Suppr超能文献

Double-blind comparison of the efficacy of extradural diamorphine, extradural phenoperidine and i.m. diamorphine following caesarean section.

作者信息

Macrae D J, Munishankrappa S, Burrow L M, Milne M K, Grant I S

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1987 Mar;59(3):354-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/59.3.354.

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy, duration of action and side effects of three analgesic regimens following Caesarean section is described. Patients received i.m. diamorphine 5 mg, extradural phenoperidine 2 mg or extradural diamorphine 5 mg. Analgesia was of rapid onset in all groups, as judged by reductions in linear analogue pain scores and rank pain scores. Time to next analgesia was significantly greater after extradural phenoperidine (5.96 h) and extradural diamorphine (8.39 h) than after i.m. diamorphine (3.40 h) (P less than 0.001). Itching was reported on direct questioning by 50% of patients in the extradural groups. No serious side effects were reported. Factors affecting the disposition of extradurally administered diamorphine are discussed.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验