• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

兰花 Gymnadenia conopsea 的精细遗传结构与开花植物的局部密度无关。

Fine-scale genetic structure in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea is not associated with local density of flowering plants.

机构信息

Plant Ecology and Evolution, Department of Ecology and Genetics, EBC, Uppsala University, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden.

UMR 8198 -Evo-Eco-Paleo, University of Lille, Lille, France.

出版信息

Am J Bot. 2024 Feb;111(2):e16273. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16273. Epub 2024 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1002/ajb2.16273
PMID:38290971
Abstract

PREMISE

Density-dependent pollinator visitation can lead to density-dependent mating patterns and within-population genetic structure. In Gymnadenia conopsea, individuals in low-density patches receive more self pollen than individuals in high-density patches, suggesting higher relatedness at low density. Ongoing fragmentation is also expected to cause more local matings, potentially leading to biparental inbreeding depression.

METHODS

To evaluate whether relatedness decreases with local density, we analyzed 1315 SNP loci in 113 individuals within two large populations. We quantified within-population genetic structure in one of the populations, recorded potential habitat barriers, and visualized gene flow using estimated effective migration surfaces (EEMS). We further estimated the magnitude of biparental inbreeding depression that would result from matings restricted to within 5 m.

RESULTS

There was no significant relationship between local density and relatedness in any population. We detected significant fine-scale genetic structure consistent with isolation by distance, with positive kinship coefficients at distances below 10 m. Kinship coefficients were low, and predicted biparental inbreeding depression resulting from matings within the closest 5 m was a modest 1-3%. The EEMS suggested that rocks and bushes may act as barriers to gene flow within a population.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that increased self-pollen deposition in sparse patches does not necessarily cause higher selfing rates or that inbreeding depression results in low establishment success of inbred individuals. The modest relatedness suggests that biparental inbreeding depression is unlikely to be an immediate problem following fragmentation of large populations. The results further indicate that habitat structure may contribute to governing fine-scale genetic structure in G. conopsea.

摘要

前提

密度依赖型传粉者访问可以导致密度依赖型交配模式和种群内遗传结构。在 Gymnadenia conopsea 中,低密度斑块中的个体比高密度斑块中的个体接收更多的自花粉,表明低密度下的亲缘关系更高。正在进行的片段化也预计会导致更多的本地交配,可能导致双亲近亲交配的衰退。

方法

为了评估亲缘关系是否随局部密度降低,我们分析了两个大种群中 113 个个体的 1315 个 SNP 位点。我们在其中一个种群中量化了种群内遗传结构,记录了潜在的栖息地障碍,并使用估计的有效迁移面(EEMS)可视化基因流。我们进一步估计了由于限制在 5 米内的交配而导致的双亲近亲交配衰退的幅度。

结果

在任何种群中,局部密度与亲缘关系之间都没有显著的关系。我们检测到与距离隔离一致的显著细尺度遗传结构,在 10 米以下的距离上存在正亲缘系数。亲缘系数较低,预测由于在最近的 5 米内的交配而导致的双亲近亲交配衰退幅度适中为 1-3%。EEMS 表明岩石和灌木可能成为种群内基因流动的障碍。

结论

结果表明,稀疏斑块中自花粉沉积的增加不一定会导致更高的自交率或近亲交配衰退导致近交个体的建立成功率降低。适度的亲缘关系表明,在大种群分裂后,双亲近亲交配的衰退不太可能成为一个立即的问题。结果进一步表明,栖息地结构可能有助于控制 G. conopsea 的细尺度遗传结构。

相似文献

1
Fine-scale genetic structure in the orchid Gymnadenia conopsea is not associated with local density of flowering plants.兰花 Gymnadenia conopsea 的精细遗传结构与开花植物的局部密度无关。
Am J Bot. 2024 Feb;111(2):e16273. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16273. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
2
Genetic rescue by distant trees mitigates qualitative pollen limitation imposed by fine-scale spatial genetic structure.远缘树木的遗传拯救缓解了由精细空间遗传结构引起的花粉质量限制。
Mol Ecol. 2019 Oct;28(19):4363-4374. doi: 10.1111/mec.15233. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
3
Pollen limitation and reduced reproductive success are associated with local genetic effects in Prunus virginiana, a widely distributed self-incompatible shrub.花粉限制和繁殖成功率降低与弗吉尼亚李(一种广泛分布的自交不亲和灌木)的局部遗传效应有关。
Ann Bot. 2014 Mar;113(4):595-605. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct289. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
4
Limited pollen dispersal, small genetic neighborhoods, and biparental inbreeding in Vallisneria americana.美洲苦草的花粉扩散受限、遗传小居群和双亲同系交配。
Am J Bot. 2018 Feb;105(2):227-240. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1031. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
5
Gene flow and inbreeding depression inferred from fine-scale genetic structure in an endangered heterostylous perennial, Primula sieboldii.从濒危异花授粉多年生植物鄂报春的精细尺度遗传结构推断基因流动和近亲繁殖衰退
Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(4):983-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02483.x.
6
Kinship between parents reduces offspring fitness in a natural population of Rhododendron brachycarpum.父母之间的亲缘关系会降低自然种群中短柱杜鹃后代的适合度。
Ann Bot. 2010 Apr;105(4):637-46. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq018. Epub 2010 Mar 3.
7
Does long-distance pollen dispersal preclude inbreeding in tropical trees? Fragmentation genetics of Dysoxylum malabaricum in an agro-forest landscape.长距离花粉传播是否会排除热带树木的近亲交配?在一个农林景观中,对麻疯树的碎裂遗传分析。
Mol Ecol. 2012 Nov;21(22):5484-96. doi: 10.1111/mec.12054. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
8
Long-distance seed and pollen dispersal inferred from spatial genetic structure in the very low-density rainforest tree, Baillonella toxisperma Pierre, in Central Africa.从中非非常低密度雨林树种 Baillonella toxisperma Pierre 的空间遗传结构推断远距离种子和花粉传播。
Mol Ecol. 2010 Nov;19(22):4949-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04864.x. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
9
Relationships between population density, fine-scale genetic structure, mating system and pollen dispersal in a timber tree from African rainforests.非洲雨林木材树种的种群密度、精细尺度遗传结构、交配系统与花粉传播之间的关系。
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Mar;116(3):295-303. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.101. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
Reproductive success through high pollinator visitation rates despite self incompatibility in an endangered wallflower.尽管一种濒危桂竹香存在自交不亲和现象,但通过传粉者的高访花率实现了繁殖成功。
Am J Bot. 2016 Nov;103(11):1979-1989. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600193. Epub 2016 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Concordant Patterns of Population Genetic Structure in Food-Deceptive Orchids.食源性欺骗性兰花种群遗传结构的一致模式
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;16(1):67. doi: 10.3390/genes16010067.