Pölzler Thomas, Tomabechi Tobu, Hannikainen Ivar R
Department of Philosophy, University of Graz, Attemsgasse 25/II, 8010 Graz, Austria.
Department of Social Psychology, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan.
Philos Stud. 2024;181(1):319-347. doi: 10.1007/s11098-023-02080-9. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
Some normative theorists appeal to the concept of basic needs. They argue that when it comes to issues such as global justice, intergenerational justice, human rights or sustainable development our first priority should be that everybody is able to meet these needs. But what are basic needs? We attempt to inform discussions about this question by gathering evidence of ordinary English speakers' intuitions on the concept of basic needs. First, we defend our empirical approach to analyzing this concept and identify a number of its potential features. Then we present three preregistered empirical studies that were conducted to investigate the extent to which ordinary speakers endorse these features. The studies yield convergent evidence for the following three claims: (1) ordinary speakers sometimes apply the concept of basic needs to necessities for a flourishing (not just a minimally decent) life, (2) most ordinary speakers attribute at least some degree of subjectivity to the concept, and (3) most ordinary speakers attribute at least some degree of relativity to the concept. We discuss the implications of these findings for philosophical analyses of .
一些规范理论家诉诸基本需求的概念。他们认为,在涉及全球正义、代际正义、人权或可持续发展等问题时,我们的首要任务应该是让每个人都能满足这些需求。但基本需求是什么呢?我们试图通过收集以英语为母语的普通人对基本需求概念的直觉证据,为有关这个问题的讨论提供参考。首先,我们为分析这一概念的实证方法进行辩护,并确定其一些潜在特征。然后,我们展示了三项预先注册的实证研究,这些研究旨在调查普通人认可这些特征的程度。这些研究为以下三项主张提供了趋同的证据:(1)普通人有时会将基本需求的概念应用于美好生活(而不仅仅是起码得体的生活)的必需品上;(2)大多数普通人认为这个概念至少有一定程度的主观性;(3)大多数普通人认为这个概念至少有一定程度的相对性。我们讨论了这些发现对……的哲学分析的影响。