Suppr超能文献

夜间支具固定或运动疗法治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸中重度患者的随机临床试验

Nighttime Bracing or Exercise in Moderate-Grade Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2352492. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52492.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Moderate-grade adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) may be treated with full-time bracing. For patients who reject full-time bracing, the effects of alternative, conservative interventions are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether self-mediated physical activity combined with either nighttime bracing (NB) or scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE) is superior to a control of physical activity alone (PA) in preventing Cobb angle progression in moderate-grade AIS.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Conservative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (CONTRAIS) randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 10, 2013, through October 23, 2018, in 6 public hospitals across Sweden. Male and female children and adolescents aged 9 to 17 years with an AIS primary curve Cobb angle of 25° to 40°, apex T7 or caudal, and skeletal immaturity based on estimated remaining growth of at least 1 year were included in the study. Dates of analysis were from October 25, 2021, to January 28, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions included self-mediated physical activity in combination with either NB or SSE or PA (control). Patients with treatment failure were given the option to transition to a full-time brace until skeletal maturity.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was curve progression of 6° or less (treatment success) or curve progression of more than 6° (treatment failure) seen on 2 consecutive posteroanterior standing radiographs compared with the inclusion radiograph before skeletal maturity. A secondary outcome of curve progression was the number of patients undergoing surgery up until 2 years after the primary outcome.

RESULTS

The CONTRAIS study included 135 patients (45 in each of the 3 groups) with a mean (SD) age of 12.7 (1.4) years; 111 (82%) were female. Treatment success was seen in 34 of 45 patients (76%) in the NB group and in 24 of 45 patients (53%) in the PA group (odds ratio [OR], 2.7; 95% CI, 1.1-6.6). The number needed to treat to prevent curve progression with NB was 4.5 (95% CI, 2.4-33.5). Treatment success occurred in 26 of 45 patients (58%) in the SSE group (OR for SE vs PA, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-2.8). Up to 2 years after the primary outcome time point, 9 patients in each of the 3 groups underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, treatment with NB prevented curve progression of more than 6° to a significantly higher extent than did PA, while SSE did not; in addition, allowing transition to full-time bracing after treatment failure resulted in similar surgical frequencies independent of initial treatment. These results suggest that NB may be an effective alternative intervention in patients rejecting full-time bracing.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01761305.

摘要

重要性

对于中度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸 (AIS),可能需要全天支具治疗。对于拒绝全天支具治疗的患者,替代的保守干预措施的效果尚不清楚。

目的

确定自我介导的体育活动与夜间支具 (NB) 或脊柱侧弯特异性运动 (SSE) 相结合,与单纯的体育活动 (PA) 控制相比,是否更能预防中度 AIS 中 Cobb 角的进展。

设计、地点和参与者:青少年特发性脊柱侧凸保守治疗 (CONTRAIS) 随机临床试验于 2013 年 1 月 10 日至 2018 年 10 月 23 日在瑞典 6 家公立医院进行。纳入研究的患者为 9 至 17 岁的男性和女性儿童和青少年,其 AIS 主曲线 Cobb 角为 25°至 40°,顶点 T7 或尾部,根据估计至少有 1 年的剩余生长,骨骼未成熟。分析日期为 2021 年 10 月 25 日至 2023 年 1 月 28 日。

干预措施

干预措施包括自我介导的体育活动,与 NB 或 SSE 或 PA(对照)相结合。治疗失败的患者可以选择过渡到全天支具,直到骨骼成熟。

主要结果和测量指标

主要结果是与骨骼成熟前纳入的放射照片相比,连续 2 张后前位站立放射照片上看到的 6°或更小的曲线进展(治疗成功)或超过 6°的曲线进展(治疗失败)。曲线进展的次要结果是在主要结果后 2 年内进行手术的患者数量。

结果

CONTRAIS 研究纳入了 135 名患者(每组 45 名),平均年龄(SD)为 12.7(1.4)岁;111 名(82%)为女性。NB 组 45 名患者中有 34 名(76%)治疗成功,PA 组 45 名患者中有 24 名(53%)治疗成功(比值比 [OR],2.7;95% CI,1.1-6.6)。预防 NB 曲线进展所需的治疗人数为 4.5(95% CI,2.4-33.5)。SSE 组 45 名患者中有 26 名(58%)治疗成功(SE 与 PA 的 OR,1.2;95% CI,0.5-2.8)。在主要结果时间点后 2 年内,每组各有 9 名患者接受了手术。

结论和相关性

在这项随机临床试验中,与 PA 相比,NB 治疗显著更能预防超过 6°的曲线进展,而 SSE 则没有;此外,治疗失败后允许过渡到全天支具治疗会导致相似的手术频率,而与初始治疗无关。这些结果表明,NB 可能是拒绝全天支具治疗的患者的一种有效的替代干预措施。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01761305。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f3b/10825714/4315811c74b0/jamanetwopen-e2352492-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验