• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《控制偏好量表和信息需求问卷日语版的开发:决策制定和信息需求对日本乳腺癌患者的作用》

Development of Japanese Versions of the Control Preferences Scale and Information Needs Questionnaire: Role of Decision-Making and Information Needs for Japanese Breast Cancer Patients.

作者信息

Azuma Kanako, Kawaguchi Takashi, Yamaguchi Takuhiro, Motegi Sayuri, Yamada Kimito, Onda Kenji, Iwase Satoru, Unezaki Sakae, Takeuchi Hironori

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Practical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 May 18;15:1017-1026. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S295383. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/PPA.S295383
PMID:34040355
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8140924/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The importance of shared decision-making (SDM) between physicians and patients is increasingly recognized. In Japan, patients have shown more willingness to participate in treatment if medical professionals provide sufficient information; however, relationships between physicians and patients have traditionally been asymmetric, with patients accepting information from physicians without discussion. To explore the benefits of SDM in cancer treatment, including confidence in treatment decisions, satisfaction with treatment, and trust in healthcare providers, this study developed Japanese versions of the Control Preference Scale (CPS) and Information Needs Questionnaire (INQ).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Reliability and validity of the CPS and INQ were tested with 49 breast cancer patients.

RESULTS

The CPS showed good test-retest reliability (kappa coefficient: 0.61, weighted kappa coefficient: 0.61, Kendall's tau coefficient: 0.61) and acceptable criterion validity. The INQ showed adequate consistency; the mean number of circular triads and coefficient of consistency were 3 (range 0-19) and 0.9 (range 0.37-1), respectively. Using the CPS and INQ to identify patients' roles in decision-making and information needs, results further suggested that breast cancer patients in Japan want to participate in SDM. Medical issues, including disease spread and cure, were found to be of high interest, while social and psychological issues, including sexual attractiveness, genetic risk, and family impact, tended to be low.

CONCLUSION

The Japanese CPS and INQ can be used to assess patients' needs to improve care. Further, as patients' information needs change along the care trajectory, these tools should be used throughout treatment.

摘要

目的

医患之间共同决策(SDM)的重要性日益得到认可。在日本,如果医疗专业人员提供足够的信息,患者表现出更愿意参与治疗;然而,传统上医患关系是不对称的,患者在没有讨论的情况下接受医生提供的信息。为了探索共同决策在癌症治疗中的益处,包括对治疗决策的信心、对治疗的满意度以及对医疗服务提供者的信任,本研究开发了日语版的控制偏好量表(CPS)和信息需求问卷(INQ)。

患者与方法

对49名乳腺癌患者测试了CPS和INQ的信度和效度。

结果

CPS显示出良好的重测信度(kappa系数:0.61,加权kappa系数:0.61,肯德尔tau系数:0.61)和可接受的效标效度。INQ显示出足够的一致性;循环三元组的平均数和一致性系数分别为3(范围0 - 19)和0.9(范围0.37 - 1)。使用CPS和INQ来确定患者在决策中的角色和信息需求,结果进一步表明日本的乳腺癌患者希望参与共同决策。发现包括疾病扩散和治愈在内的医疗问题关注度较高,而包括性吸引力、遗传风险和家庭影响在内的社会和心理问题关注度往往较低。

