School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau, Taipa S.A.R., People's Republic of China.
Health Psychol Rev. 2024 Sep;18(3):599-618. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2310140. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
Body dissatisfaction is a global public health concern. Self-injurious thoughts and behaviours (SITB), including suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), have been documented as potentially significant correlates of body dissatisfaction. However, prior findings regarding associations between body dissatisfaction and SITB have been somewhat inconsistent. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to determine the nature and strength of such associations in both clinical and non-clinical samples. A literature search identified 83 relevant articles and extracted 234 effect sizes. Using a three-level random-effects model, mean effect sizes ( values) for relationships between body dissatisfaction and suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, and NSSI in clinical samples were 0.29 (95% CI, 0.22-0.37), 0.16 (95% CI, 0.13-0.20) and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.19-0.34), respectively. In non-clinical samples, these values were 0.22 (95% CI, 0.16-0.28), 0.24 (95% CI, 0.17-0.30) and 0.22 (95% CI, 0.15-0.29), respectively. Several study features (e.g., participant age, geographic region and instrument validity) emerged as significant moderators. This meta-analysis provides robust support for body dissatisfaction as a significant correlate of SITB across clinical and non-clinical samples in addition to identifying study characteristics that contribute to effect size variability. Implications are discussed for SITB research, prevention and intervention.
身体不满是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。自我伤害思想和行为(SITB),包括自杀意念、自杀企图和非自杀性自我伤害(NSSI),已被记录为与身体不满的潜在重要相关因素。然而,先前关于身体不满与 SITB 之间关联的研究结果有些不一致。因此,进行了这项荟萃分析,以确定在临床和非临床样本中这些关联的性质和强度。文献检索确定了 83 篇相关文章,并提取了 234 个效应量。使用三级随机效应模型,临床样本中身体不满与自杀意念、自杀企图和 NSSI 之间关系的平均效应大小( 值)分别为 0.29(95%置信区间,0.22-0.37)、0.16(95%置信区间,0.13-0.20)和 0.26(95%置信区间,0.19-0.34)。在非临床样本中,这些值分别为 0.22(95%置信区间,0.16-0.28)、0.24(95%置信区间,0.17-0.30)和 0.22(95%置信区间,0.15-0.29)。一些研究特征(例如,参与者年龄、地理位置和仪器有效性)成为显著的调节因素。除了确定导致效应大小变化的研究特征外,这项荟萃分析为身体不满是临床和非临床样本中 SITB 的重要相关因素提供了有力支持。讨论了对 SITB 研究、预防和干预的影响。