• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤性脑损伤中的脑自动调节:超低频压力反应指数与各年龄段颅内压。

Cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury: ultra-low-frequency pressure reactivity index and intracranial pressure across age groups.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.

FROM Research Foundation, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2024 Jan 23;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04814-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13054-024-04814-5
PMID:38263241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10807228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ultra-low-frequency pressure reactivity index (UL-PRx) has been established as a surrogate method for bedside estimation of cerebral autoregulation (CA). Although this index has been shown to be a predictor of outcome in adult and pediatric patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), a comprehensive evaluation of low sampling rate data collection (0.0033 Hz averaged over 5 min) on cerebrovascular reactivity has never been performed.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the performance and predictive power of the UL-PRx for 12-month outcome measures, alongside all International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) models and in different age groups. To investigate the potential for optimal cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPopt).

METHODS

Demographic data, IMPACT variables, in-hospital mortality, and Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) at 12 months were extracted. Filtering and processing of the time series and creation of the indices (cerebral intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), UL-PRx, and deltaCPPopt (ΔCPPopt and CPPopt-CPP)) were performed using an in-house algorithm. Physiological parameters were assessed as follows: mean index value, % time above threshold, and mean hourly dose above threshold.

RESULTS

A total of 263 TBI patients were included: pediatric (17.5% aged ≤ 16 y) and adult (60.5% aged > 16 and < 70 y and 22.0% ≥ 70 y, respectively) patients. In-hospital and 12-month mortality were 25.9% and 32.7%, respectively, and 60.0% of patients had an unfavorable outcome at 12 months (GOSE). On univariate analysis, ICP, CPP, UL-PRx, and ΔCPPopt were associated with 12-month outcomes. The cutoff of ~ 20-22 for mean ICP and of ~ 0.30 for mean UL-PRx were confirmed in all age groups, except in patients older than 70 years. Mean UL-PRx remained significantly associated with 12-month outcomes even after adjustment for IMPACT models. This association was confirmed in all age groups. UL-PRx resulted associate with CPPopt.

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights UL-PRx as a tool for assessing CA and valuable outcome predictor for TBI patients. The results emphasize the potential clinical utility of the UL-PRx and its adaptability across different age groups, even after adjustment for IMPACT models. Furthermore, the correlation between UL-PRx and CPPopt suggests the potential for more targeted treatment strategies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05043545, principal investigator Paolo Gritti, date of registration 2021.08.21.

摘要

背景

超低频率压力反应指数(UL-PRx)已被确立为一种替代方法,用于床边估计脑自动调节(CA)。尽管该指数已被证明是创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的成年和儿科患者的预后预测指标,但从未对脑血管反应的低采样率数据采集(0.0033 Hz 平均 5 分钟)进行全面评估。

目的

评估 UL-PRx 在 12 个月的预后指标方面的性能和预测能力,以及所有国际预后和分析临床试验任务(IMPACT)模型,并在不同年龄组中进行评估。研究潜在的最佳脑灌注压(CPPopt)。

方法

提取人口统计学数据、IMPACT 变量、住院死亡率和 12 个月时的格拉斯哥预后量表扩展(GOSE)。使用内部算法对时间序列进行滤波和处理,并创建指数(脑颅内压(ICP)、脑灌注压(CPP)、UL-PRx 和 deltaCPPopt(ΔCPPopt 和 CPPopt-CPP))。评估生理参数如下:平均指数值、超过阈值的%时间和平均每小时超过阈值的剂量。

结果

共纳入 263 例 TBI 患者:儿科(17.5%年龄≤16 岁)和成年(60.5%年龄>16 岁和<70 岁,22.0%年龄≥70 岁)患者。住院和 12 个月的死亡率分别为 25.9%和 32.7%,12 个月时 60.0%的患者预后不良(GOSE)。单因素分析显示,ICP、CPP、UL-PRx 和 ΔCPPopt 与 12 个月的预后相关。在所有年龄组中,除了年龄大于 70 岁的患者外,平均 ICP 的截断值约为 20-22,平均 UL-PRx 的截断值约为 0.30。在调整了 IMPACT 模型后,平均 UL-PRx 仍然与 12 个月的预后显著相关。这一关联在所有年龄组中均得到证实。UL-PRx 与 CPPopt 相关。

