Suppr超能文献

研究报告:常规饲养和通过动物福利认证的肉鸡养殖场肉鸡的福利和应激反应。

Research Note: Welfare and stress responses of broiler chickens raised in conventional and animal welfare-certified broiler farms.

机构信息

Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sanghuh College of Life Sciences, Konkuk University, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, South Korea.

K-AniWel, Gwonseon-gu, Suwon 16672, South Korea.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2024 Mar;103(3):103402. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.103402. Epub 2024 Jan 11.

Abstract

The present study was conducted to assess the animal welfare status of broiler chickens raised in conventional and welfare-certified farms. One conventional farm (30,000 birds/house, 1,488 m/house, 2 houses) and one animal welfare-certified farm (32,000 birds/house, 1,920 m/house, 2 houses) were selected to measure productivity, stress responses, and animal welfare indicators in 3 broiler flocks (2 farms/season, n = 6 flocks/farm type) during summer, autumn, and spring. Upon farm visits, body weight, uniformity, and animal welfare indicators (i.e., fecal and feather corticosterone, footpad dermatitis, hock burn, feather dirtiness, and gait score) were measured at 26 d posthatch. Also, moisture, nitrogen, and pH of litter, light intensity, ammonia concentration, and body surface temperature of head, chest, and legs were measured. There was no difference in body weight and uniformity between farm types. Fecal corticosterone concentrations were higher (P = 0.021) in welfare-certified vs. conventional farm, but no significant difference was found in feather corticosterone. Welfare-certified vs. conventional farm had lower percentages of hock burn (P = 0.018), feather dirtiness scores (P = 0.009), and gait score (P = 0.040), and there was no difference in footpad dermatitis. Nitrogen content in litter samples tended to be higher in conventional vs. welfare-certified farms (P = 0.094), and there was no difference in moisture and pH between farm types. Ammonia concentration within the broiler houses was not different between 2 farms. However, animal welfare farm was found to be brighter than conventional farm (P < 0.001). The body surface temperature of head, chest, and legs was not different between farm types. In conclusion, the welfare-certified farm had higher welfare measures, including lower hock burn, feather dirtiness, and gait score, confirming an overall improvement in welfare indicators. However, the observation on the elevated feather corticosterone noted in welfare vs. conventionally raised chickens warrants further studies.

摘要

本研究旨在评估常规和福利认证农场饲养的肉鸡的动物福利状况。选择了一个常规农场(每栋鸡舍 30000 只鸡,每栋鸡舍 1488 平方米,共 2 栋鸡舍)和一个福利认证农场(每栋鸡舍 32000 只鸡,每栋鸡舍 1920 平方米,共 2 栋鸡舍),在夏季、秋季和春季的 3 个肉鸡批次(每个农场/季节,n=6 个农场批次/农场类型)中测量生产力、应激反应和动物福利指标。在农场访问期间,在孵化后 26 天测量体重、均匀度和动物福利指标(即粪便和羽毛皮质酮、脚垫皮炎、跗关节烧伤、羽毛污垢和步态评分)。还测量了垫料的水分、氮和 pH 值、光照强度、氨浓度以及头部、胸部和腿部的体表温度。两种农场类型之间的体重和均匀度没有差异。福利认证农场的粪便皮质酮浓度较高(P=0.021),但羽毛皮质酮没有显著差异。与常规农场相比,福利认证农场的跗关节烧伤(P=0.018)、羽毛污垢评分(P=0.009)和步态评分(P=0.040)较低,脚垫皮炎无差异。常规农场的垫料样本中氮含量趋于高于福利认证农场(P=0.094),两种农场类型之间的水分和 pH 值没有差异。肉鸡舍内的氨浓度在两个农场之间没有差异。然而,福利农场比常规农场更亮(P<0.001)。头部、胸部和腿部的体表温度在两种农场类型之间没有差异。总之,福利认证农场的福利措施更高,包括跗关节烧伤、羽毛污垢和步态评分较低,证实了福利指标的整体改善。然而,在福利与常规饲养的鸡中观察到的羽毛皮质酮升高需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8acb/10835457/b2230b27fe21/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验