Suppr超能文献

从棉花、纸张和硬纸板表面擦拭和剪下DNA采集方法的比较。

Comparison of swabbing and cutting-out DNA collection methods from cotton, paper, and cardboard surfaces.

作者信息

Kuffel Agnieszka, Nic Daeid Niamh, Gray Alexander

机构信息

Leverhulme Research Centre for Forensic Science, Fleming Gym Building, University of Dundee, Small's Wynd, Dundee, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Jan 1;8:100453. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100453. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Choosing an inappropriate method of sample collection can often have a detrimental impact on DNA recovery. Multiple studies highlight the importance of selecting the recovery method based on the type of surface the DNA sample is located on. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of sample collection via the single cotton swabbing method in comparison to recovery directly from the material cut from the surface. The three types of surfaces included cotton, paper, and cardboard. DNA sources comprised cell-free and cellular DNA, as well as blood and saliva as examples of body fluids commonly encountered at crime scenes. The data analysis revealed that the cutting-out method resulted in higher DNA recovery from all but cardboard surfaces, making it the more efficient collection method. Despite its limitations, the cutting-out method should be considered as the DNA recovery method of choice when suitable.

摘要

选择不恰当的样本采集方法往往会对DNA提取产生不利影响。多项研究强调了根据DNA样本所在表面的类型选择提取方法的重要性。本研究旨在调查通过单根棉签擦拭法采集样本与直接从表面切割材料进行提取相比的效果。三种表面包括棉花、纸张和硬纸板。DNA来源包括无细胞和细胞DNA,以及血液和唾液,作为犯罪现场常见体液的示例。数据分析表明,除硬纸板表面外,切割法在所有表面上都能实现更高的DNA提取率,使其成为更有效的采集方法。尽管有其局限性,但在合适的情况下,切割法应被视为首选的DNA提取方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4923/10821607/a5657cf6d405/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验