结论

本研究强调了 UL-PRx 作为评估 CA 和 TBI 患者预后有价值的预测指标的工具。研究结果强调了 UL-PRx 的潜在临床应用价值及其在不同年龄组中的适应性,甚至在调整了 IMPACT 模型后也是如此。此外,UL-PRx 和 CPPopt 之间的相关性表明,可能需要更有针对性的治疗策略。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT05043545,主要研究者 Paolo Gritti,注册日期 2021.08.21。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/65697e7584a2/13054_2024_4814_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/89ca0badeb9d/13054_2024_4814_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/dd5851de3823/13054_2024_4814_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/24bedd89d4ea/13054_2024_4814_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/65697e7584a2/13054_2024_4814_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/89ca0badeb9d/13054_2024_4814_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/dd5851de3823/13054_2024_4814_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/24bedd89d4ea/13054_2024_4814_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b42/10807228/65697e7584a2/13054_2024_4814_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cerebral autoregulation in traumatic brain injury: ultra-low-frequency pressure reactivity index and intracranial pressure across age groups.创伤性脑损伤中的脑自动调节:超低频压力反应指数与各年龄段颅内压。
Crit Care. 2024 Jan 23;28(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04814-5.
2
Evaluation and application of ultra-low-frequency pressure reactivity index in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.超低频压力反应指数在小儿创伤性脑损伤患者中的评估与应用
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):865-874. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05538-1. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
3
Evaluation and Application of Ultra-Low-Resolution Pressure Reactivity Index in Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.超低压反应指数在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的评估与应用。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 1;35(3):313-321. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000847. Epub 2022 May 3.
4
Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in patients with severe traumatic brain injury based on minute-by-minute monitoring data.基于逐分钟监测数据的重型颅脑损伤患者压力自动调节监测及脑灌注压目标推荐
J Neurosurg. 2014 Jun;120(6):1451-7. doi: 10.3171/2014.3.JNS131500. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
5
Autoregulatory Management in Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Absolute Pressure Reactivity Index Values and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Curve Shape.颅脑创伤的自动调节管理:绝对压力反应性指数值和最佳脑灌注压曲线形状的作用。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Nov;40(21-22):2341-2352. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0017. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
6
Cerebrovascular reactivity (PRx) and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in elderly with traumatic brain injury.老年创伤性脑损伤患者的脑血管反应性(PRx)和最佳脑灌注压。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Feb 2;166(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-05956-9.
7
Cerebral pressure autoregulation and optimal cerebral perfusion pressure during neurocritical care of children with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患儿神经重症监护期间的脑压力自动调节与最佳脑灌注压
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023 Feb 17;31(5):503-513. doi: 10.3171/2023.1.PEDS22352. Print 2023 May 1.
8
The effects of cerebral pressure autoregulation status and CPP levels on cerebral metabolism in pediatric traumatic brain injury.小儿创伤性脑损伤中脑压力自动调节状态和脑灌注压水平对脑代谢的影响。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2024 Apr 24;166(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00701-024-06085-z.
9
Novel index for predicting mortality during the first 24 hours after traumatic brain injury.预测创伤性脑损伤后 24 小时内死亡率的新指标。
J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec 21;131(6):1887-1895. doi: 10.3171/2018.7.JNS18995. Print 2019 Dec 1.
10
Association of Outcomes with Model-Based Indices of Cerebral Autoregulation After Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.儿童创伤性脑损伤后基于模型的脑自动调节指数与结局的相关性。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Dec;35(3):640-650. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01279-0. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Temporal Resolution on Autocorrelative Features of Cerebral Physiology from Invasive and Non-Invasive Sensors in Acute Traumatic Neural Injury: Insights from the CAHR-TBI Cohort.时间分辨率对急性创伤性神经损伤中侵入性和非侵入性传感器检测的脑生理学自相关特征的影响:来自CAHR-TBI队列的见解
