• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PACE:PLX-PAD 治疗不适宜血运重建的严重肢体缺血患者的随机、对照、多中心、多国、III 期研究:随机临床试验。

PACE: randomized, controlled, multicentre, multinational, phase III study of PLX-PAD for critical limb ischaemia in patients unsuitable for revascularization: randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Örebro University and University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.

University Centre for Vascular Medicine and Department of Medicine-Section Angiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad437.

DOI:10.1093/bjs/znad437
PMID:38294084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10828925/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Revascularization is the primary treatment modality for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI), but is not feasible in all patients. PLX-PAD is an off-the-shelf, placental-derived, mesenchymal stromal cell-like cell therapy. This study aimed to evaluate whether PLX-PAD would increase amputation-free survival in people with CLTI who were not candidates for revascularization.

METHODS

People with CLTI and minor tissue loss (Rutherford 5) who were unsuitable for revascularization were entered into a randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, multinational, blinded, trial, in which PLX-PAD was compared with placebo (2 : 1 randomization), with 30 intramuscular injections (0.5 ml each) into the index leg on days 0 and 60. Planned follow-up was 12-36 months, and included vital status, amputations, lesion size, pain and quality-of-life assessments, haemodynamic parameters, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 213 patients enrolled, 143 were randomized to PLX-PAD and 70 to placebo. Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced. Most patients were Caucasian (96.2%), male (76.1%), and ambulatory (85.9%). Most patients (76.6%) reported at least one adverse event, which were mostly expected events in CLTI, such as skin ulcer or gangrene. The probability of major amputation or death was similar for placebo and PLX-PAD (33 and 28.6% respectively; HR 0.93, 95% c.i. 0.53 to 1.63; P = 0.788). Revascularization and complete wound healing rates were similar in the two groups. A post hoc analysis of a subpopulation of 121 patients with a baseline haemoglobin A1c level below 6.5% showed improved 12-month amputation-free survival (HR 0.46, 0.21 to 0.99; P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Although there was no evidence that PLX-PAD reduced amputation-free survival in the entire study population, benefit was observed in patients without diabetes mellitus or whose diabetes was well controlled; this requires confirmation in further studies. Trial registration: NCT03006770 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov); 2015-005532-18 (EudraCT Clinical Trials register - Search for 2015-005532-18).

摘要

背景

血运重建是治疗慢性肢体严重缺血(CLTI)的主要方法,但并非所有患者都适用。PLX-PAD 是一种现成的、胎盘来源的、间充质基质细胞样细胞疗法。本研究旨在评估 PLX-PAD 是否会增加不适合血运重建的 CLTI 患者的无截肢生存率。

方法

纳入 CLTI 伴小组织损失(Rutherford 5)且不适合血运重建的患者,进行一项随机、平行组、安慰剂对照、多国、盲法、试验,将 PLX-PAD 与安慰剂(2:1 随机化)进行比较,30 名患者在第 0 天和第 60 天接受 30 次肌肉内注射(每次 0.5ml)至索引腿。计划的随访时间为 12-36 个月,包括生命状态、截肢、病变大小、疼痛和生活质量评估、血流动力学参数和不良事件。

结果

在纳入的 213 名患者中,143 名被随机分配至 PLX-PAD 组,70 名被分配至安慰剂组。两组患者的人口统计学和基线特征均衡。大多数患者为白种人(96.2%)、男性(76.1%)和有活动能力的(85.9%)。大多数患者(76.6%)报告至少有一次不良事件,这些事件大多是 CLTI 中预期的事件,如皮肤溃疡或坏疽。安慰剂组和 PLX-PAD 组的主要截肢或死亡概率相似(分别为 33%和 28.6%;HR 0.93,95%CI 0.53 至 1.63;P = 0.788)。两组的血运重建和完全伤口愈合率相似。对基线糖化血红蛋白水平低于 6.5%的 121 名患者的亚组进行事后分析显示,12 个月无截肢生存率有所提高(HR 0.46,0.21 至 0.99;P = 0.048)。

结论

尽管没有证据表明 PLX-PAD 降低了整个研究人群的无截肢生存率,但在没有糖尿病或糖尿病控制良好的患者中观察到了益处;这需要进一步研究证实。试验注册:NCT03006770(http://www.clinicaltrials.gov);2015-005532-18(EudraCT 临床试验注册-搜索 2015-005532-18)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/2ee0607a1585/znad437f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/db7331f3dcd3/znad437f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/ca5266f07b7a/znad437f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/4b21fe5d11eb/znad437f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/2ee0607a1585/znad437f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/db7331f3dcd3/znad437f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/ca5266f07b7a/znad437f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/4b21fe5d11eb/znad437f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/785b/10828925/2ee0607a1585/znad437f4.jpg

