• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

调查乡村生活对压力、主观幸福感以及体重相关结果的影响。

Investigating the effects of rurality on stress, subjective well-being, and weight-related outcomes.

作者信息

Gold Joshua M, Drewnowski Adam, Andersen M Robyn, Rose Chelsea, Buszkiewicz James, Mou Jin, Ko Linda K

机构信息

Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Cancer Prevention, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA.

出版信息

Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023 Dec;5. doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2023.100171. Epub 2023 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.wss.2023.100171
PMID:38274306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10810484/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Rates of obesity are significantly higher for those living in a rural versus urban setting. High levels of stress and low levels of subjective well-being (SWB) have been linked to poor weight-related behaviors and outcomes, but it is unclear if these relationships differ as a function of rurality. This study investigated the extent to which living in a rural versus urban county ("rurality") moderated associations between stress / subjective wellbeing (predictors) and diet quality, dietary intake of added sugars, physical activity, and BMI (outcomes).

METHODS

Participants were recruited from urban ( = 355) and rural ( = 347) counties in Washington State and self-reported psychological, demographic, and food frequency questionnaires while physical activity behavior was measured objectively.

FINDINGS

After controlling for relevant covariates, levels of stress were positively associated with added sugar intake for those living in the urban county while this relationship was non-significant for those residing in the rural county. Similarly, SWB was negatively associated with added sugar intake, but only for urban residents. County of residence was also found to moderate the relationship between SWB and BMI. Higher SWB was inversely associated with BMI for those living in the urban county while no relationship was observed for rural county residents.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the hypothesis that the relationships between stress / SWB and weight function differentially based on the rurality of the residing county. This work adds to the growing body of literature highlighting the role stress and SWB play in the rural obesity disparity.

摘要

目的

生活在农村地区的人群肥胖率显著高于城市地区。高水平的压力和低水平的主观幸福感(SWB)与不良的体重相关行为及结果有关,但尚不清楚这些关系是否因农村地区的差异而有所不同。本研究调查了生活在农村与城市县(“农村地区”)对压力/主观幸福感(预测因素)与饮食质量、添加糖的饮食摄入量、身体活动和体重指数(结果)之间关联的调节程度。

方法

从华盛顿州的城市县(n = 355)和农村县(n = 347)招募参与者,他们自行报告心理、人口统计学和食物频率问卷,同时客观测量身体活动行为。

结果

在控制相关协变量后,城市县居民的压力水平与添加糖摄入量呈正相关,而农村县居民的这种关系不显著。同样,主观幸福感与添加糖摄入量呈负相关,但仅适用于城市居民。还发现居住县会调节主观幸福感与体重指数之间的关系。城市县居民中,较高的主观幸福感与体重指数呈负相关,而农村县居民未观察到这种关系。

