• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助微创食管切除术——我们的首次经验。

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.

出版信息

Rozhl Chir. 2023;102(11):422-429. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429.

DOI:10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429
PMID:38290818
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with lower postoperative morbidity and better quality of life compared to open esophagectomy in patients with comparable oncological outcomes. Robotic-assisted surgery represents the next step in the development of mini- mally invasive surgery. We aim to present the results of a pilot cohort of patients undergoing robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).

METHODS

An initial cohort of patients with RAMIE was retrospectively analyzed. Operative characteristics, histopathological results, postoperative course, incidence of complications, and postoperative mortality were evaluated.

RESULTS

From 3/2022 to 6/2023, a total of 31 patients underwent RAMIE at our institution, including hybrid RAMIE (robotic abdomen, open chest) in 11 and total RAMIE in 20 patients. Most patients were male, had locally advanced tumors, predominantly adenocarcinoma and neoadjuvant treat- ment. Thirty patients had Ivor-Lewis and one patient had McKeown esophagectomy. The median total operative time was 495 minutes and median blood loss was 200 mL. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients. A median of 26 lymph nodes were removed. Postoperative Clavien-Dindo ≥3 complications occurred in 9 (29%) patients. Four (13%) patients required reoperation. Anastomotic leak was found in 5 (16%) and pneumonia in 9 (29%) patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days. One patient died in the postoperative period. Thirty-day and 90-day mortality rates were 0% and 3.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our initial experience shows that RAMIE is a safe surgical procedure and we consider its implementation at our institution to be success- ful. After overcoming the learning curve, we hope to reduce the operative time and increase the medical benefit for the patient.

摘要

介绍

与开放食管切除术相比,微创食管切除术在具有相似肿瘤学结果的患者中具有较低的术后发病率和更好的生活质量。机器人辅助手术代表了微创外科发展的下一步。我们旨在介绍接受机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)的患者的试点队列的结果。

方法

对 RAMIE 的初始患者队列进行回顾性分析。评估手术特点、组织病理学结果、术后过程、并发症发生率和术后死亡率。

结果

从 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 6 月,我院共对 31 例患者进行了 RAMIE,其中 11 例为杂交 RAMIE(机器人腹部,开胸),20 例为全 RAMIE。大多数患者为男性,患有局部晚期肿瘤,主要为腺癌和新辅助治疗。30 例患者行 Ivor-Lewis 手术,1 例患者行 McKeown 食管切除术。总手术时间中位数为 495 分钟,术中出血量中位数为 200 毫升。87%的患者达到了 R0 切除。中位数切除 26 枚淋巴结。9 例(29%)患者发生术后 Clavien-Dindo ≥3 级并发症。4 例(13%)患者需要再次手术。吻合口漏发生在 5 例(16%)患者中,肺炎发生在 9 例(29%)患者中。中位住院时间为 9 天。1 例患者术后死亡。30 天和 90 天死亡率分别为 0%和 3.2%。

结论

我们的初步经验表明,RAMIE 是一种安全的手术方法,我们认为在我们机构实施是成功的。在克服学习曲线后,我们希望减少手术时间并为患者增加医疗效益。

相似文献

1
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy - our first experience.机器人辅助微创食管切除术——我们的首次经验。
Rozhl Chir. 2023;102(11):422-429. doi: 10.33699/PIS.2023.102.11.422-429.
2
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与传统微创食管切除术(MIE)治疗食管癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doz060.
3
Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Postoperative Outcomes in a Nationwide Cohort.机器人辅助微创食管切除术:全国队列的术后结果。
J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:152-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) vs. hybrid minimally invasive esophagectomy: propensity score matched short-term outcome analysis of a European high-volume center.机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)与杂交微创食管切除术:来自欧洲大容量中心的倾向评分匹配短期结果分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Oct;36(10):7747-7755. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09254-2. Epub 2022 May 3.
5
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术:机器人辅助与腹腔镜-胸腔镜技术。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1692-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
End to side circular stapled anastomosis during robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).机器人辅助 Ivor Lewis 微创食管切除术(RAMIE)中末端到侧的圆形吻合术。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Aug 13;35(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doab088.
7
Robotic versus open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: A more accurate lymph node dissection without burdening the leak rate.机器人辅助与开放Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术:更精确的淋巴结清扫且不增加吻合口漏发生率。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jun;127(7):1109-1115. doi: 10.1002/jso.27246. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
8
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
9
Robotic Versus Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-analysis.机器人与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):39-50. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005782. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
10
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术与电视辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):270-278. doi: 10.1111/ases.12992. Epub 2021 Oct 12.