Suppr超能文献

经髌上入路髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗胫骨近关节外骨折:一项随机对照试验。

Intramedullary nailing via suprapatellar approach versus locked plating of proximal extra-articular tibial fractures: a randomized control trial.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Trauma, the First Hospital of Jilin University, No. 71 Xinmin Street, Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China.

Department of Cardiology and Echocardiography, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2021 Jun;45(6):1599-1608. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04821-5. Epub 2020 Sep 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Currently, nailing through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive plating have been generally accepted in the management of displaced proximal tibial fractures. This investigation was aimed at comparing these two treatment methods in terms of their effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

We randomized 328 patients into one of two groups: one underwent intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar approach (IMN group), while the other underwent locking compressive plate (LCP group) placement. The primary outcome was the Iowa Knee Score at 12 months. The clinical history, amount of intra-operative blood loss, rate of fracture healing, and post-operative complications were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at one, two, three, six and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Follow-up data for a year were available for 152 and 154 patients in the IMN group and LCP group, respectively. No intergroup difference was detected with regard to the Iowa Knee Scores (91 ± 8.2 in the IMN group and 90 ± 7.3 in the LCP group, respectively (p = 0.26)), at 12 months. Duration of operation (83.5 ± 35.3 min), amount of blood loss (55 ± 43 mL), duration of fluoroscopy (53.7 ± 3.9 s), and cases with difficult reduction (n = 46) in the IMN group did not differ significantly from those in the LCP group (80.1 ± 43.6 min; 65 ± 56 mL; 48 ± 12 s; 32) (p < 0.05). The two groups had similar post-operative complications and rate of fracture union, with the pre-injury activity level being restored in most patients. Removal of the implants was performed in 31.6% and 63.0% of the cases in the IMN and LCP groups, respectively, indicating a significant intergroup difference.

CONCLUSION

Both IMN through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive LCP were found to yield no significant intergroup difference of clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal, extra-articular tibial fractures. However, the requirement of implant removal was more relevant to LCP.

摘要

目的

目前,经髌上入路髓内钉固定和微创接骨板技术(LCP)已广泛应用于治疗胫骨近端移位骨折。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗方法的有效性和安全性。

方法

我们将 328 例患者随机分为两组:一组采用经髌上入路髓内钉固定(IMN 组),另一组采用锁定加压接骨板(LCP)固定。主要结局指标为 12 个月时的爱荷华膝关节评分(Iowa Knee Score)。次要结局指标包括临床病史、术中失血量、骨折愈合率和术后并发症。术后 1、2、3、6 和 12 个月对患者进行评估。

结果

152 例和 154 例患者分别在 IMN 组和 LCP 组完成了 1 年的随访。IMN 组和 LCP 组的爱荷华膝关节评分分别为 91±8.2 和 90±7.3(p=0.26),12 个月时无组间差异。IMN 组的手术时间(83.5±35.3min)、失血量(55±43mL)、透视时间(53.7±3.9s)和复位困难的病例(n=46)与 LCP 组无显著差异(80.1±43.6min;65±56mL;48±12s;32)(p<0.05)。两组术后并发症和骨折愈合率相似,大多数患者恢复了受伤前的活动水平。在 IMN 组和 LCP 组中,分别有 31.6%和 63.0%的病例需要取出内固定物,两组间存在显著差异。

结论

经髌上入路髓内钉固定和微创 LCP 治疗胫骨近端关节外骨折的临床疗效无显著组间差异。然而,内固定物的取出需求与 LCP 相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验