Suppr超能文献

心肌梗死后左心室重构的模式、决定因素和结局。

Patterns of left ventricular remodeling post-myocardial infarction, determinants, and outcome.

机构信息

UMR-S 942 MASCOT, Université Paris Cité and Inserm, Paris, France.

Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, 75010, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Dec;113(12):1670-1681. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02331-z. Epub 2024 Jan 23.

Abstract

AIM

Left ventricular remodeling (LVR) after myocardial infarction (MI) can lead to heart failure, arrhythmia, and death. We aim to describe adverse LVR patterns at 6 months post-MI and their relationships with subsequent outcomes and to determine baseline.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multicenter cohort of 410 patients (median age 57 years, 87% male) with reperfused MI and at least 3 akinetic LV segments on admission was analyzed. All patients had transthoracic echocardiography performed 4 days and 6 months post-MI, and 214 also had cardiac magnetic resonance imaging performed on day 4. To predict LVR, machine learning methods were employed in order to handle many variables, some of which may have complex interactions. Six months post-MI, echocardiographic increases in LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were 14.1% [interquartile range 0.0, 32.0], 5.0% [- 14.0, 25.8], and 8.7% [0.0, 19.4], respectively. At 6 months, ≥ 15% or 20% increases in LVEDV were observed in 49% and 42% of patients, respectively, and 37% had an LVEF < 50%. The rate of death or new-onset HF at the end of 5-year follow-up was 8.8%. Baseline variables associated with adverse LVR were determined best by random forest analysis and included stroke volume, stroke work, necrosis size, LVEDV, LVEF, and LV afterload, the latter assessed by Ea or Ea/Ees. In contrast, baseline clinical and biological characteristics were poorly predictive of LVR. After adjustment for predictive baseline variables, LV dilation > 20% and 6-month LVEF < 50% were significantly associated with the risk of death and/or heart failure: hazard ratio (HR) 2.12 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-4.43; p = 0.04) and HR 2.68 (95% CI 1.20-6.00; p = 0.016) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Despite early reperfusion and cardioprotective therapy, adverse LVR remains frequent after acute MI and is associated with a risk of death and HF. A machine learning approach identified and prioritized early variables that are associated with adverse LVR and which were mainly hemodynamic, combining LV volumes, estimates of systolic function, and afterload.

摘要

目的

心肌梗死后的左心室重构(LVR)可导致心力衰竭、心律失常和死亡。我们旨在描述心肌梗死后 6 个月时不良的 LVR 模式及其与随后结局的关系,并确定基线情况。

方法和结果

对接受再灌注治疗的心肌梗死后至少有 3 个节段左室射血分数(LVEF)无运动的 410 例患者(中位年龄 57 岁,87%为男性)进行了多中心队列分析。所有患者在心肌梗死后 4 天和 6 个月时均进行了经胸超声心动图检查,其中 214 例患者在第 4 天还进行了心脏磁共振成像检查。为了预测 LVR,采用机器学习方法来处理许多变量,其中一些变量可能具有复杂的相互作用。6 个月时,超声心动图测量的 LV 舒张末期容积(LVEDV)、LV 收缩末期容积(LVESV)和 LVEF 的增加分别为 14.1%[四分位距(IQR)0.0,32.0]、5.0%[-14.0,25.8]和 8.7%[0.0,19.4]。6 个月时,49%和 42%的患者分别出现≥15%或≥20%的 LVEDV 增加,37%的患者出现 LVEF<50%。在 5 年随访结束时,死亡或新发心力衰竭的发生率为 8.8%。随机森林分析确定的与不良 LVR 相关的基线变量包括:每搏量、每搏功、坏死面积、LVEDV、LVEF 和 LV 后负荷,后者由 Ea 或 Ea/Ees 评估。相比之下,基线临床和生物学特征对 LVR 的预测能力较差。在调整预测性基线变量后,LV 扩张>20%和 6 个月时 LVEF<50%与死亡和/或心力衰竭的风险显著相关:风险比(HR)2.12(95%置信区间(CI)1.05-4.43;p=0.04)和 HR 2.68(95%CI 1.20-6.00;p=0.016)。

结论

尽管早期进行了再灌注和心脏保护治疗,但急性心肌梗死后仍常出现不良的 LVR,且与死亡和心力衰竭的风险相关。机器学习方法确定并优先考虑了与不良 LVR 相关的早期变量,这些变量主要是血流动力学的,包括 LV 容积、收缩功能评估和后负荷。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验