Fujii K, Fujiwara M, Kumada K, Kurahashi K, Usui H
Br J Pharmacol. 1987 Feb;90(2):355-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1987.tb08965.x.
We studied the regional differences both of reactivity to various stimulants and of neurogenic responses elicited by transmural stimulation in the longitudinal and circular muscles of the truncal portal vein, mesenteric vein, splenic vein and gastric vein of the dog portal tree. Strong spontaneous activity appeared in the longitudinal muscle of the truncal portal vein (96% of preparations tested). Weak spontaneous activity sometimes appeared in the circular muscle of the truncal portal vein (41%) and rarely in the longitudinal muscle of the mesenteric vein (12%). It did not appear in other segments. The splenic vein and the gastric vein showed similar patterns in the relationship between resting tension and response to noradrenaline; that is, the responsiveness of either longitudinal or circular muscle of these two veins increased and then decreased almost parallel as resting tension increased and reached a maximum under the same resting tension. The longitudinal muscle of both the truncal portal vein and the mesenteric vein was more responsive to noradrenaline, acetylcholine, histamine and KCl than the circular muscle; for example 2.02 and 1.44 times more responsive to noradrenaline, respectively. On the other hand, the longitudinal muscle of the splenic vein and the gastric vein responded less well than the circular muscle; for example 0.36 and 0.16 times as responsive to noradrenaline, respectively. Acetylcholine and histamine caused marked contractions which were comparable to those elicited by noradrenaline in the longitudinal muscle of the truncal portal vein. Acetylcholine also elicited similar contractions in the longitudinal muscle of the mesenteric vein but the responses induced in preparations of other segments were small. 6 The longitudinal muscle of the truncal portal vein responded well even to low-frequency stimulation of 2 Hz, while the circular muscles of the truncal portal and splenic veins gave marked responses only to high-frequency stimulation of 10 or 20 Hz or more. These contractile responses were attenuated by phentolamine (10-6 M) or atropine (10-6 M). The longitudinal muscle of the splenic vein showed no significant response to stimuli of any frequency. 7 It seems that the portal tree receives not only adrenergic but also cholinergic innervation. In addition, the longitudinal muscle of the truncal portal vein may receive non-adrenergic, noncholinergic innervation as well. 8 The longitudinal muscle of the portal vein may be crucial to venous return in assisting movement of the blood it contains. If this is the case in man, then the regional differences in the portal tree demonstrated in this study may explain why varicose changes during portal hypertension occur preferentially in the oesophagogastric region and rarely in other regions, as blood stasis may occur more readily in the regions of the gastric and splenic veins where the longitudinal muscle is not very active.
我们研究了犬门静脉树的主干门静脉、肠系膜静脉、脾静脉和胃静脉的纵行肌和环行肌对各种刺激的反应性以及经壁刺激引发的神经源性反应的区域差异。主干门静脉的纵行肌出现强烈的自发活动(96%的受试标本)。主干门静脉的环行肌有时出现微弱的自发活动(41%),肠系膜静脉的纵行肌很少出现(12%)。其他节段未出现自发活动。脾静脉和胃静脉在静息张力与去甲肾上腺素反应之间呈现相似模式;也就是说,这两条静脉的纵行肌或环行肌的反应性随着静息张力增加先升高后降低,几乎呈平行变化,并在相同静息张力下达到最大值。主干门静脉和肠系膜静脉的纵行肌对去甲肾上腺素、乙酰胆碱、组胺和氯化钾的反应比环行肌更敏感;例如,对去甲肾上腺素的反应性分别高2.02倍和1.44倍。另一方面,脾静脉和胃静脉的纵行肌反应不如环行肌;例如,对去甲肾上腺素的反应性分别为环行肌的0.36倍和0.16倍。乙酰胆碱和组胺引起明显收缩,与去甲肾上腺素在主干门静脉纵行肌引发的收缩相当。乙酰胆碱在肠系膜静脉纵行肌也引发类似收缩,但在其他节段标本中诱导的反应较小。主干门静脉的纵行肌即使对2Hz的低频刺激也反应良好,而主干门静脉和脾静脉的环行肌仅对10Hz或20Hz及以上的高频刺激有明显反应。这些收缩反应被酚妥拉明(10⁻⁶M)或阿托品(10⁻⁶M)减弱。脾静脉的纵行肌对任何频率的刺激均无明显反应。似乎门静脉树不仅接受肾上腺素能神经支配,还接受胆碱能神经支配。此外,主干门静脉的纵行肌可能还接受非肾上腺素能、非胆碱能神经支配。门静脉的纵行肌在协助其所含血液流动以促进静脉回流方面可能至关重要。如果人类也是如此,那么本研究中显示的门静脉树区域差异可能解释了为什么门静脉高压期间静脉曲张变化优先发生在食管胃区域,而很少发生在其他区域,因为在胃静脉和脾静脉区域,纵行肌不太活跃,可能更容易发生血液淤滞。