Department of Primary Care Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Innere Medizin, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland.
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 22;14(1):e077411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077411.
This study aims to understand reasons for vaccine hesitancy (VH) among general practioners (GPs) and paediatricians. We aim to analyse how and when the healthcare workers (HCWs) developed vaccine-hesitant views and how they transfer these to patients.
Semistructured interviews with vaccine-hesitant GPs and paediatricians were conducted in Austria and Germany using an explorative qualitative research design.
We contacted 41 physicians through letters and emails and 10 agreed to participate, five were male and five female.
Ten interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and anonymised. The material was analysed inductively following a grounded theory approach with open coding using the software atlas.ti.
Key themes that were identified were education and career path, understanding of medicine and medical profession, experiences with vaccines, doctor-patient interactions and continuous education activities and the link to VH. GPs and paediatricians' vaccine-hesitant attitudes developed during their medical training and, in particular, during extracurricular training in homeopathy, which most of the participants completed. Most participants work in private practices rather than with contracts with social insurance because they are not satisfied with the health system. Furthermore, they are critical of biomedicine. Most of the interview partners do not consider themselves antivaccination, but are sceptical towards vaccines and especially point out the side effects. Most do not vaccinate in their practices and some do only occasionally. Their vaccine-hesitant views are often fostered through respective online communities of vaccine-hesitant HCWs.
More studies on a connection between complementary medicine and vaccine-hesitant views of HCWs are needed. Education about vaccines and infectious diseases among healthworkers must increase especially tailored towards the use of internet and social media. Physicians should be made aware that through time and empathy towards their patients they could have a positive impact on undecided patients and parents regarding vaccine decisions.
本研究旨在了解全科医生和儿科医生对疫苗犹豫(VH)的原因。我们旨在分析卫生保健工作者(HCWs)何时以及如何产生疫苗犹豫的观点,并将其如何传递给患者。
使用探索性定性研究设计,在奥地利和德国对持疫苗犹豫态度的全科医生和儿科医生进行半结构式访谈。
我们通过信件和电子邮件联系了 41 名医生,其中 10 人同意参加,其中 5 名是男性,5 名是女性。
记录了 10 次访谈,逐字转录并匿名化。使用 atlas.ti 软件,采用扎根理论方法和开放式编码对材料进行分析。
确定的主要主题是教育和职业道路、对医学和医疗职业的理解、疫苗接种经验、医患互动以及继续教育活动与 VH 的联系。全科医生和儿科医生的疫苗犹豫态度是在他们的医学培训中形成的,特别是在顺势疗法的课外培训中形成的,大多数参与者都完成了这项培训。大多数参与者在私人诊所工作,而不是与医疗保险签订合同,因为他们对卫生系统不满意。此外,他们对生物医学持批评态度。大多数访谈对象不认为自己是反疫苗接种者,但对疫苗持怀疑态度,尤其是指出了疫苗的副作用。他们中的大多数人在实践中不接种疫苗,有些人只是偶尔接种。他们的疫苗犹豫观点往往通过持疫苗犹豫态度的 HCWs 的相应在线社区得到加强。
需要更多研究补充医学与 HCWs 疫苗犹豫观点之间的联系。必须特别针对互联网和社交媒体,增加卫生工作者关于疫苗和传染病的教育。应让医生意识到,随着时间的推移,以及对患者的同情,他们可以对犹豫不决的患者和父母在疫苗决策方面产生积极影响。