Wang Huaiyong, Liang Song, Yu Yue, Han Yun
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 16;14:1276549. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1276549. eCollection 2024.
This study evaluated the use of different neoadjuvant immunotherapy cycles and regimens for non-small cell lung cancer.
Databases were searched for articles published up until December 2023. Data on the major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, and conversion to thoracotomy were collected. A subgroup analysis was performed according to the treatment regimens and cycles. Stata/MP software was used for statistical analyses.
In total, 2430 individuals were assessed from 44 studies. Compared with those following neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.26/0.07/0.43/0.08, 95% CI: 0.18-0.34/0.04-0.10/0.28-0.58/0.04-0.14), the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs following neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy increased significantly (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.55/0.34/0.81/0.22, 95% CI: 0.48-0.63/0.28-0.41/0.69-0.90/0.13-0.33, P=0.001/0.002/0.009/0.034). No significant differences were found in the surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy. In the chemoimmunotherapy group, no statistically significant differences were found in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle, three-cycle and four-cycle groups (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.50;0.70;0.36/0.32;0.49;0.18/0.95;0.85;0.95/0.34;0.27;0.37, P=0.255/0.215/0.253/0.848). In the ICIs group, there was little change in the MPR and pCR rates, incidence of TRAEs and SAEs in the two-cycle group compared to the three-cycle group. (MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs: ES=0.28;0.20/0.06;0.08/0.45;0.35/0.10;0.02, P=0.696/0.993/0.436/0.638). The neoadjuvant treatment cycle had no significant effect on surgical resection, surgical complications, R0 resection, or conversion to thoracotomy in both regimens.
Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly increased the rate of tumor pathological remission compared to neoadjuvant immunotherapy alone but also increased the incidence of TRAEs and SAEs. The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy are found to be favorable when administered for a duration of three cycles, in comparison to both two and four cycles.
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42023407415.
本研究评估了不同新辅助免疫治疗周期和方案在非小细胞肺癌中的应用。
检索数据库中截至2023年12月发表的文章。收集主要病理缓解(MPR)、完全病理缓解(pCR)、影像学缓解、治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)、严重不良事件(SAEs)、手术切除、手术并发症、R0切除和转为开胸手术的数据。根据治疗方案和周期进行亚组分析。使用Stata/MP软件进行统计分析。
共纳入44项研究中的2430例患者。与单纯新辅助免疫治疗相比(MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs:效应量=0.26/0.07/0.43/0.08,95%置信区间:0.18 - 0.34/0.04 - 0.10/0.28 - 0.58/0.04 - 0.14),新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗后的MPR和pCR率、TRAEs和SAEs发生率显著增加(MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs:效应量=0.55/0.34/0.81/0.22,95%置信区间:0.48 - 0.63/0.28 - 0.41/0.69 - 0.90/0.13 - 0.33,P = 0.001/0.002/0.009/0.034)。在手术切除、手术并发症、R0切除或转为开胸手术方面未发现显著差异。在化疗联合免疫治疗组中,两周期、三周期和四周期组的MPR和pCR率、TRAEs和SAEs发生率无统计学显著差异(MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs:效应量=0.50;0.70;0.36/0.32;0.49;0.18/0.95;0.85;0.95/0.34;0.27;0.37,P = 0.255/0.215/0.253/0.848)。在免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)组中,两周期组与三周期组相比,MPR和pCR率、TRAEs和SAEs发生率变化不大(MPR/pCR/TRAEs/SAEs:效应量=0.28;0.20/0.06;0.08/0.45;0.35/0.10;0.02,P = 0.696/0.993/0.436/0.638)。两种方案中,新辅助治疗周期对手术切除、手术并发症、R0切除或转为开胸手术均无显著影响。
与单纯新辅助免疫治疗相比,新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗显著提高了肿瘤病理缓解率,但也增加了TRAEs和SAEs的发生率。与两周期和四周期相比,新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗进行三个周期时,疗效和安全性良好。
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails,标识符CRD42023407415。