• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支血管病变心肌梗死患者残余冠状动脉病变对结局的影响。

Impact of residual coronary lesions on outcomes of myocardial infarction patients with multi-vessel disease.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Assiut University Heart Hospital, Assiut University, Assiut, 71526, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03657-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-023-03657-2
PMID:38262995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10804526/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The residual burden of coronary artery disease (CAD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) drew a growing interest. The residual SYNTAX Score (rSS) was a strong prognostic factor of adverse events and all-cause mortality in patients who underwent PCI. In addition, the SYNTAX Revascularization Index (SRI), a derivative of rSS, was used to figure out the treated proportion of CAD and could be used as a prognostic utility in PCI for patients with multi-vessel disease (MVD).

PURPOSE

We aimed at the assessment of the use of rSS and the SRI as predictors of in-hospital outcomes and up to two-year cumulative follow-up outcomes in patients with MVD who had PCI for the treatment of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) or Non-STEMI (NSTEMI).

METHODS

We recruited 149 patients who had either STEMI or NSTEMI while having MVD and received treatment with PCI. We divided them into tertiles based on their rSS and SRI values. We calculated baseline SYNTAX Score (bSS) and rSS using the latest version of the calculator on the internet, and we used both scores to calculate SRI. The study end-points were In-hospital composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) and its components, in-hospital death, and follow-up cumulative MACE up to 2 years.

RESULTS

Neither rSS nor SRI were significant predictors of in-hospital adverse events, while female sex, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction were independent predictors of in-hospital MACE. At the two-year follow-up, Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a significantly increased incidence of MACE within the third rSS tertile (rSS > 12) compared to other tertiles (log rank p = 0.03). At the same time, there was no significant difference between the three SRI tertiles. Unlike SRI, rSS was a significant predictor of cumulative MACE on univariate Cox regression (HR = 1.037, p < 0.001). On multivariate Cox regression, rSS was a significant independent predictor of two-year cumulative MACE (HR = 1.038, p = 0.0025) along with female sex, hypertension, and left ventricular ejection fraction. We also noted that all patients with complete revascularization survived well throughout the entire follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither rSS nor SRI could be good predictors of in-hospital MACE, while the rSS was a good predictor of MACE at two-year follow-up. Patients with rSS values > 12 had a significantly higher incidence of cumulative MACE after 2 years. The best prognosis was achieved with complete revascularization.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的残余负担引起了越来越多的关注。残余 SYNTAX 评分(rSS)是接受 PCI 治疗的患者不良事件和全因死亡率的强有力预后因素。此外,rSS 的衍生指标 SYNTAX 血运重建指数(SRI)用于计算 CAD 的治疗比例,并可作为多血管疾病(MVD)患者 PCI 的预后指标。

目的

我们旨在评估 rSS 和 SRI 作为预测因子的作用,这些预测因子用于预测 MVD 患者因 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)或非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)而行 PCI 治疗的住院期间和两年累积随访结局。

方法

我们招募了 149 名患有 MVD 且因 STEMI 或 NSTEMI 而接受 PCI 治疗的患者。我们根据 rSS 和 SRI 值将他们分为三组。我们使用互联网上最新版本的计算器计算基线 SYNTAX 评分(bSS)和 rSS,并使用这两个评分计算 SRI。研究终点是住院期间复合主要不良心血管事件(MACE)及其组成部分、住院期间死亡以及随访至 2 年的累积 MACE。

结果

rSS 和 SRI 均不是住院期间不良事件的显著预测因子,而女性、高血压和左心室射血分数是住院期间 MACE 的独立预测因子。在两年的随访中,Kaplan-Meier 分析显示,与其他两组相比,rSS 第三组(rSS>12)的 MACE 发生率显著增加(对数秩检验 p=0.03)。同时,三组 SRI 之间没有显著差异。与 SRI 不同,rSS 是单变量 Cox 回归中累积 MACE 的显著预测因子(HR=1.037,p<0.001)。多变量 Cox 回归分析显示,rSS 是两年累积 MACE 的显著独立预测因子(HR=1.038,p=0.0025),同时还有女性、高血压和左心室射血分数。我们还注意到,所有完全血运重建的患者在整个随访期间均存活良好。

