Suppr超能文献

在 18 世纪的伦敦,管理疯狂家族的遗产。

: managing family inheritance across madness in eighteenth-century London.

机构信息

University College London.

出版信息

Hist Psychiatry. 2024 Jun;35(2):234-242. doi: 10.1177/0957154X231222528. Epub 2024 Jan 28.

Abstract

An 'inquisition' (or inquiry) held before a Justice of the Peace was the primary instrument for management of lunacy in eighteenth-century England. Yet its purpose was to protect wealth rather than the individual. The 1766 case book of Dr John Monro, London's leading doctor for madness, unexpectedly records a consultation that links two siblings who both had inquisitions. Nicholas Jeffreys' only son was attested lunatic in 1744: to circumvent inheritance through primogeniture, Jeffreys directed the family wealth to his last living child. One of his three daughters married Lord Camden, a former Lord Chancellor: after her and her second sister's deaths, the last-surviving sister was also placed under inquisition in 1780, to ensure the inheritance for his own family.

摘要

在 18 世纪的英国,治安法官进行的“审讯”(或调查)是管理精神错乱的主要手段。然而,其目的是保护财富而非个人。伦敦治疗精神错乱的首席医生约翰·莫罗(John Monro)博士在 1766 年的病例手册中意外地记录了一次咨询,该咨询将两个都接受过审讯的兄弟姐妹联系在一起。尼古拉斯·杰弗里(Nicholas Jeffreys)唯一的儿子在 1744 年被证明是疯子:为了规避长子继承制的遗产继承,杰弗里将家族财富转移到他最后一个在世的孩子身上。他的三个女儿中有一个嫁给了前大法官卡姆登勋爵(Lord Camden):在她和第二个妹妹去世后,最后幸存的妹妹也在 1780 年接受了审讯,以确保为他自己的家庭继承遗产。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验