• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用医疗保健系统数据评估临床试验结局:设计阶段需考虑的问题。

Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage.

机构信息

MRC-NIHR Trials Methodology Research Partnership, Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 Jan 29;25(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z
PMID:38287428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10823676/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Healthcare system data (HSD) are increasingly used in clinical trials, augmenting or replacing traditional methods of collecting outcome data. This study, PRIMORANT, set out to identify, in the UK context, issues to be considered before the decision to use HSD for outcome data in a clinical trial is finalised, a methodological question prioritised by the clinical trials community.

METHODS

The PRIMORANT study had three phases. First, an initial workshop was held to scope the issues faced by trialists when considering whether to use HSDs for trial outcomes. Second, a consultation exercise was undertaken with clinical trials unit (CTU) staff, trialists, methodologists, clinicians, funding panels and data providers. Third, a final discussion workshop was held, at which the results of the consultation were fed back, case studies presented, and issues considered in small breakout groups.

RESULTS

Key topics included in the consultation process were the validity of outcome data, timeliness of data capture, internal pilots, data-sharing, practical issues, and decision-making. A majority of consultation respondents (n = 78, 95%) considered the development of guidance for trialists to be feasible. Guidance was developed following the discussion workshop, for the five broad areas of terminology, feasibility, internal pilots, onward data sharing, and data archiving.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide guidance to inform decisions about whether or not to use HSDs for outcomes, and if so, to assist trialists in working with registries and other HSD providers to improve the design and delivery of trials.

摘要

背景

医疗保健系统数据(HSD)越来越多地用于临床试验,补充或替代传统的收集结果数据的方法。本研究 PRIMORANT,旨在确定在英国背景下,在最终决定将 HSD 用于临床试验的结果数据之前需要考虑的问题,这是临床试验界优先考虑的方法学问题。

方法

PRIMORANT 研究分为三个阶段。首先,举行了一次初始研讨会,以确定试验人员在考虑是否将 HSD 用于试验结果时面临的问题。其次,与临床试验单位(CTU)工作人员、试验人员、方法学家、临床医生、资助小组和数据提供者进行了磋商。第三,举行了一次最终讨论研讨会,会上反馈了磋商的结果,介绍了案例研究,并在小组讨论中讨论了小组成员考虑的问题。

结果

磋商过程中涉及的关键主题包括结果数据的有效性、数据采集的及时性、内部试点、数据共享、实际问题和决策。大多数磋商受访者(n=78,95%)认为为试验人员制定指南是可行的。在讨论研讨会之后,为五个广泛领域制定了指南,包括术语、可行性、内部试点、后续数据共享和数据存档。

结论

我们提供了指导,以帮助决策者决定是否使用 HSD 来获取结果,以及如果使用,协助试验人员与登记处和其他 HSD 提供者合作,以改进试验的设计和实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6c/10823676/5512c5bdb3b5/13063_2024_7926_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6c/10823676/5512c5bdb3b5/13063_2024_7926_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd6c/10823676/5512c5bdb3b5/13063_2024_7926_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Using healthcare systems data for outcomes in clinical trials: issues to consider at the design stage.利用医疗保健系统数据评估临床试验结局:设计阶段需考虑的问题。
Trials. 2024 Jan 29;25(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-07926-z.
2
Pilot Medical Certification飞行员医学认证
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Time to STEP UP: methods and findings from the development of guidance to help researchers design inclusive clinical trials.加快步伐:制定指导方针以帮助研究人员设计包容性临床试验的方法和研究结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 2;24(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02342-y.
6
The use of healthcare systems data for RCTs.利用医疗保健系统数据进行 RCT 研究。
Trials. 2024 Jan 29;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07846-4.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
9
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
10
Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey.临床试验数据共享的预测因素:横断面调查的探索性分析
Trials. 2014 Oct 2;15:384. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-384.

引用本文的文献

1
Agreement and utility of coded primary and secondary care data for long-term follow-up of clinical trial outcomes.用于临床试验结果长期随访的编码初级和二级护理数据的一致性与实用性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02606-1.
2
Utilising primary care electronic health records to deliver the ALABAMA randomised controlled trial of penicillin allergy assessment.利用初级保健电子健康记录来提供 PENICILLIN ALLERGY ASSESSMENT(青霉素过敏评估)的 ALABAMA 随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Oct 3;25(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08506-x.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of healthcare systems data for RCTs.利用医疗保健系统数据进行 RCT 研究。
Trials. 2024 Jan 29;25(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07846-4.
2
A DELPHI study priority setting the remaining challenges for the use of routinely collected data in trials: COMORANT-UK.德尔福研究优先考虑了在试验中使用常规收集数据的剩余挑战:COMORANT-UK。
Trials. 2023 Mar 30;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07251-x.
3
Data provenance and integrity of health-care systems data for clinical trials.临床试验医疗保健系统数据的数据来源与完整性。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Aug;4(8):e567-e568. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00122-4.
4
A study protocol for the development of a SPIRIT extension for trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (SPIRIT-ROUTINE).一项关于开发用于使用队列和常规收集数据进行试验的SPIRIT扩展版(SPIRIT-ROUTINE)的研究方案。
HRB Open Res. 2021 Jul 29;4:82. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13314.1. eCollection 2021.
5
Realising the full potential of data-enabled trials in the UK: a call for action.挖掘英国数据驱动型试验的全部潜力:行动呼吁。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 16;11(6):e043906. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043906.
6
CONSORT extension for the reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using cohorts and routinely collected data (CONSORT-ROUTINE): checklist with explanation and elaboration.CONSORT 扩展报告用于使用队列和常规收集数据进行的随机对照试验 (CONSORT-ROUTINE):清单和解释。
BMJ. 2021 Apr 29;373:n857. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n857.
7
Use of routinely collected data in a UK cohort of publicly funded randomised clinical trials.在英国一个由公共资金资助的随机临床试验队列中使用常规收集的数据。
F1000Res. 2020 May 4;9:323. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23316.3. eCollection 2020.
8
Access to routinely collected health data for clinical trials - review of successful data requests to UK registries.获取常规收集的临床试验健康数据 - 对英国注册机构成功的数据请求进行审查。
Trials. 2020 May 12;21(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04329-8.
9
The trials of being a national trauma registry.成为国家创伤登记处的考验。
Emerg Med J. 2015 Dec;32(12):909-10. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205424.