052684-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验