Suppr超能文献

加拿大民众对癌症风险因素的了解程度和对癌症谣言的信任程度。

Canadians' knowledge of cancer risk factors and belief in cancer myths.

机构信息

School of Population and Public Health, CAREX Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17832-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many untrue statements about cancer prevention and risks are circulating. The objective of this study was to assess Canadians' awareness of known cancer risk factors and cancer myths (untruths or statements that are not completely true), and to explore how awareness may vary by sociodemographic and cognitive factors.

METHODS

Cancer myths were identified by conducting scans of published, grey literature, and social media. Intuitive-analytic thinking disposition scores included were actively open- and close-minded thinking, as well as preference for intuitive and effortful thinking. A survey was administered online to participants aged 18 years and older through Prolific. Results were summarized descriptively and analyzed using chi-square tests, as well as Spearman rank and Pearson correlations.

RESULTS

Responses from 734 Canadians were received. Participants were better at identifying known cancer risk factors (70% of known risks) compared to cancer myths (49%). Bivariate analyses showed differential awareness of known cancer risk factors (p < 0.05) by population density and income, cancer myths by province, and for both by ethnicity, age, and all thinking disposition scores. Active open-minded thinking and preference for effortful thinking were associated with greater discernment. Tobacco-related risk factors were well-identified (> 90% correctly identified), but recognition of other known risk factors was poor (as low as 23% for low vegetable and fruit intake). Mythical cancer risk factors with high support were consuming additives (61%), feeling stressed (52%), and consuming artificial sweeteners (49%). High uncertainty of causation was observed for glyphosate (66% neither agreed or disagreed). For factors that reduce cancer risk, reasonable awareness was observed for HPV vaccination (60%), but there was a high prevalence in cancer myths, particularly that consuming antioxidants (65%) and organic foods (45%) are protective, and some uncertainty whether drinking red wine (41%), consuming vitamins (32%), and smoking cannabis (30%) reduces cancer risk.

CONCLUSIONS

While Canadians were able to identify tobacco-related cancer risk factors, many myths were believed and numerous risk factors were not recognized. Cancer myths can be harmful in themselves and can detract the public's attention from and action on established risk factors.

摘要

背景

关于癌症预防和风险的许多不实说法正在流传。本研究的目的是评估加拿大人对已知癌症风险因素和癌症谣言(不实或不完全正确的说法)的认识,并探讨这种认识可能会如何因社会人口和认知因素而有所不同。

方法

通过对已发表文献、灰色文献和社交媒体进行扫描,确定了癌症谣言。纳入的直觉分析思维倾向得分包括积极开放和封闭思维,以及对直觉和费力思维的偏好。通过 Prolific 在线向 18 岁及以上的参与者进行调查。结果以描述性总结,并使用卡方检验、斯皮尔曼等级相关和皮尔逊相关进行分析。

结果

收到了 734 名加拿大人的回复。与癌症谣言(49%)相比,参与者更善于识别已知的癌症风险因素(70%的已知风险)。双变量分析显示,对已知癌症风险因素的认识(p<0.05)因人口密度和收入而异,对癌症谣言的认识因省份而异,而两者均因种族、年龄和所有思维倾向得分而异。积极开放的思维和费力思维的偏好与更高的辨别力相关。与烟草相关的风险因素被很好地识别(超过 90%的人正确识别),但对其他已知风险因素的认识较差(最低的只有 23%的人知道低蔬菜和水果摄入量)。被高度支持的神话般的癌症风险因素包括摄入添加剂(61%)、感到压力(52%)和摄入人工甜味剂(49%)。对草甘膦的因果关系不确定性很高(66%的人既不同意也不反对)。对于降低癌症风险的因素,人们对 HPV 疫苗接种有合理的认识(60%),但也存在许多癌症谣言,特别是认为摄入抗氧化剂(65%)和有机食品(45%)有保护作用,并且一些人不确定饮用红酒(41%)、摄入维生素(32%)和吸食大麻(30%)是否能降低癌症风险。

结论

尽管加拿大人能够识别与烟草相关的癌症风险因素,但许多谣言仍被相信,许多风险因素仍未被识别。癌症谣言本身可能有害,并可能分散公众对已确定风险因素的注意力和行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd0f/10829248/e28c2112915c/12889_2024_17832_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验