• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大剂量脉冲甲泼尼龙与地塞米松标准疗法治疗重症和危重症 COVID-19 肺炎:来自马来西亚单中心回顾性经验的疗效评估。

High-dose pulse methylprednisolone vs. dexamethasone standard therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia: Efficacy assessment in a retrospective single-centre experience from Malaysia.

机构信息

University Malaya Medical Center, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

University Malaya Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2024 Jan;79(1):15-20.

PMID:38287752
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of dexamethasone (DXM) has been associated with decreased mortality in the patients with hypoxemia during the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, while the outcomes with methylprednisolone (MTP) have been mixed. This real-life study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19 who were treated with high doses of MTP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled hospitalised patients between May 2021 and August 2021, aged 18 years and above, with severe respiratory failure defined by a ratio of oxygen saturation to fraction of inspired oxygen (SF ratio) of less than 235. The treatment protocol involved administering high-dose MTP for 3 days, followed by DXM, and the outcomes were compared with those of patients who received DXM alone (total treatment duration of 10 days for both groups).

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients were enrolled, with 79 (79.8%) receiving pulse MTP therapy and 20 (20.2%) being treated with DXM only. The SF ratio significantly improved from a mean of 144.49 (±45.16) at baseline to 208 (±85.19) at 72 hours (p < 0.05), with a mean difference of 63.51 (p < 0.001) in patients who received ≤750 mg of MTP. Additionally, in patients who received >750 mg of MTP, the SF ratio improved from a baseline mean of 130.39 (±34.53) to 208.44 (±86.61) at 72 hours (p < 0.05), with a mean difference of 78.05 (p = 0.001). In contrast, patients who received DXM only demonstrated an SF ratio of 132.85 (±44.1) at baseline, which changed minimally to 133.35 (±44.4) at 72 hours (p = 0.33), with a mean difference of 0.50 (p = 0.972). The incidence of nosocomial infection was higher in the MTP group compared with the DXM group (40.5% vs. 35%, p = 0.653), with a relative risk of 1.16 (95% CI: 0.60-2.23).

CONCLUSION

MTP did not demonstrate a significant reduction in intubation or intensive care unit admissions. Although a high dose of MTP improved gas exchange in patients with severe and critical COVID-19, it did not provide an overall mortality benefit compared to standard treatment.

摘要

介绍

在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,使用地塞米松(DXM)与低氧血症患者的死亡率降低有关,而甲泼尼龙(MTP)的结果则喜忧参半。本真实世界研究旨在评估因 COVID-19 导致严重呼吸衰竭并接受高剂量 MTP 治疗的患者的结局。

材料和方法

本回顾性队列研究纳入了 2021 年 5 月至 2021 年 8 月期间住院的年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者,严重呼吸衰竭的定义为氧饱和度与吸入氧分数(SF 比)比值低于 235。治疗方案包括 3 天的高剂量 MTP 治疗,然后是 DXM,将其与仅接受 DXM 的患者的结局进行比较(两组的总治疗时间均为 10 天)。

结果

共纳入 99 例患者,其中 79 例(79.8%)接受脉冲 MTP 治疗,20 例(20.2%)仅接受 DXM 治疗。SF 比值从基线时的 144.49(±45.16)显著改善至 72 小时时的 208(±85.19)(p<0.05),接受≤750mg MTP 的患者平均差异为 63.51(p<0.001)。此外,接受>750mg MTP 的患者 SF 比值从基线时的 130.39(±34.53)改善至 72 小时时的 208.44(±86.61)(p<0.05),平均差异为 78.05(p=0.001)。相比之下,仅接受 DXM 的患者基线时的 SF 比值为 132.85(±44.1),72 小时时变化极小,为 133.35(±44.4)(p=0.33),平均差异为 0.50(p=0.972)。MTP 组的院内感染发生率高于 DXM 组(40.5% vs. 35%,p=0.653),相对风险为 1.16(95%CI:0.60-2.23)。

结论

MTP 并未显著降低插管或入住重症监护病房的几率。尽管高剂量 MTP 改善了严重和危重症 COVID-19 患者的气体交换,但与标准治疗相比,并未带来整体死亡率的获益。

相似文献

1
High-dose pulse methylprednisolone vs. dexamethasone standard therapy for severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia: Efficacy assessment in a retrospective single-centre experience from Malaysia.大剂量脉冲甲泼尼龙与地塞米松标准疗法治疗重症和危重症 COVID-19 肺炎:来自马来西亚单中心回顾性经验的疗效评估。
Med J Malaysia. 2024 Jan;79(1):15-20.
2
Dexamethasone vs methylprednisolone high dose for Covid-19 pneumonia.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙大剂量治疗新冠肺炎肺炎。
PLoS One. 2021 May 25;16(5):e0252057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252057. eCollection 2021.
3
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib to prevent respiratory insufficiency progression in onco-hematological patients affected with COVID19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估巴瑞替尼预防 COVID19 相关血液肿瘤患者呼吸功能不全进展的疗效的 I/II 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05072-4.
4
Dexamethasone versus weight-adjusted methylprednisolone in patients with moderate-severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.地塞米松与调整体重后的甲基泼尼松龙治疗中重度 SARS-CoV-2 肺炎患者的比较。
Med Clin (Barc). 2023 Feb 24;160(4):156-159. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2022.06.015. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
Effect of pulse methylprednisolone on prognosis in SARS-CoV-2 patients with severe pneumonia.脉冲甲基泼尼松龙对重症 COVID-19 肺炎患者预后的影响。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024 Feb;28(3):1234-1240. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202402_35362.
6
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
7
Comparison of methylprednisolone pulse vs conventional dexamethasone for adult cases of COVID-19 requiring oxygen; a Japanese retrospective cohort study.比较甲泼尼龙脉冲与常规地塞米松治疗需要吸氧的成人 COVID-19 病例:一项日本回顾性队列研究。
J Infect Chemother. 2023 Mar;29(3):269-273. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2022.11.008. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
8
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
9
High-Dose Dexamethasone and Oxygen Support Strategies in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Severe COVID-19 Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The COVIDICUS Randomized Clinical Trial.重症 COVID-19 急性低氧性呼吸衰竭患者的 ICU 中高剂量地塞米松和氧支持策略:COVIDICUS 随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):906-916. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2168.
10
A Comparison of the Effects of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone, Used on Level-3 Intensive Care COVID-19 Patients, on Mortality: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study.地塞米松与甲泼尼龙治疗 3 级重症 COVID-19 患者对死亡率影响的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jul 24;38(29):e232. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e232.

引用本文的文献

1
The comparative effectiveness of methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone on in-hospital mortality in patients with severe or critical COVID-19: a retrospective observational study.甲泼尼龙与地塞米松对重症或危重症新型冠状病毒肺炎患者院内死亡率的比较疗效:一项回顾性观察研究
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2025 Apr 22;12:20499361251328824. doi: 10.1177/20499361251328824. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Association of cumulative methylprednisolone dosages with mortality risk from pneumonia in connective tissue disease patients.结缔组织病患者累积甲泼尼龙剂量与肺炎死亡率的关系。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 3;14(1):26502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-78233-5.
3
The glucocorticoid dose-mortality nexus in pneumonia patients: unveiling the threshold effect.
肺炎患者中糖皮质激素剂量与死亡率的关系:揭示阈值效应。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 19;15:1445979. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1445979. eCollection 2024.