The Centre for Academic Child Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
J Affect Disord. 2024 Apr 15;351:158-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.198. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
Previous research has examined associations between parental religiosity and offspring mental health, but findings are inconsistent, and few studies have focused on late adolescence when mental health problems are more common. This study examines the prospective relationship between maternal religiosity and offspring mental health in late adolescence.
We used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children to examine the prospective association between latent classes of maternal religiosity (Highly Religious, Moderately Religious, Agnostic, Atheist) and self-reported mental health problems including common mental disorders, ICD 10 depression, depressive symptoms, generalised anxiety symptoms, self-harm acts, self-harm thoughts, and disordered eating outcomes at age 17-18 years (n = 7714). We used multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for maternal mental health, maternal adverse childhood experiences, and socioeconomic variables.
Compared with adolescent offspring of parents in the Agnostic class, offspring of the Atheist class had increased odds of depressive symptoms ((1.31[1.03,1.67]) and offspring of the Highly Religious class had increased odds of self-harm thoughts (1.43[1.04,1.97]). There was also weak evidence (95 % confidence intervals crossed the null) of increased odds of depression in the offspring of Moderately religious and Highly religious classes (1.26 [0.97,1.65], and 1.30 [0.99,1.70], respectively)) and self-harm acts in the offspring of the Highly religious class (1.31[0.98,1.74]). There was no evidence of associations with the disordered eating outcomes or generalised anxiety disorder symptoms.
We found evidence that adolescents whose mothers are Atheist, Moderately Religious, and Highly Religious are more likely to have depressive symptoms than those whose mothers are Agnostic. There was also evidence for an increased likelihood of self-harm (thoughts and acts) amongst adolescents of Highly Religious parents. Further research is needed to examine possible mechanisms that could explain these observed associations as well as a repetition of our analyses in a non-UK sample.
先前的研究已经考察了父母的宗教信仰与子女心理健康之间的关系,但研究结果并不一致,且很少有研究关注青少年后期,此时心理健康问题更为常见。本研究旨在探讨母亲宗教信仰的潜在类别与青少年后期子女心理健康之间的前瞻性关系。
我们使用了阿冯纵向研究父母和儿童的数据,来检验母亲宗教信仰的潜在类别(高度宗教、中度宗教、不可知论、无神论)与自我报告的心理健康问题(包括常见精神障碍、ICD-10 抑郁、抑郁症状、广泛性焦虑症状、自伤行为、自伤念头和饮食失调)之间的前瞻性关联,研究对象为 17-18 岁时(n=7714)的青少年。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析,对母亲的心理健康、母亲的不良童年经历和社会经济变量进行了调整。
与不可知论类父母的青少年子女相比,无神论类父母的青少年子女抑郁症状的几率更高(比值比 [OR]1.31[95%置信区间 1.03-1.67]),高度宗教类父母的青少年子女自伤念头的几率更高(OR1.43[95%置信区间 1.04-1.97])。中度宗教和高度宗教类父母的青少年子女患抑郁症的几率(OR1.26[95%置信区间 0.97-1.65]和 1.30[95%置信区间 0.99-1.70])和高度宗教类父母的青少年子女自伤行为的几率(OR1.31[95%置信区间 0.98-1.74])也有微弱的证据(95%置信区间与零相交)。但没有证据表明这些类别与饮食失调或广泛性焦虑症症状有关。
我们发现,母亲是无神论者、中度宗教和高度宗教的青少年比母亲是不可知论者的青少年更容易出现抑郁症状。高度宗教父母的青少年自伤(想法和行为)的可能性也有所增加。需要进一步的研究来检验可能的机制,以解释这些观察到的关联,以及在非英国样本中重复我们的分析。