Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (E.L.F.).
Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, and Division of Nephrology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden (J.-J.C.).
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Mar;177(3):269-279. doi: 10.7326/M23-1138. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
The commonly accepted threshold of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) to define chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m. This threshold is based partly on associations between estimated GFR (eGFR) and the frequency of adverse outcomes. The association is weaker in older adults, which has created disagreement about the appropriateness of the threshold for these persons. In addition, the studies measuring these associations included relatively few outcomes and estimated GFR on the basis of creatinine level (eGFR), which may be less accurate in older adults.
To evaluate associations in older adults between eGFR versus eGFR based on creatinine and cystatin C levels (eGFR) and 8 outcomes.
Population-based cohort study.
Stockholm, Sweden, 2010 to 2019.
82 154 participants aged 65 years or older with outpatient creatinine and cystatin C testing.
Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT); incidence rate ratios for recurrent hospitalizations, infection, myocardial infarction or stroke, heart failure, and acute kidney injury.
The associations between eGFR and outcomes were monotonic, but most associations for eGFR were U-shaped. In addition, eGFR was more strongly associated with outcomes than eGFR. For example, the adjusted hazard ratios for 60 versus 80 mL/min/1.73 m for all-cause mortality were 1.2 (95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3) for eGFR and 1.0 (CI, 0.9 to 1.0) for eGFR, and for KFRT they were 2.6 (CI, 1.2 to 5.8) and 1.4 (CI, 0.7 to 2.8), respectively. Similar findings were observed in subgroups, including those with a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio below 30 mg/g.
No GFR measurements.
Compared with low eGFR in older patients, low eGFR was more strongly associated with adverse outcomes and the associations were more uniform.
Swedish Research Council, National Institutes of Health, and Dutch Kidney Foundation.
通常接受的肾小球滤过率 (GFR) 阈值用于定义慢性肾脏病 (CKD) 为小于 60 mL/min/1.73 m。该阈值部分基于估计肾小球滤过率 (eGFR) 与不良结局发生频率之间的关联。在老年人中,这种关联较弱,这引发了对该人群该阈值是否合适的争议。此外,测量这些关联的研究包括相对较少的结局和基于肌酐水平的估计肾小球滤过率 (eGFR),这在老年人中可能不太准确。
评估在老年人中,基于肌酐和胱抑素 C 水平的 eGFR 与 8 种结局之间的关联。
基于人群的队列研究。
瑞典斯德哥尔摩,2010 年至 2019 年。
82154 名年龄在 65 岁或以上、门诊有肌酐和胱抑素 C 检测的患者。
全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和接受替代治疗的肾衰竭 (KFRT)的风险比;再住院、感染、心肌梗死或中风、心力衰竭和急性肾损伤的发病率比。
eGFR 与结局之间的关联呈单调递增,但 eGFR 的大多数关联呈 U 形。此外,eGFR 与结局的关联比 eGFR 更紧密。例如,对于全因死亡率,60 与 80 mL/min/1.73 m 相比,eGFR 的调整后风险比为 1.2(95%CI,1.1 至 1.3),eGFR 的为 1.0(CI,0.9 至 1.0),对于 KFRT,它们分别为 2.6(CI,1.2 至 5.8)和 1.4(CI,0.7 至 2.8)。在包括尿白蛋白/肌酐比值低于 30 mg/g 的亚组中也观察到类似的发现。
没有 GFR 测量。
与老年患者的低 eGFR 相比,低 eGFR 与不良结局的关联更强,且关联更一致。
瑞典研究委员会、美国国立卫生研究院和荷兰肾脏基金会。