结论

这些发现支持了这样的假设,即压力/主观幸福感与体重之间的关系因居住县的农村地区差异而有所不同。这项工作增加了越来越多的文献,强调了压力和主观幸福感在农村肥胖差异中所起的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/79c6042d0d62/nihms-1953308-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/165ab7a96dc8/nihms-1953308-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/efdbd8f9d324/nihms-1953308-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/79c6042d0d62/nihms-1953308-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/165ab7a96dc8/nihms-1953308-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/efdbd8f9d324/nihms-1953308-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/159c/10810484/79c6042d0d62/nihms-1953308-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating the effects of rurality on stress, subjective well-being, and weight-related outcomes.调查乡村生活对压力、主观幸福感以及体重相关结果的影响。
Wellbeing Space Soc. 2023 Dec;5. doi: 10.1016/j.wss.2023.100171. Epub 2023 Sep 3.
2
An Examination of Past and Current Influences of Rurality on Lesbians' Overweight/Obesity Risks.农村环境对女同性恋者超重/肥胖风险的过去和当前影响研究
LGBT Health. 2015 Jun;2(2):154-61. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2014.0112. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
3
Food Acquisition Practices, Body Mass Index, and Dietary Outcomes by Level of Rurality.食物获取行为、体质指数和不同农村水平的饮食结果。
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):228-239. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12536. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Health-Related Behaviors by Urban-Rural County Classification - United States, 2013.按城乡县分类划分的与健康相关行为 - 美国,2013年
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017 Feb 3;66(5):1-8. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6605a1.
5
Cancer-related Beliefs and Preventive Health Practices among Residents of Rural versus Urban Counties in Alabama.阿拉巴马州农村与城市县居民的癌症相关信念和预防保健实践。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 May;14(5):593-602. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0458. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
6
County-level colorectal cancer screening rates on colorectal cancer survival in the state of Georgia: Does county-level rurality matter?佐治亚州县级结直肠癌筛查率对结直肠癌生存率的影响:县级农村化程度是否重要?
Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(1):e6830. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6830. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
7
Associations Among Health Literacy, End-of-Life Care Expenditures, and Rurality.健康素养、临终关怀支出与农村地区的关联。
J Rural Health. 2021 Jun;37(3):517-525. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12513. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
8
Differences in Overweight/Obesity Among Youth in a Midwest State by Rural-Urban Continuum Codes.根据城乡连续体代码划分的中西部某州青少年超重/肥胖差异
S D Med. 2019 Sep;72(9):419-423.
9
Cancer disparities in the context of rurality: risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural classification codes.农村背景下的癌症差异:美国各种农村分类代码中的风险因素和筛查。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Aug;33(8):1095-1105. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01599-2. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
10
Assessment of Rural-Urban Differences in Health Care Use and Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementia.评估 Medicare 受益人群中阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆患者的城乡医疗保健使用和生存差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2022111. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.22111.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations of early life stress with leptin and ghrelin in healthy young adults.健康年轻成年人的早期生活应激与瘦素和胃饥饿素的关系。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2023 Mar;149:106007. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.106007. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
A cross-sectional analysis of physical activity and weight misreporting in diverse populations: The Seattle Obesity Study III.不同人群身体活动与体重误报的横断面分析:西雅图肥胖研究III
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Aug 21;6(6):615-627. doi: 10.1002/osp4.449. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
How is obesity associated with happiness? Evidence from China.
肥胖与幸福感有何关联?来自中国的证据。
J Health Psychol. 2022 Mar;27(3):568-580. doi: 10.1177/1359105320962268. Epub 2020 Oct 11.
4
Small increments in diet cost can improve compliance with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.饮食成本的少量增加可以提高对《美国人膳食指南》的遵从性。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Dec;266:113359. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113359. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
5
Lettuce be happy: A longitudinal UK study on the relationship between fruit and vegetable consumption and well-being.让我们快乐起来:一项关于水果和蔬菜消费与幸福感之间关系的英国纵向研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;222:335-345. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.017. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
6
Weight and social comparison: Does the weight of a stranger affect a person's perception of their own weight?体重与社会比较:陌生人的体重会影响一个人对自身体重的认知吗?
Health Psychol Open. 2018 Dec 21;5(2):2055102918819260. doi: 10.1177/2055102918819260. eCollection 2018 Jul-Dec.
7
Mediterranean diet and wellbeing: evidence from a nationwide survey.地中海饮食与健康:基于全国性调查的证据。
Psychol Health. 2019 Mar;34(3):321-335. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2018.1525492. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
8
Socioeconomic variables explain rural disparities in US mortality rates: Implications for rural health research and policy.社会经济变量解释了美国死亡率的农村差异:对农村健康研究和政策的启示。
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Aug 31;6:72-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.009. eCollection 2018 Dec.
9
Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015.评价 2015 年健康饮食指数。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1622-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.019.
10
Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015.更新后的健康饮食指数:HEI-2015。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Sep;118(9):1591-1602. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021.