Crooks Jodie, Flemming Kate, Shulman Caroline, Casey Emma, Hudson Briony
Marie Curie, London, UK.
University of York, York, UK.
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 30;10(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00549-3.
Co-production of research aims to include people with lived experience of a phenomena throughout the research process. People experiencing homelessness often experience advance ill-health at a young age, yet access palliative care services at a disparately low rate to the level of palliative care need. The voices of people experiencing homelessness are infrequently heard throughout palliative care research, despite the complexities and intricacies of the area.
To explore the experiences of experts in the field to identify key context considerations for involving people with lived experience of homelessness in palliative and end of life care research.
Qualitative study comprising two data collection streams: interviews with professionals with experience of involving people experiencing homelessness in their work, and focus groups with people with lived experience (PWLE) of homelessness. Data were analysed using iterative, reflexive thematic analysis. Patient and Public Involvement contributors gave feedback on themes.
A total of 27 participants took part in semi-structured interviews (N = 16; professionals) or focus groups (N = 11; PWLE homelessness). Key considerations of involving people experiencing homelessness in palliative and end of life care research were developed into four key themes: complexity of lived experience of homelessness; representation of homelessness within experts by experience; professionalising lived experience; and methods for involvement.
Involvement of people with lived experience of homelessness is important in developing palliative care research. This paper begins to outline some contextual considerations for promoting involvement in a complex and intricate field of research.
研究的共同生产旨在让对某一现象有实际生活经历的人参与到整个研究过程中。无家可归者往往在年轻时就出现健康问题,但与他们对姑息治疗的需求水平相比,他们获得姑息治疗服务的比例极低。尽管该领域存在复杂性和错综复杂的情况,但在姑息治疗研究中,无家可归者的声音却很少被听到。
探讨该领域专家的经验,以确定在姑息治疗和临终关怀研究中让有无家可归实际生活经历的人参与进来的关键背景因素。
定性研究,包括两个数据收集流程:对在工作中涉及无家可归者的专业人员进行访谈,以及对有无家可归实际生活经历的人进行焦点小组讨论。使用迭代的、反思性的主题分析对数据进行分析。患者和公众参与贡献者对主题提供了反馈。
共有27名参与者参加了半结构化访谈(N = 16;专业人员)或焦点小组讨论(N = 11;有无家可归实际生活经历的人)。将在姑息治疗和临终关怀研究中让无家可归者参与进来的关键因素归纳为四个关键主题:无家可归实际生活经历的复杂性;有经验的专家对无家可归情况的呈现;将实际生活经历专业化;以及参与的方法。
有无家可归实际生活经历的人的参与对于开展姑息治疗研究很重要。本文开始概述一些在这个复杂且错综复杂的研究领域中促进参与的背景因素。