UR-4660, C3S Laboratory Culture, Sport, Health and Society, UFR STAPS, University of Franche-Comté, 31, Chemin de l'Epitaphe, 2500, Besançon, France.
Institut Universitaire de France, IUF, Paris, France.
Psychol Res. 2024 Sep;88(6):1805-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01923-8. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
In a recent article entitled "Why motor imagery is not really motoric: towards a re-conceptualization in terms of effect-based action control", Bach et al. nicely renewed the concept of motor equivalence between actual movement and motor imagery (MI), i.e. the mental simulation of an action without its corresponding motor output. Their approach is largely based on behavioral studies and, to a lesser extent, on the literature using cerebral imagery. However, the literature on cortico-spinal circuitry modulation during MI can provide further, interesting aspects. Indeed, when it comes to addressing the motor system, one should consider the whole path from brain region to muscle contraction, including sub-cortical structures such as the spinal circuitry. This commentary aims at bridging this gap by providing supplemental evidence and outlining a complementary approach.
在最近题为《为什么运动想象不是真正的运动:从基于效果的动作控制的角度重新概念化》的文章中,Bach 等人很好地更新了实际运动和运动想象(MI)之间的运动等价性的概念,即没有相应的运动输出而对动作进行心理模拟。他们的方法主要基于行为研究,在较小程度上也基于使用大脑图像的文献。然而,关于 MI 期间皮质脊髓回路调制的文献可以提供更有趣的方面。实际上,当涉及到运动系统时,应该考虑从大脑区域到肌肉收缩的整个路径,包括脊髓电路等皮质下结构。本评论旨在通过提供补充证据和概述补充方法来弥合这一差距。