相似文献

1
PACE: randomized, controlled, multicentre, multinational, phase III study of PLX-PAD for critical limb ischaemia in patients unsuitable for revascularization: randomized clinical trial.PACE:PLX-PAD 治疗不适宜血运重建的严重肢体缺血患者的随机、对照、多中心、多国、III 期研究:随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad437.
2
PLX-PAD Cell Treatment of Critical Limb Ischaemia: Rationale and Design of the PACE Trial.PLX-PAD 细胞治疗严重肢体缺血:PACE 试验的原理和设计。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;57(4):538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.11.008. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
3
Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Plasmid Treatment for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (STOP-PAD) Trial: Six-Month Results.基质细胞衍生因子-1质粒治疗外周动脉疾病患者(STOP-PAD)试验:六个月结果
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1526602820919951. Epub 2020 May 18.
4
Prognostic value of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification in patients with no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia.无选择慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者中血管外科学会伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分类的预后价值。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1104-1113.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.028. Epub 2018 May 22.
5
Aorto-iliac and infrainguinal artery occlusive disease: different revascularization options according to the critical limb threatening ischemia category.主髂动脉及下肢动脉阻塞性疾病:根据严重肢体缺血威胁类别选择不同的血运重建方法。
Int Angiol. 2023 Jun;42(3):209-215. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.23.04992-1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
The Society for Vascular Surgery Objective Performance Goals for Critical Limb Ischemia are attainable in select patients with ischemic wounds managed with wound care alone.血管外科学会的严重肢体缺血的客观绩效目标在单独接受伤口护理治疗的缺血性伤口的特定患者中是可实现的。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;78:28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.034. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
8
A novel therapeutic management for diabetes patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: comparison of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells versus allogenic Wharton jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells.一种治疗糖尿病合并慢性肢体缺血患者的新方法:自体骨髓单个核细胞与异体牙髓间充质干细胞的比较。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023 Aug 25;14(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03427-z.
9
Clinical outcomes of bypass-first versus endovascular-first strategy in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia due to infrageniculate arterial disease.对于因膝下动脉疾病导致慢性肢体威胁性缺血的患者,采用旁路优先与血管内优先策略的临床结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):156-163.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.244.
10
Lumbar sympathectomy versus prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia due to non-reconstructable peripheral arterial disease.腰交感神经切除术与前列腺素类药物治疗因不可重建的外周动脉疾病导致的严重肢体缺血的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 16;4(4):CD009366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009366.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of autologous cell therapy on limb salvage in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: 16-year single-center experience.自体细胞疗法对慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者保肢的疗效:16年单中心经验
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2025 Jul 15;16(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s13287-025-04493-1.
2
Long-term efficacy of autologous cell therapy, repeated PTA and conservative treatment in people with diabetes and chronic limb-threatening ischaemia.自体细胞疗法、重复经皮腔内血管成形术及保守治疗对糖尿病合并慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的长期疗效
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Sep;27(9):4729-4736. doi: 10.1111/dom.16510. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
3
Circadian Dysfunction in the Skeletal Muscle Impairs Limb Perfusion and Muscle Regeneration in Peripheral Artery Disease.

本文引用的文献

1
HIPGEN: a randomized, multicentre phase III study using intramuscular PLacenta-eXpanded stromal cells therapy for recovery following hip fracture arthroplasty : a study design.HIPGEN:一项使用肌肉注射胎盘扩增基质细胞疗法促进髋部骨折置换术后恢复的随机、多中心III期研究:研究设计
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Apr;3(4):340-347. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.34.BJO-2021-0156.R1.
2
World regional differences in outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial.全球外周动脉疾病患者结局的地域差异:EUCLID 试验的见解。
Vasc Med. 2022 Feb;27(1):21-29. doi: 10.1177/1358863X211038620. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
骨骼肌中的昼夜节律功能障碍会损害外周动脉疾病中的肢体灌注和肌肉再生。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2025 Feb;45(2):e30-e47. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.321772. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
4
The Use of Autologous Cell Therapy in Diabetic Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.自体细胞治疗在伴有慢性肢体威胁性缺血的糖尿病患者中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 23;25(18):10184. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810184.
Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Contemporary Epidemiology, Management Gaps, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.
下肢外周动脉疾病:当代流行病学、管理差距与未来方向:美国心脏协会科学声明。
Circulation. 2021 Aug 31;144(9):e171-e191. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001005. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
4
Long Term Survival and Limb Salvage in Patients With Non-Revascularisable Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia.无法血运重建的慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者的长期生存和保肢。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;62(2):225-232. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
Hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction is alleviated by thioredoxin mimetic peptides through the restoration of VEGFR-2-induced responses and improved cell survival.硫氧还蛋白模拟肽通过恢复VEGFR-2诱导的反应和改善细胞存活,减轻高血糖诱导的内皮功能障碍。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;308:73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.065. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
6
Mesenchymal Stromal Cells from Fetal and Maternal Placenta Possess Key Similarities and Differences: Potential Implications for Their Applications in Regenerative Medicine.胎儿和母体胎盘间充质基质细胞具有关键的相似性和差异性:对其在再生医学中的应用的潜在影响。
Cells. 2020 Jan 6;9(1):127. doi: 10.3390/cells9010127.
7
Impaired Regeneration Contributes to Poor Outcomes in Diabetic Peripheral Artery Disease.糖尿病外周动脉疾病再生受损导致预后不良。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2020 Jan;40(1):34-44. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312863. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
8
Angiogenic Abnormalities in Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanistic and Clinical Aspects.糖尿病中的血管生成异常:机制与临床方面。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Nov 1;104(11):5431-5444. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00980.
9
Comparison of Immediate and Long-term Outcomes in Men and Women Undergoing Revascularisation for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia in the Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL-1) Trial.在 Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg(BASIL-1)试验中,比较慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者血管重建治疗中男性和女性的即刻和长期结局。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;58(2):224-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
10
PLX-PAD Cell Treatment of Critical Limb Ischaemia: Rationale and Design of the PACE Trial.PLX-PAD 细胞治疗严重肢体缺血:PACE 试验的原理和设计。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;57(4):538-545. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.11.008. Epub 2019 Jan 25.