Aoki Yoriko, Nakayama Kazuhiro, Yonekura Yuki
Department of Gerontological Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0272115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272115. eCollection 2024.
In Japanese medical practice, older stroke survivors are overwhelmed with information regarding their discharge locations, creating more decision-making challenges. A randomized controlled trial evaluated the influence of decision aids (DAs) for matching older stroke patients and their families' values concerning decisional conflict and participation in discharge destination decisions.
Participants were randomly allocated to intervention and control groups. The intervention spanned two months, from admission to discharge, at which times participants were surveyed. DAs were provided to the intervention group, and brochures to the control group. The primary endpoint was decisional conflict, assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS). The secondary endpoint decision-making participation was assessed using the Control Preference Scale (CPS) decision-making roles and a 10-point Visual Analog Scale for participation rate. An independent t-test analyzed decisional conflict scores and participation rates to examine between-group differences. The chi-square independence test evaluated roles in decision-making scores. Post hoc subgroup analyses were performed.
Ninety-nine participants (intervention group n = 51; control group n = 48) were included in the full analysis set, with a dropout rate of 38.4%. No significant group differences were found in decision-making conflict [t (99) = 0.69, p = 0.49, d = 0.14] and roles in decision-making scores [χ2 (5) = 3.65, p = 0.46]. However, a significant group difference was found in the participation rate [t (99) = 2.24, p = 0.03, d = 0.45]. DA tended to reduce uncertainty and promote participation rates, especially in participants living alone and unable to decide their discharge destination.
The use of DA with older stroke patients did not significantly decrease decisional conflicts. In addition, the participation rate in decision-making increased, but their active role did not. Further studies should be conducted to understand the methods of offering DA, their ideal durations, and identify their beneficiaries.
在日本的医疗实践中,老年中风幸存者面临着大量关于出院地点的信息,这带来了更多的决策挑战。一项随机对照试验评估了决策辅助工具(DAs)对老年中风患者及其家属在决策冲突和参与出院目的地决策方面价值观匹配的影响。
参与者被随机分配到干预组和对照组。干预为期两个月,从入院到出院,在此期间对参与者进行调查。向干预组提供决策辅助工具,向对照组提供宣传册。主要终点是决策冲突,使用决策冲突量表(DCS)进行评估。次要终点决策参与度使用控制偏好量表(CPS)决策角色和10分视觉模拟量表进行参与率评估。采用独立t检验分析决策冲突得分和参与率,以检验组间差异。卡方独立性检验评估决策得分中的角色。进行了事后亚组分析。
99名参与者(干预组n = 51;对照组n = 48)纳入全分析集,脱落率为38.4%。在决策冲突[t(99) = 0.69,p = 0.49,d = 0.14]和决策得分中的角色[χ2(5) = 3.65,p = 0.46]方面未发现显著的组间差异。然而,在参与率方面发现了显著的组间差异[t(99) = 2.24,p = 0.03,d = 0.45]。决策辅助工具倾向于减少不确定性并提高参与率,尤其是对于独居且无法决定出院目的地的参与者。
对老年中风患者使用决策辅助工具并未显著降低决策冲突。此外,决策参与率有所提高,但他们的积极作用并未增强。应进一步开展研究,以了解提供决策辅助工具的方法、其理想持续时间,并确定其受益者。