Nichols Emma, Petrosyan Sarah, Lee Jinkook
Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;79(4). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae028.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted daily life and led to sharp shocks in trends for various health outcomes. Although substantial evidence exists linking the pandemic and mental health outcomes and linking dementia and mental health outcomes, little evidence exists on how cognitive status may alter the impact of COVID-19 on mental health.
We used prepandemic data from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia study and 9 waves of data from the Real-Time Insights of COVID-19 in India study (N = 1 182). We estimated associations between measures of prepandemic cognition (continuous cognition based on 22 cognitive tests, dementia status) and mental health measures during the pandemic (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ]-4 [9 time points], PHQ-9 [2 time points], Beck Anxiety Inventory [3 time points]), adjusting for age, gender, rural/urban residence, state, education, and prepandemic mental health.
Summarizing across time points, PHQ-9 score was marginally or significantly associated with prepandemic cognition (PHQ-9 difference: -0.38 [-0.78 to 0.14] points per SD higher cognition; p = .06), and prepandemic dementia (PHQ-9 difference: 0.61 [0.11-1.13] points for those with dementia compared to no dementia; p = .02). Associations with BAI were null, whereas associations with PHQ-4 varied over time (p value for interaction = .02) and were strongest during the delta wave, when pandemic burden was highest.
We present initial evidence that mental health impacts of COVID-19 or other acute stressors may be unequally distributed across strata of cognitive outcomes. In dynamically changing environments, those with cognitive impairment or dementia may be more vulnerable to adverse mental health outcomes.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行扰乱了日常生活,并导致各种健康结果趋势的急剧冲击。尽管有大量证据表明大流行与心理健康结果以及痴呆症与心理健康结果之间存在关联,但关于认知状态如何改变COVID-19对心理健康的影响的证据却很少。
我们使用了来自印度纵向衰老研究-痴呆症诊断评估研究的疫情前数据以及来自印度COVID-19实时洞察研究的9波数据(N = 1182)。我们估计了疫情前认知指标(基于22项认知测试的连续认知、痴呆症状态)与大流行期间心理健康指标(患者健康问卷[PHQ]-4[9个时间点]、PHQ-9[2个时间点]、贝克焦虑量表[3个时间点])之间的关联,并对年龄、性别、农村/城市居住情况、州、教育程度和疫情前心理健康进行了调整。
汇总各时间点的数据,PHQ-9得分与疫情前认知呈微弱或显著关联(PHQ-9差异:每标准差更高认知水平下为-0.38[-0.78至0.14]分;p = 0.06),以及与疫情前痴呆症有关(PHQ-9差异:痴呆症患者与无痴呆症患者相比为0.61[0.11 - 1.13]分;p = 0.02)。与BAI的关联不显著,而与PHQ-4的关联随时间变化(交互作用p值 = 0.02),并且在德尔塔波期间最强,此时大流行负担最高。
我们提供了初步证据表明,COVID-19或其他急性应激源对心理健康的影响可能在认知结果的不同层次中分布不均。在动态变化的环境中,认知障碍或痴呆症患者可能更容易出现不良心理健康结果。