Trpčić Marija, Perišić Marija Majda, Lukačević Fanika, Škec Stanko
Neo Dens, Fallerovo setaliste 2, 1000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb, Ivana Lučića 5, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2023 Dec;57(4):339-352. doi: 10.15644/asc57/4/5.
The study has evaluated the accuracy (trueness and precision) of seven extraoral scanners when scanning two different types of jaws: simplified jaw with sharp edges and abutments and realistic jaw with natural teeth. The accuracies of extraoral scanners were compared, and their compliance with the required clinical accuracy levels was discussed.
Ten scans were made with each scanner for both models. The comparison of the selected dental scanners relied on reference scans made for both models. Trueness, precision, and the distribution and value of laboratory scan points' deviations were assessed for each scanner across the models.
The trueness for the model of the simplified jaw with abutments ranged from 16.15 to 49.78 μm. The measured precision values for the same model ranged from 4.33 to 29.49 μm. For the model of the realistic jaw with natural teeth, the trueness results ranged from 11.32 to 24.55 μm, while the obtained precision values were between 2.29 and 18.06 μm.
The revealed dissimilarities in the accuracies of scanners and their ranking when scanning different models lead to the conclusion that model selection is critical for the research design. All the scanners met the clinical accuracy requirements and are suitable for use in laboratories for scanning jaws with abutments and jaws with natural teeth. However, the accuracy values reported by the manufacturers of scanners are better than those obtained in this study. Furthermore, the results suggested that blue light scanners outperform white light and laser scanners.
本研究评估了七种口外扫描仪在扫描两种不同类型颌骨时的准确性(真实性和精密度):带有尖锐边缘和基台的简化颌骨以及带有天然牙的逼真颌骨。比较了口外扫描仪的准确性,并讨论了它们是否符合所需的临床准确性水平。
对两种模型,每种扫描仪均进行十次扫描。所选牙科扫描仪的比较依赖于为两种模型制作的参考扫描。针对每个扫描仪,在各模型中评估真实性、精密度以及实验室扫描点偏差的分布和值。
带有基台的简化颌骨模型的真实性范围为16.15至49.78μm。同一模型的测量精密度值范围为4.33至29.49μm。对于带有天然牙的逼真颌骨模型,真实性结果范围为11.32至24.55μm,而获得的精密度值在2.29至18.06μm之间。
扫描仪在扫描不同模型时所显示出的准确性差异及其排名得出结论:模型选择对研究设计至关重要。所有扫描仪均符合临床准确性要求,适用于实验室扫描带有基台的颌骨和带有天然牙的颌骨。然而,扫描仪制造商报告的准确性值优于本研究中获得的值。此外,结果表明蓝光扫描仪优于白光和激光扫描仪。