Unit of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Elämänaukio 2, PL 272, 33521, Tampere, Finland.
Department of Surgery, Central Finland Central Hospital, Nova Hospital, Hoitajantie 3, 40620, Jyväskylä, Finland.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Jan 28;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00749-3.
Intramedullary tibial nailing (IMN) is the gold standard for stabilizing tibial shaft fractures. IMN can be performed through an infra- or suprapatellar approach.
The aim of this study is to compare the rate of fasciotomies for acute compartment syndrome between infra- and suprapatellar approaches.
A total of 614 consecutive patients who were treated with IMN for tibial fracture between October 2007 and February 2020 were included in the study. The approach used for IMN was determined by the operating surgeon. Infrapatellar IMN was performed with the knee in deep flexion position, with or without calcaneal traction. Suprapatellar IMN was performed in straight or semiflexed position. The diagnosis of compartment syndrome was based on clinical analysis, but for some patients, a continuous compartment pressure measurement was used. The primary outcome was the rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies.
The study sample included 513 patients treated with infrapatellar IMN and 101 patients treated with suprapatellar IMN technique. The mean age of the patients was 44.7 years (infrapatellar technique) and 48.4 years (suprapatellar technique). High energy trauma was seen in 138 (27%) patients treated with infrapatellar technique and in 39 (39%) patients treated with suprapatellar technique. In the suprapatellar group (n = 101), there were no cases of peri- or postoperative compartment syndrome treated with fasciotomies. In the infrapatellar group (n = 513), the need for fasciotomies was stated in 67 patients, 31 patients (6.0%) perioperatively and in 36 patients (7.0%) postoperatively. The rate of fasciotomies (0/101 versus 67/513 cases) differed significantly (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the fracture morphology or patient demographics between the study groups.
The suprapatellar technique is recommended over the infrapatellar approach in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures. The rate of peri- and postoperative compartment syndrome and the need for fasciotomies was significantly lower with the suprapatellar technique. The major cause of increased rate of peri- or postoperative acute compartment syndrome with infrapatellar IMN technique is presumably associated with the positioning of the patient during the operation.
髓内钉(IMN)是稳定胫骨骨干骨折的金标准。IMN 可通过髌下入路或髌上入路进行。
本研究旨在比较髌下入路和髌上入路治疗急性骨筋膜室综合征的筋膜切开率。
本研究纳入了 2007 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月期间接受 IMN 治疗的 614 例胫骨骨折患者。IMN 采用的入路由手术医生决定。髌下入路 IMN 在膝关节深度屈曲位进行,可合并跟骨牵引。髌上入路 IMN 在伸直或半屈位进行。骨筋膜室综合征的诊断基于临床分析,但对一些患者,使用连续筋膜室压力测量。主要结局为接受筋膜切开术治疗的围手术期骨筋膜室综合征发生率。
研究样本包括 513 例行髌下入路 IMN 治疗的患者和 101 例行髌上入路 IMN 治疗的患者。患者的平均年龄为 44.7 岁(髌下入路技术)和 48.4 岁(髌上入路技术)。高能量创伤见于 138 例(27%)行髌下入路技术治疗的患者和 39 例(39%)行髌上入路技术治疗的患者。在髌上组(n=101)中,无围手术期骨筋膜室综合征需行筋膜切开术的病例。在髌下入路组(n=513)中,67 例患者需行筋膜切开术,其中 31 例(6.0%)为围手术期,36 例(7.0%)为术后。筋膜切开术的发生率(0/101 例与 67/513 例)差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。两组间骨折形态或患者特征均无显著差异。
与髌下入路相比,髌上入路更推荐用于治疗胫骨骨干骨折。髌上入路技术治疗胫骨骨折时,围手术期和术后骨筋膜室综合征及筋膜切开术的发生率明显更低。髌下入路 IMN 技术中围手术期或术后急性骨筋膜室综合征发生率增加的主要原因可能与手术时患者的体位有关。