Suppr超能文献

后房型可植入式角膜接触镜植入术中透明角膜切口与角膜缘隧道切口的角膜高阶像差及手术源性散光比较。

The comparison of corneal higher-order aberration and surgically induced astigmatism between the clear corneal incision and the limbus tunnel incision of posterior chamber implantable collamer lens implantation.

作者信息

Dan Ting-Ting, Liu Tai-Xiang, Luo Hong-Yang, Liao Yi-Lu, Li Zong-Ze

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University, Huichuan District, No. 149 Dalian Road, Zunyi, 563003, Guizhou Province, China.

Guizhou Eye Hospital, Zunyi, 563000, Guizhou Province, China.

出版信息

BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03311-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the corneal high-order aberrations and surgically induced astigmatism between the clear corneal incision and limbus tunnel incision for posterior chamber implantable collamer lens (ICL/TICL) implantation.

METHODS

A total of 127 eyes from 73 myopic patients underwent ICL V4c implantation, with 70 eyes receiving clear corneal incisions and 57 eyes receiving limbus tunnel incisions. The anterior and back corneal surfaces were measured and the Root Mean Square of all activated aberrations (TRMS) was calculated, including higher-order aberration (HOA RMS), spherical aberration Z, coma coefficients (Coma RMS) Z Z, and surgically induced astigmatism (SIA). The measurements were taken preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 day, 1 week, and 1, 3, and 6 months. In this study, the corneal higher-order aberration was estimated as the Zernike coefficient calculated up to 5th order. The measurements were taken at a maximum diameter of 6.5 mm using Pentacam.

RESULTS

One week after the operation, the corneal back Z of the clear corneal incision group was 0.06 ± 0.06, while the limbus tunnel incision group showed a measurement of 0.05 ± 0.06 (p = 0.031). The corneal back Z of the clear corneal incision group was -0.02 ± 0.25, compared to -0.04 ± 0.21 in the limbus tunnel incision group (p = 0.01). One month after the operation, the corneal back SIA of the clear corneal incision group was 0.11 ± 0.11, compared to 0.08 ± 0.11of the limbus tunnel incision group (p = 0.013), the corneal total SIA of the clear corneal incision group was 0.33 ± 0.30, compared to 0.15 ± 0.16 in the limbus tunnel incision group (p = 0.004); the clear corneal incision group exhibited higher levels of back astigmatism and total SIA than the limbus tunnel incision in the post-operation one month period. During the 6- month post-operative follow-up period, no significant difference in Z, Z, and other HOA RMS data was observed between the two groups. The total SIA of the corneal incision group and the limbus tunnel incision group were 0.24 ± 0.14 and 0.33 ± 0.32, respectively (p = 0.393), showing no significant difference between the two groups 6 months after the operation.

CONCLUSION

Our data showed no significant difference in the high-order aberration and SIA between clear corneal incision and limbus tunnel incision up to 6 months after ICL-V4c implantation.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较后房型可植入式接触镜(ICL/TICL)植入术中透明角膜切口和角膜缘隧道切口术后的角膜高阶像差和手术源性散光。

方法

73例近视患者的127只眼接受了ICL V4c植入术,其中70只眼采用透明角膜切口,57只眼采用角膜缘隧道切口。测量前后角膜表面,并计算所有激活像差的均方根(TRMS),包括高阶像差(HOA RMS)、球差Z、彗差系数(Coma RMS)Z Z和手术源性散光(SIA)。术前及术后1天、1周、1个月、3个月和6个月进行测量。在本研究中,角膜高阶像差通过计算至5阶的泽尼克系数来估计。使用Pentacam在最大直径6.5mm处进行测量。

结果

术后1周,透明角膜切口组角膜后表面Z值为0.06±0.06,而角膜缘隧道切口组为0.05±0.06(p = 0.031)。透明角膜切口组角膜后表面Z值为-0.02±0.25,角膜缘隧道切口组为-0.04±0.21(p = 0.01)。术后1个月,透明角膜切口组角膜后表面SIA为0.11±0.11,角膜缘隧道切口组为0.08±0.11(p = 0.013);透明角膜切口组角膜总SIA为0.33±0.30,角膜缘隧道切口组为0.15±0.16(p = 0.004);术后1个月内,透明角膜切口组的后表面散光和总SIA水平高于角膜缘隧道切口组。在术后6个月的随访期内,两组之间在Z、Z和其他HOA RMS数据方面未观察到显著差异。角膜切口组和角膜缘隧道切口组的总SIA分别为0.24±0.14和0.33±0.32(p = 0.393),术后6个月两组之间无显著差异。

结论

我们的数据表明,ICL-V4c植入术后6个月内,透明角膜切口和角膜缘隧道切口在高阶像差和SIA方面无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c9a/10809649/5a27bbb276d7/12886_2024_3311_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验