Bagheri Reza, Karimi Zohreh, Mousavi Zeynabalsadat, Ziaee Bashirzad Mahdi, Camera Donny M, Sadeghi Ramin, Dabbagh Vahid Reza, Kargarfard Mehdi, Dutheil Frederic
Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan 8174673441, Iran.
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran 1477893855, Iran.
Nutrients. 2024 Jan 22;16(2):325. doi: 10.3390/nu16020325.
The effects of combining resistance training (RT) and concurrent training (CT; resistance + endurance training) with varied protein doses on bone measures remain poorly understood. Hence, we conducted a comparison of the impacts of two high-protein diets (1.6 or 3.2 g kg d) over 16 weeks in resistance-trained males, either with CT or RT alone.
A total of forty-eight males, all of whom were resistance-trained, had the following demographics: 26.6 ± 6 years, body mass index: 25.6 ± 2.9 kg m administered either 3.2 g kg d protein (CT2; = 12; RT2; = 12) or 1.6 g kg d protein (CT1; = 12; RT1; = 12) during 16 weeks (four sessions·w). Bone parameters were assessed pre- and post-intervention.
There was no significant interaction between the intervention group and time for the legs, arms, ribs, or pelvis area BMC and BMD ( > 0.05). For the BMD of the pelvis and the BMC of the right ribs, however, there were significant time effects noted ( < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between the intervention group and time in the lumbar and thoracic spines, with a particular time effect noted for the thoracic spine region ( < 0.05). The regional differences in skeletal responses to the intervention are highlighted by these data.
Our findings show that the intake of two high-protein diets combined with RT and CT during 16 weeks had no adverse effects on bone tissue parameters. While these findings indicate that protein intake between 2 and 3 times the current RDI does not promote bone demineralization when consumed in conjunction with exercise, future studies investigating the long-term effects of chronic high protein intake on bone tissue health are warranted.
抗阻训练(RT)与同时训练(CT;抗阻训练+耐力训练)结合不同蛋白质剂量对骨骼指标的影响仍知之甚少。因此,我们比较了两种高蛋白饮食(1.6克/千克/天或3.2克/千克/天)在16周内对仅进行抗阻训练或同时进行抗阻训练和耐力训练的男性的影响。
共有48名经过抗阻训练的男性,其人口统计学特征如下:年龄26.6±6岁,体重指数25.6±2.9千克/米²,在16周内(每周4次训练)接受3.2克/千克/天蛋白质摄入(CT2组;n = 12;RT2组;n = 12)或1.6克/千克/天蛋白质摄入(CT1组;n = 12;RT1组;n = 12)。在干预前后评估骨骼参数。
干预组与时间之间在腿部、手臂、肋骨或骨盆区域的骨矿含量(BMC)和骨密度(BMD)方面没有显著交互作用(P>0.05)。然而,对于骨盆的BMD和右侧肋骨的BMC,观察到显著的时间效应(P<0.05)。此外,干预组与时间在腰椎和胸椎存在显著交互作用,在胸椎区域观察到特定的时间效应(P<0.05)。这些数据突出了骨骼对干预反应的区域差异。
我们的研究结果表明,在16周内摄入两种高蛋白饮食并结合抗阻训练和同时训练对骨组织参数没有不良影响。虽然这些结果表明,当与运动结合时,蛋白质摄入量为当前推荐膳食摄入量(RDI)的2至3倍不会促进骨质流失,但有必要开展未来研究,调查长期高蛋白质摄入对骨组织健康的影响。