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;25(9):2762. doi: 10.3390/s25092762.
2
Study protocol: Cerebral autoregulation, brain perfusion, and neurocognitive outcomes after traumatic brain injury -CAPCOG-TBI.研究方案:创伤性脑损伤后的脑自动调节、脑灌注和神经认知结果-CAPCOG-TBI。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1465226. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1465226. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The lower limit of reactivity as a potential individualised cerebral perfusion pressure target in traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI high-resolution sub-study analysis.作为创伤性脑损伤潜在个体化脑灌注压目标的反应下限:CENTER-TBI 高分辨率亚研究分析。
Crit Care. 2023 May 20;27(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04485-8.
2
Autoregulatory Management in Traumatic Brain Injury: The Role of Absolute Pressure Reactivity Index Values and Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Curve Shape.颅脑创伤的自动调节管理:绝对压力反应性指数值和最佳脑灌注压曲线形状的作用。
J Neurotrauma. 2023 Nov;40(21-22):2341-2352. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0017. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Intracranial Pressure Thresholds for Cerebral Autoregulation Impairment: Age-Stratified Analysis of Ultra-Low-Frequency Pressure Reactivity Index (UL-PRx) in Traumatic Brain Injury.
脑自动调节功能受损的颅内压阈值:创伤性脑损伤中超低频压力反应性指数(UL-PRx)的年龄分层分析
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):152-163. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02056-5. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
Correction: Accuracy of Manual Intracranial Pressure Recording Compared to a Computerized High-Resolution System: A CENTER-TBI Analysis.
更正:与计算机化高分辨率系统相比手动颅内压记录的准确性:CENTER-TBI分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2023 Jun;38(3):833-834. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01722-4.
4
Evaluation and application of ultra-low-frequency pressure reactivity index in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients.超低频压力反应指数在小儿创伤性脑损伤患者中的评估与应用
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):865-874. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05538-1. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Cerebral Autoregulation Monitoring in Traumatic Brain Injury: An Overview of Recent Advances in Personalized Medicine.脑外伤患者的脑自动调节监测:个性化医学最新进展概述。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Nov;39(21-22):1477-1494. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0217. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
6
Evaluation and Application of Ultra-Low-Resolution Pressure Reactivity Index in Moderate or Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.超低压反应指数在中重度创伤性脑损伤中的评估与应用。
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2023 Jul 1;35(3):313-321. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000847. Epub 2022 May 3.
7
Addressing Key Clinical Care and Clinical Research Needs in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury: Perspectives From a Focused International Conference.应对小儿重度创伤性脑损伤的关键临床护理和临床研究需求:一场聚焦国际会议的观点
Front Pediatr. 2021 Jan 18;8:594425. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.594425. eCollection 2020.
8
Low-resolution pressure reactivity index and its derived optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in adult traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI study.成人创伤性脑损伤中的低分辨率压力反应指数及其衍生的最佳脑灌注压:CENTER-TBI 研究。
Crit Care. 2020 May 26;24(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02974-8.
9
Predictive and Discriminative Power of Pressure Reactivity Indices in Traumatic Brain Injury.压力反应指数在创伤性脑损伤中的预测和判别能力。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Sep 15;87(4):655-663. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa039.
10
Comparison of high versus low frequency cerebral physiology for cerebrovascular reactivity assessment in traumatic brain injury: a multi-center pilot study.对比高与低频率脑生理用于创伤性脑损伤脑血管反应性评估:一项多中心初步研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2020 Oct;34(5):971-994. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00392-y. Epub 2019 Oct 1.