Suppr超能文献

阿达木单抗引入与甲氨蝶呤剂量递增治疗中重度银屑病关节炎疗效对比研究(CONTROL):一项随机、开放标签、两部分的4期研究。

Comparison between adalimumab introduction and methotrexate dose escalation in patients with inadequately controlled psoriatic arthritis (CONTROL): a randomised, open-label, two-part, phase 4 study.

作者信息

Coates Laura C, Tillett William, D'Agostino Maria-Antonietta, Rahman Proton, Behrens Frank, McDearmon-Blondell Erin L, Bu Xianwei, Chen Liang, Kapoor Mudra, Conaghan Philip G, Mease Philip

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Rheumatol. 2022 Apr;4(4):e262-e273. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00008-X. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many patients with psoriatic arthritis do not reach minimal disease activity (MDA) on methotrexate alone. This phase 4 open-label study aimed to compare attainment of MDA following introduction of adalimumab with methotrexate escalation in patients with psoriatic arthritis who do not reach MDA after an initial methotrexate course (≤15 mg every week).

METHODS

CONTROL was a phase 4, randomised, two-part, open-label study conducted in 14 countries and 46 sites. We recruited patients with confirmed active psoriatic arthritis, naive to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, with an inadequate response to 15 mg or less of methotrexate. In part 1, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either methotrexate 15 mg (oral or subcutaneous) every week with the addition of adalimumab 40 mg (subcutaneously) every other week (adalimumab plus methotrexate group) or methotrexate (oral or subcutaneous) escalation up to 25 mg every week (escalated methotrexate group). Randomisation was done using Interactive Response Technology and stratified by the duration of methotrexate treatment (≤3 months and >3 months). In this open-label study there was no masking; participants, people giving the interventions, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were aware of group assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks. After 16 weeks (part 2), patients who reached MDA (responders) had their current therapy maintained or modified, wheras patients who did not reach MDA (non-responders) had their therapy escalated until 32 weeks. The primary endpoint in part 2 was the proportion of patients who reached MDA at 32 weeks, analysed in all patients who received one or more doses of study drug. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02814175.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 5, 2016, and March 19, 2020, 245 of 287 patients initially assessed were enrolled in the study (50% men and 50% women; 92% of patients were White). 123 patients were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus methotrexate and 122 patients to receive escalated methotrexate. All 245 patients were included in the primary analysis, and 227 completed part 1 and entered part 2. A significantly higher proportion of patients reached MDA at 16 weeks in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group (51 [41%] patients) compared with the escalated methotrexate group (16 [13%] patients; p<0·0001). Efficacy was generally maintained through 32 weeks for patients who reached MDA at 16 weeks, with 41 (80%) of 51 adalimumab responders and ten (67%) of 15 methotrexate responders maintaining MDA at 32 weeks. Of adalimumab non-responders, 17 (30%) of 57 patients reached MDA at 32 weeks after adalimumab escalation to every week dosing. Among methotrexate non-responders, 50 (55%) of 91 reached MDA after adalimumab introduction. In part 1, two patients in the adalimumab plus methotrexate group reported serious adverse events; and in part 2, one adalimumab responder, three adalimumab non-responders, and three methotrexate non-responders reported serious adverse events. No new safety signals were identified.

INTERPRETATION

Results from this novel treatment-strategy trial support the addition of adalimumab over escalating methotrexate in patients with psoriatic arthritis not reaching MDA after an initial methotrexate course. Safety results were consistent with the therapies' known safety profiles.

FUNDING

AbbVie.

摘要

背景

许多银屑病关节炎患者仅使用甲氨蝶呤无法达到最小疾病活动度(MDA)。这项4期开放标签研究旨在比较,对于在初始甲氨蝶呤疗程(每周≤15mg)后未达到MDA的银屑病关节炎患者,引入阿达木单抗与增加甲氨蝶呤剂量后达到MDA的情况。

方法

CONTROL是一项在14个国家46个地点开展的4期随机、两部分开放标签研究。我们招募确诊为活动性银屑病关节炎、未使用过生物性改善病情抗风湿药物且对15mg或更低剂量甲氨蝶呤反应不佳的患者。在第1部分,患者被随机分配(1:1)接受每周15mg甲氨蝶呤(口服或皮下注射)并每隔一周皮下注射40mg阿达木单抗(阿达木单抗加甲氨蝶呤组),或甲氨蝶呤(口服或皮下注射)剂量逐渐增加至每周25mg(甲氨蝶呤剂量增加组)。使用交互式应答技术进行随机分组,并根据甲氨蝶呤治疗时长(≤3个月和>3个月)进行分层。在这项开放标签研究中没有设盲;参与者、给予干预措施的人员、评估结果的人员以及分析数据的人员都知道分组情况。主要终点是在16周时达到MDA的患者比例。16周后(第2部分),达到MDA的患者(反应者)维持或调整其当前治疗,而未达到MDA的患者(无反应者)增加治疗剂量直至32周。第2部分的主要终点是在32周时达到MDA的患者比例,在所有接受一剂或多剂研究药物的患者中进行分析。该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT02814175。

研究结果

在2016年8月5日至2020年3月19日期间,最初评估的287例患者中有245例纳入研究(男性和女性各占50%;92%的患者为白人)。123例患者被随机分配接受阿达木单抗加甲氨蝶呤,122例患者接受增加剂量的甲氨蝶呤。所有245例患者均纳入主要分析,227例完成第1部分并进入第2部分。与甲氨蝶呤剂量增加组(16例[13%]患者)相比,阿达木单抗加甲氨蝶呤组在16周时达到MDA的患者比例显著更高(51例[41%]患者;p<0·0001)。对于在16周时达到MDA的患者,疗效一般维持到32周,51例阿达木单抗反应者中有41例(80%)、15例甲氨蝶呤反应者中有10例(67%)在32周时维持MDA。在阿达木单抗无反应者中,57例患者中有17例(30%)在阿达木单抗增加至每周给药后在32周时达到MDA。在甲氨蝶呤无反应者中,91例中有50例(55%)在引入阿达木单抗后达到MDA。在第1部分,阿达木单抗加甲氨蝶呤组有2例患者报告了严重不良事件;在第2部分,1例阿达木单抗反应者、3例阿达木单抗无反应者和3例甲氨蝶呤无反应者报告了严重不良事件。未发现新的安全信号。

解读

这项新型治疗策略试验的结果支持,对于在初始甲氨蝶呤疗程后未达到MDA的银屑病关节炎患者,添加阿达木单抗优于增加甲氨蝶呤剂量。安全性结果与这些疗法已知的安全性特征一致。

资助

艾伯维公司。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验