结论

rSS 和 SRI 均不能很好地预测住院期间的 MACE,而 rSS 是两年随访时 MACE 的良好预测因子。rSS 值>12 的患者在 2 年后累积 MACE 的发生率显著升高。完全血运重建可获得最佳预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/d69ba6dc1533/12872_2023_3657_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/61089ce7b8d9/12872_2023_3657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/327130b0b6c4/12872_2023_3657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/92452acc5f66/12872_2023_3657_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/5cf083c79b88/12872_2023_3657_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/672a6c596029/12872_2023_3657_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/d69ba6dc1533/12872_2023_3657_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/61089ce7b8d9/12872_2023_3657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/327130b0b6c4/12872_2023_3657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/92452acc5f66/12872_2023_3657_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/5cf083c79b88/12872_2023_3657_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/672a6c596029/12872_2023_3657_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc36/10804526/d69ba6dc1533/12872_2023_3657_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of residual coronary lesions on outcomes of myocardial infarction patients with multi-vessel disease.多支血管病变心肌梗死患者残余冠状动脉病变对结局的影响。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Jan 23;24(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03657-2.
2
Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score After Functionally Complete Revascularization in ACS.SYNTAX 评分残余值对 ACS 患者功能性完全血运重建后的预后价值。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Sep 18;72(12):1321-1329. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.069.
3
The Prognostic Value of Residual Coronary Stenoses After Functionally Complete Revascularization.功能完全血运重建后残余冠状动脉狭窄的预后价值。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 12;67(14):1701-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.056.
4
Comparison of multiple risk scores in assessing medium-to long-term clinical outcomes in unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing multi vessel percutaneous coronary intervention: An observational, registry-based study in India.比较多种风险评分在评估行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗多支血管不稳定型心绞痛/非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的中-长期临床结局中的作用:印度一项基于观察性登记研究。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Sep-Oct;73(5):555-560. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
5
Prognostic impact of residual SYNTAX score in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: Analysis of an 8-year all-comers registry.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者残余SYNTAX评分的预后影响:一项8年全人群注册研究分析
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:21-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.054. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
Predictive utility of residual SYNTAX score for clinical outcomes after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention.成功的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后残余 SYNTAX 评分对临床结局的预测作用。
Acta Cardiol. 2024 Sep;79(7):761-767. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2024.2392327. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
7
The predictive value of residual SYNTAX score and SYNTAX revascularization index for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.SYNTAX 评分残余值和 SYNTAX 血运重建指数对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者对比剂肾病的预测价值。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Aug;26(16):5793-5801. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202208_29517.
8
Proximal left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis should be considered when using the prognostic value of the residual SYNTAX score: Data from 10343 consecutive patients with long-term follow up in the real world.在使用残余SYNTAX评分的预后价值时,应考虑左前降支近端冠状动脉狭窄:来自10343例连续患者的真实世界长期随访数据。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(S1):639-645. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27524.
9
The impact of coronary artery disease severity on long-term outcomes in unprotected left main coronary artery revascularization.不稳定性心绞痛患者冠状动脉旁路移植术围术期不同时段的凝血标志物变化及临床意义
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2021 Jan;49(1):8-21. doi: 10.5543/tkda.2020.20576.
10
Reasonable incomplete revascularisation after percutaneous coronary intervention: the SYNTAX Revascularisation Index.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的合理不完全血运重建:SYNTAX 血运重建指数。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Oct;11(6):634-42. doi: 10.4244/EIJY14M10_05.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Complete Revascularization in STEMI: Ischemia-Driven Rehospitalization and Cardiovascular Mortality.ST段抬高型心肌梗死完全血运重建的效果:缺血驱动的再住院率和心血管死亡率。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 7;14(13):4793. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134793.

本文引用的文献

1
P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy versus Conventional Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者使用P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗与传统双联抗血小板治疗的Meta分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Feb 3;16(2):232. doi: 10.3390/ph16020232.
2
P2Y Inhibitor Monotherapy or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 P2Y 抑制剂单药治疗或双联抗血小板治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 14;81(6):537-552. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.041.
3
Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: From the STOPDAPT-2 Total Cohort.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后氯吡格雷单药治疗:来自 STOPDAPT-2 全队列研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Aug;15(8):e012004. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012004. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Very Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.药物洗脱支架植入术后极短期双联抗血小板治疗对急性冠状动脉综合征的疗效及安全性:一项随机临床试验的系统评价与Meta分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 7;8:660360. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.660360. eCollection 2021.
5
Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score on In-Hospital and Follow-Up Clinical Outcomes in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.残余SYNTAX评分对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者住院期间及随访临床结局的预后价值
Cardiol Res Pract. 2020 Oct 29;2020:9245431. doi: 10.1155/2020/9245431. eCollection 2020.
6
2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation.2020年欧洲心脏病学会非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南
Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 7;42(14):1289-1367. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa575.
7
Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多支血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1411-1421. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
8
2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
9
Defining Staged Procedures for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Trials: A Guidance Document.定义经皮冠状动脉介入治疗试验的分期程序:指导文件。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 May 14;11(9):823-832. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.044.
10
2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)与欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)合作制定的冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗重点更新:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)和欧洲心胸外科学会(EACTS)冠状动脉疾病双联抗血小板治疗特别工作组。
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 14;39(3):213-260. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx419.