Huarote Fernández Joaquín Enrique, Lugo Varillas Jocelyn Graciela
Carrera de Estomatología, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú.
Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Estomatología, Universidad Científica del Sur. Lima, Perú.
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2023 Mar 26;11(1):e142. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1101-2023-142. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
Photodynamic therapy consists of the application of a light with an adequate wavelength on the cavities prior to the application of a photosensitizing agent, with the purpose of eliminating remnants of microorganisms remaining after instrumentation.
Evaluate the adhesive resistance to dentin treated with 2% chlorhexidine and photodynamic therapy with a 660nm diode prior to the insertion of composite resin.
In this in vitro experimental study, 60 bovine mandibular incisors were collected, After dentin wear, the samples were divided into 3 groups, with 20 samples per group: control group (no therapy was applied), 2% chlorhexidine, and 660nm diode laser (photosensitizer: methylene blue). Adhesive strength test was measured by shear test compared to kruskall-wallis test and post-hoc pairwise comparison.
The average values from highest to lowest result with the CHX (14.82 ± 3.14), followed by the 660nm diode laser (14.77 ± 4.02) and the control group (9.25 ± 1.16). Similar groups of 660 nm diode laser and 2% CHX changed values (P>0.05), but significantly higher than the control group (P<0.001). Photodynamic therapy increased adhesive resistance as well as chlorhexidine, both therapies presented an increase in adhesive resistance compared to the control group.
光动力疗法包括在应用光敏剂之前,将具有适当波长的光照射到牙腔上,目的是消除器械操作后残留的微生物。
在复合树脂充填前,评估2%氯己定和660nm二极管光动力疗法处理牙本质后的粘结抗力。
在这项体外实验研究中,收集60颗牛下颌切牙,牙本质磨损后,将样本分为3组,每组20个样本:对照组(未进行治疗)、2%氯己定组和660nm二极管激光组(光敏剂:亚甲蓝)。通过剪切试验测量粘结强度,并与克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和事后两两比较进行对比。
从最高到最低结果的平均值依次为:2%氯己定组(14.82±3.14),其次是660nm二极管激光组(14.77±4.02)和对照组(9.25±1.16)。660nm二极管激光组和2%氯己定组的数值相似(P>0.05),但显著高于对照组(P<0.001)。光动力疗法与氯己定一样增加了粘结抗力,与对照组相比,两种疗法的粘结抗力均有所增加。