结论

日语版的CPS和INQ可用于评估患者需求以改善护理。此外,由于患者的信息需求会随着护理轨迹而变化,这些工具应在整个治疗过程中使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443c/8140924/c219ed2647bd/PPA-15-1017-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443c/8140924/c219ed2647bd/PPA-15-1017-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443c/8140924/c219ed2647bd/PPA-15-1017-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of Japanese Versions of the Control Preferences Scale and Information Needs Questionnaire: Role of Decision-Making and Information Needs for Japanese Breast Cancer Patients.《控制偏好量表和信息需求问卷日语版的开发:决策制定和信息需求对日本乳腺癌患者的作用》
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 May 18;15:1017-1026. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S295383. eCollection 2021.
2
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
3
Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.共同决策、医生的解释与治疗满意度:一项针对前列腺癌患者的横断面调查。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01355-z.
4
Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.日本初级保健环境中医生和患者对共同决策的看法之间的关联:环境因素的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246518. eCollection 2021.
5
Is There a Relationship between Shared Decision Making and Breast Cancer Patients' Trust in Their Medical Oncologists?共享决策与乳腺癌患者对肿瘤医生信任之间是否存在关系?
Med Decis Making. 2020 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19889905. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
6
Shared Decision-Making in Patients With Prostate Cancer in Japan: Patient Preferences Versus Physician Perceptions.日本前列腺癌患者的共同决策:患者偏好与医生认知
J Glob Oncol. 2018 Sep;4:1-9. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.008045. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
7
Opportunities for addressing gaps in primary care shared decision-making with technology: a mixed-methods needs assessment.利用技术填补初级保健共同决策差距的机会:一项混合方法需求评估。
JAMIA Open. 2019 Jul 31;2(4):447-455. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz027. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese 9-Item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire and Its Association with Decision Conflict and Patient Factors in Japanese Primary Care.日本9项共同决策问卷的心理测量学评价及其与日本初级保健中决策冲突和患者因素的关联
JMA J. 2020 Jul 15;3(3):208-215. doi: 10.31662/jmaj.2019-0069. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
Consistency in paired comparisons of Information Needs Questionnaires (INQ) among Hong Kong Chinese breast cancer patients.香港中文乳腺癌患者信息需求问卷(INQ)配对比较的一致性。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Apr;17(2):170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared decision-making in patients with gynecological cancer and healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional observational study in Japan.妇科癌症患者与医疗保健专业人员之间的共同决策:日本的一项横断面观察研究。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 May;36(3):e47. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e47. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Translation and cultural adaption of the control preference scale across various care settings in a Danish hospital.跨越丹麦医院多个护理环境的控制偏好量表的翻译与文化调适。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 12;8(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00771-3.
3
Patient Preferences Influencing Treatment Decision-Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Germany, Italy, and Japan.

本文引用的文献

1
Information and participation preferences and needs of non-Western ethnic minority cancer patients and survivors: A systematic review of the literature.非西方少数民族癌症患者和幸存者的信息和参与偏好及需求:文献系统综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):631-650. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.11.018. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
2
Cancer information needs according to cancer type: A content analysis of data from Japan's largest cancer information website.根据癌症类型划分的癌症信息需求:对日本最大癌症信息网站数据的内容分析
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Oct 22;12:245-252. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.014. eCollection 2018 Dec.
3
Impact of oncology pharmacist-managed oral anticancer therapy in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia.
德国、意大利和日本早期乳腺癌患者偏好对治疗决策的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 25;18:1517-1530. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S450316. eCollection 2024.
4
Patient perspectives on treatment for mantle cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Japan.日本患者对套细胞淋巴瘤和慢性淋巴细胞白血病治疗的看法。
J Clin Exp Hematop. 2024 Jun 27;64(2):119-128. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.24016. Epub 2024 May 15.
5
A randomized controlled trial on the effects of decision aids for choosing discharge destinations of older stroke patients.一项关于决策辅助工具对老年中风患者出院目的地选择影响的随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0272115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272115. eCollection 2024.
6
Shared decision-making in physiotherapy: a cross-sectional study of patient involvement factors and issues in Japan.物理治疗中的共同决策:日本对患者参与因素和问题的横断面研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02208-1.
肿瘤药师管理的口服抗癌治疗对慢性粒细胞白血病患者的影响。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016 Dec;22(6):741-748. doi: 10.1177/1078155215608523. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
Preferences for pharmacist counselling in patients with breast cancer: a discrete choice experiment.乳腺癌患者对药剂师咨询服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Biol Pharm Bull. 2014;37(11):1795-802. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b14-00452. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
Shared decision-making for cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review.癌症护理中的少数民族群体共享决策:系统评价。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Dec;103(12):e15-29. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301631. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
6
Shared decision making among individuals with cancer in non-Western cultures: a literature review.非西方文化背景下癌症患者的共同决策:一项文献综述。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Sep;40(5):454-63. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.454-463.
7
Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Decisional Conflict Scale to investigate the value of pharmacists' information: a before and after study.用于调查药剂师信息价值的日语版决策冲突量表的开发与验证:一项前后对照研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 17;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-50.
8
Decision dissonance: evaluating an approach to measuring the quality of surgical decision making.决策失调:评估一种衡量外科手术决策质量的方法
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2013 Mar;39(3):136-44. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(13)39020-5.
9
Consistency in paired comparisons of Information Needs Questionnaires (INQ) among Hong Kong Chinese breast cancer patients.香港中文乳腺癌患者信息需求问卷(INQ)配对比较的一致性。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Apr;17(2):170-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 May 8.
10
Shared decision making in oncology practice: what do oncologists need to know?肿瘤学实践中的共同决策:肿瘤医生需要了解什么?
Oncologist. 2012;17(1):91-100. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0261. Epub 2012 Jan 10.