甲氨蝶呤单药疗法与甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特治疗银屑病关节炎的比较(COMPLETE-PsA):一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验。

Comparing methotrexate monotherapy with methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy in psoriatic arthritis (COMPLETE-PsA): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, trial.

作者信息

Mulder Michelle L M, Vriezekolk Johanna E, van Hal Tamara W, Nieboer Lieke M, den Broeder Nathan, de Jong Elke M G J, den Broeder Alfons A, van den Hoogen Frank H J, Helliwell Philip S, Wenink Mark H

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands; Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;4(4):e252-e261. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00028-5. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the preferred first-line treatment in patients with psoriatic arthritis, although there is a paucity of evidence for the efficacy of conventional synthetic DMARDs and especially their combination. We aimed to investigate whether a combination of methotrexate plus leflunomide is superior to methotrexate monotherapy at improving disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

METHODS

This single centre, investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at Sint Maartenskliniek in the Netherlands (locations included Boxmeer, Geldrop, Woerden, and Nijmegen). Patients aged 16 years or older with a clinical diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis and active disease (defined as two or more swollen joints; dactylitis counting as one swollen joint) were included. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) and stratified by high disease activity (psoriatic arthritis disease activity score [PASDAS] ≥5·4) to either methotrexate plus leflunomide (combination therapy) or methotrexate plus placebo (monotherapy), using computer-generated stratified variable block randomisation. In both groups, patients received oral methotrexate 15 mg per week for the first 4 weeks and 25 mg per week thereafter combined with two leflunomide 10 mg tablets once per day or two placebo tablets. During the study period, the patients, nurses, researchers, and treating physicians were all masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the difference in mean PASDAS at week 16, adjusted for baseline PASDAS, between the combination and monotherapy groups, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial was registered with the Netherlands Trial Register (NL7404) on Dec 3, 2018.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 19, 2019, and March 11, 2021, 82 patients were screened for eligibility. Four patients were ineligible and 78 were enrolled and randomly assigned to either methotrexate plus leflunomide (n=39) or methotrexate plus placebo (n=39). 50 (64%) of 78 patients were male, 28 (36%) were female, and the median age of patients was 55·0 years (IQR 42·0-64·0). Methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy was superior to methotrexate monotherapy at week 16 (PASDAS 3·1 [SD 1·4] vs 3·7 [SD 1·3]; treatment difference -0·6, 90% CI -1·0 to -0·1; p=0·025). There were no study deaths. The most frequently occurring adverse events were nausea or vomiting (17 [44%] of 39 patients in the methotrexate plus leflunomide group vs 11 [28%] of 39 in the methotrexate plus placebo group), tiredness (9 [23%] vs 13 [33%]) and elevated alanine aminotransferase (12 [31%] vs 7 [18%]. Generally, the incidence of mostly mild adverse events was higher in the methotrexate plus leflunomide group than in the methotrexate plus placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy results in greater improvement in disease activity according to PASDAS in patients with psoriatic arthritis. However, methotrexate plus leflunomide combination therapy is less well tolerated than methotrexate monotherapy.

FUNDING

Regional Junior Researcher Grant from the Sint Maartenskliniek.

摘要

背景

传统合成改善病情抗风湿药(DMARDs)是银屑病关节炎患者首选的一线治疗药物,尽管传统合成DMARDs的疗效,尤其是其联合用药的疗效证据不足。我们旨在研究甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特在改善银屑病关节炎患者疾病活动度方面是否优于甲氨蝶呤单药治疗。

方法

本单中心、研究者发起的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验在荷兰的圣马丁诊所(地点包括博克斯梅尔、海尔德洛普、福尔登和奈梅亨)进行。纳入年龄在16岁及以上、临床诊断为银屑病关节炎且疾病活动(定义为两个或更多关节肿胀;指(趾)炎计为一个肿胀关节)的患者。患者采用计算机生成的分层变量区组随机化方法,按高疾病活动度(银屑病关节炎疾病活动评分[PASDAS]≥5.4)进行随机分组(1:1),分为甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特(联合治疗组)或甲氨蝶呤联合安慰剂(单药治疗组)。两组患者均在最初4周每周口服甲氨蝶呤15mg,此后每周25mg,并联合每日服用两片10mg来氟米特片或两片安慰剂片。在研究期间,患者、护士、研究人员和治疗医生均对治疗分配情况不知情。主要结局是在意向性分析人群中,联合治疗组和单药治疗组在第16周时经基线PASDAS调整后的平均PASDAS差值。本试验于2018年12月3日在荷兰试验注册中心注册(注册号NL7404)。

结果

在2019年2月19日至2021年3月11日期间,82例患者接受资格筛查。4例患者不符合入选标准,78例患者入组并随机分配至甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特组(n = 39)或甲氨蝶呤联合安慰剂组(n = 39)。78例患者中,50例(64%)为男性,28例(36%)为女性,患者的中位年龄为55.0岁(四分位间距42.0 - 64.0)。在第16周时,甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特联合治疗优于甲氨蝶呤单药治疗(PASDAS分别为3.1[标准差1.4]和3.7[标准差1.3];治疗差值为 -0.6,90%置信区间为 -1.0至 -0.1;p = 0.025)。无研究相关死亡病例。最常见的不良事件为恶心或呕吐(甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特组39例患者中有17例[44%],甲氨蝶呤联合安慰剂组39例患者中有11例[28%])、疲劳(9例[23%]对13例[33%])和丙氨酸氨基转移酶升高(12例[31%]对7例[18%])。总体而言,甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特组大多为轻度不良事件的发生率高于甲氨蝶呤联合安慰剂组。

解读

根据PASDAS,甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特联合治疗在改善银屑病关节炎患者疾病活动度方面效果更佳。然而,甲氨蝶呤联合来氟米特联合治疗的耐受性不如甲氨蝶呤单药治疗。

资助

圣马丁诊所的地区初级研究员资助。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索