School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2024 Jul;44(7):1184-1198. doi: 10.1177/0271678X231220332. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
Quantitative BOLD (qBOLD) MRI allows evaluation of oxidative metabolism of the brain based purely on an endogenous contrast mechanism. The method quantifies deoxygenated blood volume (DBV) and hemoglobin oxygen saturation level of venous blood (Y), yielding oxygen extraction fraction (OEF), and along with a separate measurement of cerebral blood flow, cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO) maps. Here, we evaluated our recently reported 3D qBOLD method that rectifies a number of deficiencies in prior qBOLD approaches in terms of repeat reproducibility and sensitivity to hypercapnia on the metabolic parameters, and in comparison to dual-gas calibrated BOLD (cBOLD) MRI for determining resting-state oxygen metabolism. Results suggested no significant difference between test-retest qBOLD scans in either DBV and OEF. Exposure to hypercapnia yielded group averages of 38 and 28% for OEF and 151 and 146 µmol/min/100 g for CMRO in gray matter at baseline and hypercapnia, respectively. The decrease of OEF during hypercapnia was significant (p ≪ 0.01), whereas CMRO did not change significantly (p = 0.25). Finally, baseline OEF (37 vs. 39%) and CMRO (153 vs. 145 µmol/min/100 g) in gray matter using qBOLD and dual-gas cBOLD were found to be in good agreement with literature values, and were not significantly different from each other (p > 0.1).
定量血氧水平依赖(qBOLD)MRI 允许仅基于内源性对比机制评估大脑的氧化代谢。该方法量化了去氧血红蛋白体积(DBV)和静脉血的血红蛋白氧饱和度水平(Y),得出氧摄取分数(OEF),以及与脑血流量的单独测量一起,生成氧代谢率(CMRO)图。在这里,我们评估了我们最近报道的 3D qBOLD 方法,该方法纠正了先前 qBOLD 方法在代谢参数的可重复性和对高碳酸血症的敏感性方面的一些缺陷,并与双气体校准的血氧水平依赖(cBOLD)MRI 进行比较,以确定静息状态下的氧代谢。结果表明,在 DBV 和 OEF 方面,测试-再测试 qBOLD 扫描之间没有显著差异。高碳酸血症暴露导致灰质的 OEF 和 CMRO 的组平均值分别为 38%和 28%,基线和高碳酸血症分别为 151 和 146 µmol/min/100 g。高碳酸血症期间 OEF 的下降具有统计学意义(p<0.01),而 CMRO 没有明显变化(p=0.25)。最后,使用 qBOLD 和双气体 cBOLD 在灰质中的基线 OEF(37% vs. 39%)和 CMRO(153 vs. 145 µmol/min/100 g)与文献值非常吻合,彼此之间没有显著差异(p>0.1)。