• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Arterial hypertension in the elderly. Double-blind study versus placebo of the efficacy and tolerability of an alpha-beta blocker: labetalol].

作者信息

Forette F, Henry-Amar M, d'Allens H, Hervy M P, Bouchacourt P, Henry J F, Pappo M

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1987 Feb;36(2):103-7.

PMID:3827157
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of labetalol, an alpha and beta-adrenergic receptor blocking agent in 32 patients aged from 72 to 97 years (mean = 85 years) with blood pressure (B.P.) greater than or equal to 160/95 mmHg. This study was carried out in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled design. After 6 weeks of treatment with labetalol (mean dose = 235 +/- 47.5 mg/day), the systolic pressure was lowered from 187 +/- 24 to 145 +/- 28 mmHg (p less than 0.001) and the diastolic pressure from 98 +/- 10 to 82 +/- 9 mmHg (p less than 0.001). Likewise, in the placebo group, both systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly reduced but the changes were significantly greater in the labetalol group, -33 +/- 26 versus -13 +/- 20 mmHg and -14 +/- 10 versus -8 +/- 14 mmHg respectively. Labetalol achieved B.P. control (160/95 mmHg) in 64% of the treated patients, compared to 40% in the placebo group. Two patients on labetalol discontinued their treatment due to side-effects (one bradycardia and one cutaneous reaction) compared with one patient on placebo (cardiac failure). Two other cases in the labetalol group had side-effects (one fatigue and one dizziness) which prevented increasing the treatment as necessary.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Arterial hypertension in the elderly. Double-blind study versus placebo of the efficacy and tolerability of an alpha-beta blocker: labetalol].
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1987 Feb;36(2):103-7.
2
The safety and efficacy of once-daily dilevalol in patients with mild hypertension: a placebo-controlled study.轻度高血压患者每日一次服用双醋洛尔的安全性和有效性:一项安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Hypertens. 1987 Sep;3(3):271-7.
3
Treatment of isolated systolic hypertension with labetalol in the elderly.
Arch Intern Med. 1990 May;150(5):974-6.
4
[Hypertension in the elderly. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of labetalol and nifedipine. A multicenter, randomized, single-blind study].[老年高血压。拉贝洛尔与硝苯地平疗效及耐受性比较。一项多中心、随机、单盲研究]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1990 May;39(5):305-9.
5
Efficacy and safety of sibutramine for weight loss in obese patients with hypertension well controlled by beta-adrenergic blocking agents: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial.西布曲明用于β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂良好控制血压的肥胖高血压患者减肥的疗效和安全性:一项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机试验
J Hum Hypertens. 2002 Jan;16(1):13-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001299.
6
Double-blind trial of labetalol.拉贝洛尔双盲试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1976 Aug;3(4 Suppl 3):737-41.
7
[Effect on lipids, lipoproteins and apoproteins of labetalol prescribed in doses of 400 mg/day in hypertensive patients. Double-blind versus placebo study].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1986 Apr;34(4):253-8.
8
[Treatment of arterial hypertension with labetalol. A polycentric study].[拉贝洛尔治疗动脉高血压。一项多中心研究]
G Ital Cardiol. 1982;12(10):729-35.
9
[Evaluation of labetalol in general medicine in aged patients with hypertension. Compliance, efficacy and safety in long-term treatment].[拉贝洛尔用于老年高血压患者普通内科治疗的评估。长期治疗中的依从性、疗效及安全性]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1990 Nov;39(9):547-53.
10
Propranolol-hydralazine combination in essential hypertension.普萘洛尔 - 肼屈嗪联合用药治疗原发性高血压
Clin Ther. 1983;5(5):525-39.

引用本文的文献

1
Labetalol. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.拉贝洛尔:对其药理学、药代动力学以及在高血压和缺血性心脏病治疗中的应用的重新评估。
Drugs. 1989 May;37(5):583-627. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198937050-00002.