Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2024 Sep 1;43(5):474-486. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000001000. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
Immunostaining with p57KIP2 is a widely used diagnostic technique to differentiate complete hydatidiform moles (CHMs) from partial hydatidiform moles (PHM) and non-molar hydropic abortion. However, distinguishing between PHMs and non-molar hydropic abortions using histopathology alone is often challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the technical validity and additional benefits of using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in combination with p57KIP2 immunostaining to diagnose molar and non-molar conceptuses. The study involved 80 specimens, which underwent genetic diagnosis using short tandem repeat analysis, including 44 androgenetic CHMs, 20 diandric monogynic PHMs, 14 biparental non-molar hydropic abortions, 1 monoandric digynic triploid abortion, and 1 vaginal specimen of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Two pathologists independently diagnosed the cases based on morphology and p57KIP2 immunostaining while the clinical information was masked. FISH analysis was performed using 3 probes (CEP17, CEPX, and CEPY), which revealed that all androgenetic CHM and biparental diploid non-molar hydropic abortion specimens were diploid. Among the 20 diandric monogynic PHM cases examined by analyzing short tandem repeat polymorphisms, 18 were triploid, and the remaining 2 were diploid. These two specimens were possibly androgenetic/biparental mosaics based on FISH analysis, where the three-signal ratios counting 50 cells were clearly within the diploid ranges. Eight of the 20 genetic PHMs and 2 of the 14 genetically confirmed non-molar hydropic abortions that were falsely diagnosed based on morphology and immunohistochemistry by at least 1 pathologist were correctly diagnosed as PHM and non-molar hydropic abortion, respectively, by FISH analysis. However, 1 monoandric digynic villus was classified as triploid by FISH analysis, leading to a false PHM diagnosis. In conclusion, the combination of FISH analysis with p57KIP2 immunostaining helps in diagnosing molar and non-molar conceptuses in numerous cases; nevertheless, exceptional cases should be considered.
p57KIP2 免疫染色是一种广泛用于鉴别完全性葡萄胎(CHM)、部分性葡萄胎(PHM)和非葡萄胎性水样流产的诊断技术。然而,仅通过组织病理学来鉴别 PHM 和非葡萄胎性水样流产常常具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估荧光原位杂交(FISH)联合 p57KIP2 免疫染色在诊断葡萄胎和非葡萄胎胚胎中的技术有效性和额外益处。该研究涉及 80 个标本,这些标本均通过短串联重复分析进行了遗传学诊断,包括 44 例雄激素性 CHM、20 例二倍体二合子 PHM、14 例双亲性非葡萄胎性水样流产、1 例单合子二倍体三倍体流产和 1 例阴道绒毛膜瘤。两位病理学家在屏蔽临床信息的情况下,分别基于形态学和 p57KIP2 免疫染色对病例进行独立诊断。FISH 分析使用 3 个探针(CEP17、CEPX 和 CEPY)进行,结果显示所有雄激素性 CHM 和双亲性二倍体非葡萄胎性水样流产标本均为二倍体。在分析短串联重复多态性的 20 例二倍体二合子 PHM 病例中,18 例为三倍体,其余 2 例为二倍体。这两个标本可能是基于 FISH 分析的雄激素性/双亲性嵌合体,其中 50 个细胞的三信号比值明显在二倍体范围内。在至少一位病理学家基于形态学和免疫组织化学错误诊断为 PHM 和非葡萄胎性水样流产的 20 例遗传 PHM 中的 8 例和 14 例遗传确认的非葡萄胎性水样流产中,FISH 分析正确诊断为 PHM 和非葡萄胎性水样流产,分别。然而,1 例单合子二倍体绒毛被 FISH 分析归类为三倍体,导致假 PHM 诊断。总之,FISH 分析联合 p57KIP2 免疫染色有助于诊断许多病例中的葡萄胎和非葡萄胎胚胎;然而,应考虑特殊情况。